Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Movies The IRON MAN Movies Thread, CONFIRMED: IRON MAN III - May 3, 2013.
|
fujkenasai
|
Apr 26 2013, 01:32 AM
|
|
QUOTE(BelowAverage @ Apr 26 2013, 01:30 AM) yea, in the 3D version. After your youtube scene, it says ironman will be back, and then goes to the avenger 2 scene. Since 3D release today so the video nt yet leak ahh damn have to wait
|
|
|
|
|
|
hybr1d3d
|
Apr 26 2013, 01:39 AM
|
Getting Started

|
I have to say, Shane black fooled me well
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human Nature
|
Apr 26 2013, 01:41 AM
|
|
ole ole ole
|
|
|
|
|
|
arecheese
|
Apr 26 2013, 01:43 AM
|
|
dammit, i knew i should have stayed back! can someone post the avengers 2 part when it goes up on utube or somewhere? and btw, the movie was just awesome! makes me want to buy those hot toys iron man figures lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMike3300
|
Apr 26 2013, 01:52 AM
|
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I'm confused.
Why does he remove the shrapnel in surgery at the very last minute of his glorious day?
Will he no longer needs to wear the miniaturized arc reactor and just combat using drones from home? This post has been edited by Mike3300: Apr 26 2013, 01:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
BelowAverage
|
Apr 26 2013, 01:54 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Mike3300 @ Apr 26 2013, 01:52 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I have a few questions? Why does he remove the shrapnel in surgery at the very last minute of his glorious day? Will he no longer needs to wear the miniaturized arc reactor and just combat using drones from home? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i also wonder that, they didnt explain why he blow up his ironman suit, or that surgery scene. I was hoping his eye turn orange at the end showing he took the extremis procedure like the comics
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMike3300
|
Apr 26 2013, 02:00 AM
|
|
QUOTE(BelowAverage @ Apr 26 2013, 01:54 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i also wonder that, they didnt explain why he blow up his ironman suit, or that surgery scene. I was hoping his eye turn orange at the end showing he took the extremis procedure like the comics » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I guess that blowing up the drones is his way of saying, "let's get my life back and lead a normal life, maybe just build a suit or two.". They doesn't explain how Pepper cured from the product eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
whoba
|
Apr 26 2013, 03:37 AM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(BelowAverage @ Apr 26 2013, 12:42 AM) Anyway, if you stay after the credits, there is an avenger 2 trailer, which shows new member which are » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « spiderman and fantastic 4 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « What? are you joking? Just saw it, and it was just a scene talking with Bruce Banner (Hulk).
|
|
|
|
|
|
jubz
|
Apr 26 2013, 08:08 AM
|
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « - pace was OK - armors eyecandy *___* - what a Mandarin twist ... - personal preference: (3=1) > 2 - oh and the after credits ... potong stim only. This post has been edited by jubz: Apr 26 2013, 08:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Human Nature
|
Apr 26 2013, 09:56 AM
|
|
QUOTE(BelowAverage @ Apr 26 2013, 01:54 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i also wonder that, they didnt explain why he blow up his ironman suit, or that surgery scene. I was hoping his eye turn orange at the end showing he took the extremis procedure like the comics » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I think he did, because during the surgery scene, he mentioned something like why stop there
|
|
|
|
|
|
BeastX
|
Apr 26 2013, 10:35 AM
|
|
Iron Man 3 review from a scientific perspective: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Overall of the science or pseudo science of the movie: The science of IM3 is disjointed, while IM1, IM2 and Avengers touch one particular notion of science (mainly physics and mechanics) and expand on it, IM3's sciences tries to connect all these branches of science namely genetics (plant and human), nanotech (not specific), neurology (related to genetics, but in this case: brain structure), physics (energy/heat) without any logical linkage.
While you may use the Extremist (take the essence) story-line, you can ground it with logical (current) science. If large liberties are taken with the Mandarin, why not "ground" the Science as well.
Biology 1. Lost limbs are healed quickly, fine (as ridiculous as a nameless mutant on X-Men3 or Amazing Spiderman's cicak), why does scarring on the face of Brandt still remains. 2. Changing of DNA, that enables A) Regeneration of body parts. B) Produce heat and C) Survice the heat generated beyond any living lifeforms. Whatever protective protein that an organism can generate is still based on organic compounds that are not able to withstand heat able to melt metal. Too many functions of convenience. Extremis comics I believe did not go to such "extreme", human bomb and heat. 3. While vetebrates have a neurosystem, plants do not, lets just say the relation in which both are essentially bombs are due to DNA. Which bring to a point: slot's in the brain does not keep the blue-print, but your Genomic DNA does. Why the brain relation (apart from the excuse of hologram for Killian and Potts). Black and Pierce essentially took what's wrong with Extremis virus notion, throw out what's logical and incorporated new stuff that's illogical. 4. Healing of bullet holes on the extremis soldier, sure the flesh heals but the fabric don't.
My Nic-picks, less on science, more on story 1. While Mk. 1-6 are powered by the ArcReactor, Mk. 7 of Avengers might be. All other Mark's appears to have self-container power sources. Mk.42 however appears to run on rechargeble batteries. As genius as Tony is why does he not have to foresight to utilise the power on his chest, and rely on what appears to be charged by power-mains from the garage or boat. Fine, it's a prototype excuse. 2. IM3 is almost all on the Man, little to no emphasis on the armors except for just a little on Mk.42. No cools hologram on design of armors. 3. Other than Mk. 42, I believe Tony put on maybe only 3 or 4 other armors. There rest are mostly just eye candy and fireworks. 4. IM, IM2, Avengers all kept the legacy of previous armors, shows a continuity. Starting all from a clean slate after IM3 kind of reduce the significants of all previous movies. Why thrown the triangle reactor, it's his, his father and Vanko's legacy, big plot points of IM2 and Avengers.
What's good Action sequences showing Tony's "kung-fu" with the armor and partial armor.
This post has been edited by BeastX: Apr 26 2013, 11:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
DWExia
|
Apr 26 2013, 11:06 AM
|
Getting Started

|
What? There's a scene leading to spiderman and fantastic 4 wtf?
I watched IMAX 3D ytday fiirst screening.
No such thing. Only the normal post credit scene.
Btw they didn't say RDJ or Iron Man will return. Only Tony Stark. Don't keep your hopes up
|
|
|
|
|
|
ur4m3shi
|
Apr 26 2013, 11:18 AM
|
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « yeah ... was hoping to see mark 42 kick arse but turns out it is an unfinished prototype ... sigh ... the rest of the suits also doesnt really show their capabilities/special features except maybe for "igor" ....  ... not liking the villains also ... put all that aside .. end of the day still enjoy the movie & gonna buy the bluray later when its out
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omega Z
|
Apr 26 2013, 11:24 AM
|
Getting Started

|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(DWExia @ Apr 26 2013, 11:06 AM) What? There's a scene leading to spiderman and fantastic 4 wtf? I watched IMAX 3D ytday fiirst screening. No such thing. Only the normal post credit scene. Btw they didn't say RDJ or Iron Man will return. Only Tony Stark. Don't keep your hopes up » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « spiderman and F4?
I thought Marvel sold off their rights? Dont think they got it anytime soon, as Spidey 2 is on the way. This post has been edited by Omega Z: Apr 26 2013, 11:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
DWExia
|
Apr 26 2013, 11:25 AM
|
Getting Started

|
someone in the previous page mention
|
|
|
|
|
|
koolspyda
|
Apr 26 2013, 02:28 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Mike3300 @ Apr 26 2013, 03:00 AM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I guess that blowing up the drones is his way of saying, "let's get my life back and lead a normal life, maybe just build a suit or two.". They doesn't explain how Pepper cured from the product eh? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « He's a mechanic, he fix things. he said that to pepper potts towards the end. He is suppose to fix things, that what he is good at.
Also the equation he (tonY Stark) gave to his one night stand Botanist girl (Maya Hansen) in switzerland, who has been finding it hard to stabilise the Extremis nano technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
koolspyda
|
Apr 26 2013, 02:30 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(BeastX @ Apr 26 2013, 11:35 AM) Iron Man 3 review from a scientific perspective: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Overall of the science or pseudo science of the movie: The science of IM3 is disjointed, while IM1, IM2 and Avengers touch one particular notion of science (mainly physics and mechanics) and expand on it, IM3's sciences tries to connect all these branches of science namely genetics (plant and human), nanotech (not specific), neurology (related to genetics, but in this case: brain structure), physics (energy/heat) without any logical linkage.
While you may use the Extremist (take the essence) story-line, you can ground it with logical (current) science. If large liberties are taken with the Mandarin, why not "ground" the Science as well.
Biology 1. Lost limbs are healed quickly, fine (as ridiculous as a nameless mutant on X-Men3 or Amazing Spiderman's cicak), why does scarring on the face of Brandt still remains. 2. Changing of DNA, that enables A) Regeneration of body parts. B) Produce heat and C) Survice the heat generated beyond any living lifeforms. Whatever protective protein that an organism can generate is still based on organic compounds that are not able to withstand heat able to melt metal. Too many functions of convenience. Extremis comics I believe did not go to such "extreme", human bomb and heat. 3. While vetebrates have a neurosystem, plants do not, lets just say the relation in which both are essentially bombs are due to DNA. Which bring to a point: slot's in the brain does not keep the blue-print, but your Genomic DNA does. Why the brain relation (apart from the excuse of hologram for Killian and Potts). Black and Pierce essentially took what's wrong with Extremis virus notion, throw out what's logical and incorporated new stuff that's illogical. 4. Healing of bullet holes on the extremis soldier, sure the flesh heals but the fabric don't.
My Nic-picks, less on science, more on story 1. While Mk. 1-6 are powered by the ArcReactor, Mk. 7 of Avengers might be. All other Mark's appears to have self-container power sources. Mk.42 however appears to run on rechargeble batteries. As genius as Tony is why does he not have to foresight to utilise the power on his chest, and rely on what appears to be charged by power-mains from the garage or boat. Fine, it's a prototype excuse. 2. IM3 is almost all on the Man, little to no emphasis on the armors except for just a little on Mk.42. No cools hologram on design of armors. 3. Other than Mk. 42, I believe Tony put on maybe only 3 or 4 other armors. There rest are mostly just eye candy and fireworks. 4. IM, IM2, Avengers all kept the legacy of previous armors, shows a continuity. Starting all from a clean slate after IM3 kind of reduce the significants of all previous movies. Why thrown the triangle reactor, it's his, his father and Vanko's legacy, big plot points of IM2 and Avengers.
What's good Action sequences showing Tony's "kung-fu" with the armor and partial armor.
 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « thank you for the cold shower
|
|
|
|
|
|
lopo90
|
Apr 26 2013, 03:36 PM
|
|
So nostalgic when they played eiffel65 Blue at the beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
tonYe
|
Apr 26 2013, 04:23 PM
|
|
After the slightly disappointing Iron Man 2 (2010) and the awesome The Avengers (2012), one may question how the sequels of these individual titles are going to succeed. Surprisingly, Iron Man 3 turned out to be quite a smart continuation, focusing on Tony Stark's (Robert Downey Jr.) coping with his post-Avengers struggles and self-reassurance of his superhero capabilities as a natural human being, without ditching its cool factor and comical humour. The level of entertainment makes the movie's obvious flaws and plot holes (see spoiler section on my blog) very forgivable for me. The fans of the original comics may feel disappointed with the villain Mandarin (Ben Kingsley), but I thought the unfaithfulness works this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JonSpark
|
Apr 26 2013, 04:24 PM
|
|
QUOTE(lopo90 @ Apr 26 2013, 03:36 PM) So nostalgic when they played eiffel65 Blue at the beginning  and so out of place yet nostalgic
|
|
|
|
|