May 6 2008, 09:21 PM
QUOTE(RoxyGal @ May 6 2008, 08:36 PM)
as i know,it's easy to fake a bump using the method mentioned by me at the above.
But, i suggest that a trade enforcer is on a volunteer basis and not selling any stuff in lyn. This will make trade enforcer clean and fair.
Any nominee?
But, i suggest that a trade enforcer is on a volunteer basis and not selling any stuff in lyn. This will make trade enforcer clean and fair.
Any nominee?
QUOTE(RoxyGal @ May 6 2008, 08:03 PM)
what if the seller ask someone to keep bumping the thread ? with different ip?
guilty?
We have our own way to investigate on indirect bump via dup or 3rd party. guilty?
Added on May 6, 2008, 9:49 pm
QUOTE(hongjj)
ok, so it's clear now. whenever someone asks "can you send me PM/ details", the seller is not allowed to reply any of them like "tq, PM sent". if 20 ppl do the same in that thread, the seller is still not allowed to. with this rule in force, i feel it's just better to lock up the thread after each sales post by the seller since seller has no power to stop buyers from posting the above questions. after all, all sales can be done thru PM later. and it definitely looks better in the forum instead of having threads that have 20 posts from buyers but no acknowledgement from seller.
Alternatively, the seller could just update the first post in the thread saying that all PMs are replied e.g. ALL PM on May 6 Replied. There's no need to post a new post to tell them UGPM.
QUOTE
if buyers are interested, they WILL post in the thread anyway. if no one is interested, so be it and the thread be left at page 10. the seller can still use the bump function per day. only sore losers that see some other sellers that are doing better and their threads more active will go complain.
The reason for us to implement this is to eliminate this unfair situation to happen. We want this place to be fair for all. Like what you said, if the thread is popular, it'll get bumped more whenever people posts in that thread, thus there's no reason for the TS to reply UGPM to earn another bump again. It's just redundant
Added on May 6, 2008, 9:51 pm
QUOTE(N's @ May 6 2008, 05:19 PM)
I got 1 question need to ask.
Why must 1 post PM sent, who he want to inform?
The receiver should know what???? Cant he see the red bar ontop?
Not everyone can understand simple things like that. Some need to be slapped a few times before they can finally understand about indirect bump.Why must 1 post PM sent, who he want to inform?
The receiver should know what???? Cant he see the red bar ontop?
This post has been edited by vikingw2k: May 6 2008, 09:57 PM
Quote
0.0154sec
0.35
6 queries
GZIP Disabled