DY = Dividend Yield
NTA = Net Total Assets(?)

http://www.klse.com.my/website/bm/bursa_ba...cs/reading.html

Source info as far as I can think of would be their financial reports.

This post has been edited by Dias: Oct 28 2011, 08:00 AM

FSM:
OSK-UOB Cash Management Fund (just to park funds for RSP, so it's mostly empty)
AmDynamic Bond
OSK-UOB KidSave Trust
Kenanga Growth Fund
RHB - GS US Equity Fund

Since the fund is closed for distribution on 12 and 13 March, I guess that means the price has been adjusted for dividends?

This post has been edited by Dias: Mar 13 2012, 01:15 AM

For me, I use Bloomberg.

http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/AMDYMIC:MK

From here (googled Malaysian Funds Bloomberg).

http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/funds/country/malaysia/

Your number of units held would have increased threefold. Hence the NAV would go down by 2/3 (66.66...%).

100 units gets additional 200 units to arrive at 300 units total. Total value remains the same, no?

I'd expect the adjustment to take awhile if I were to use the one week gap between the NAV adjustment and the units reflected for AmDynamic Bond as an example.

With the increase in units from distribution, wouldn't the quantum of increase in value per NAV be much greater? It's less about the dividends but more about the impact of holding more units with each RM0.0001 increase in NAV, right?

i.e. An increase of RM0.0001 in NAV will equate to RM0.15 increase in value (holding 1500 units) compared to RM0.10 for those holding only 1000 units?

I'm not a chatty person, in real life and online. I had read Pink's example earlier around 2pm, understood that it is from a top-down approach (I was looking from a bottom-up perspective on an NAV movement per unit impact earlier) and accepted it. I don't see any need to say any more unnecessary stuff.

I had asked a question with the intention to clarify if my assumptions were right or wrong. Nowhere did I made a statement.

Now, to bring in the saying that it is kindergarten logic is just pure looking down on other peoples unintentional misinterpretation of UT calculation, mind you. Sometimes things were overlooked.

This post has been edited by Dias: Jun 29 2012, 04:01 PM

Don't know if it's the same but in Excel 2010, the version can be access via FILE > HELP

PS: Going from Excel 2003 to 2007/2010 is a big shock since the layout is totally different. My recommendation is to google for where the buttons are located. It saved me a lot of time in the early stages until I got familiar with the layout.

This post has been edited by Dias: Aug 23 2012, 10:15 PM