Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
4-2-1 vs 4-1 header for Iswara 1.3
|
TStineagle
|
Apr 21 2008, 09:49 PM, updated 18y ago
|
|
I am thinking of changing the entire exhaust system on my 1.3 Iswara. But now... i'm facing a dilema.
Should i change the stock to larger 4-2-1 header or 4-1 header?
Anyone got comments on which is better for the iswara 1.3 engine?
My car modding adviser tells me to change the default stock 4-2-1 to a larger piped 4-1 header; and that it would add more pickup.
What do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
lawl
|
Apr 21 2008, 10:00 PM
|
|
ur car is auto or manual? ppl said auto go for 4-2-1, manual 4-1.. hope dis helps..
|
|
|
|
|
|
the_catacombs
|
Apr 21 2008, 11:32 PM
|
|
get 4-2-1 extractor....
|
|
|
|
|
|
TStineagle
|
Apr 22 2008, 07:14 AM
|
|
its a manual...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oly
|
Apr 22 2008, 07:41 AM
|
|
4-2-1...engine stock?..piping stock?..
|
|
|
|
|
|
xtorm
|
Apr 22 2008, 09:29 AM
|
|
i use 4-1 then change to 4-2-1. if u wan torque then better use 4-2-1, but reving 4-1 better, very easy rev, rev till 8k also shiok  i was using the old iswara, best bang for bucks is sanding the carburator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kevinlim001
|
Apr 22 2008, 10:00 AM
|
|
if u wan pick up at low rpm i think 4-2-1 is more suitable if 4-1 is more to high rev.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GoldenHawk
|
Apr 22 2008, 12:01 PM
|
|
Go for the 4-2-1. Not many people can get the hang of the 4-1 setup. You changing your muffler as well?
|
|
|
|
|
|
the_catacombs
|
Apr 22 2008, 12:27 PM
|
|
QUOTE(xtorm @ Apr 22 2008, 09:29 AM) i use 4-1 then change to 4-2-1. if u wan torque then better use 4-2-1, but reving 4-1 better, very easy rev, rev till 8k also shiok  i was using the old iswara, best bang for bucks is sanding the carburator. what u mean by sanding the carburetor??..
|
|
|
|
|
|
GoldenHawk
|
Apr 22 2008, 12:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(the_catacombs @ Apr 22 2008, 12:27 PM) what u mean by sanding the carburetor??..  I think he means porting/polishing the carb
|
|
|
|
|
|
the_catacombs
|
Apr 22 2008, 12:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(GoldenHawk @ Apr 22 2008, 12:31 PM) I think he means porting/polishing the carb  icic...  i jz woke up... blur abit...
|
|
|
|
|
|
alamdamai1
|
Apr 22 2008, 01:49 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(xtorm @ Apr 22 2008, 09:29 AM) i use 4-1 then change to 4-2-1. if u wan torque then better use 4-2-1, but reving 4-1 better, very easy rev, rev till 8k also shiok  i was using the old iswara, best bang for bucks is sanding the carburator. Bro xtorm, do you know of any w'shop in Klang Valley that can do a good job in porting the carb and usually how much does it cost usually?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TStineagle
|
Apr 22 2008, 05:43 PM
|
|
currently i am using stock 4-2-1. exhaust piping changed from the midbox onwards. changed to larger piping and muffler s-flow marco muffler.
so 4-2-1 for midrange rev power while 4-1 is for high rev power? i guess 4-2-1 will save alot of fuel since the engine doesn't need to be revved high to achieve tourque. but issit true that 4-1 set up will deliver a better pick up overall?
rev till 8krpm burn alot of fuel kao kao ar? xD
This post has been edited by tineagle: Apr 22 2008, 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
the_catacombs
|
Apr 22 2008, 07:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(tineagle @ Apr 22 2008, 05:43 PM) but issit true that 4-1 set up will deliver a better pick up overall? rev till 8krpm burn alot of fuel kao kao ar? xD yes if u rev till high high... at high rpm, ur revs is vr smooth... no restriction at the exhaust... but low rpm pickup will suffer if u use 4-1 extractor... rev till 8k burn alot of fuel only... wont burn kao kao one...
|
|
|
|
|
|
xtorm
|
Apr 22 2008, 09:58 PM
|
|
sand as in using sand paper and sand the inlet parts, or should i say mouth?
DIY...hahahaha, damn i miss the sound and pull of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TStineagle
|
Apr 23 2008, 10:18 AM
|
|
1 more question. does a bullet provide better airflow than a midbox? whats the diff between the two?
|
|
|
|
|
|
the_catacombs
|
Apr 23 2008, 11:09 AM
|
|
QUOTE(tineagle @ Apr 23 2008, 10:18 AM) 1 more question. does a bullet provide better airflow than a midbox? whats the diff between the two? midbox is more restrictive compare to a bullet....
|
|
|
|
|
|
ryan_hustler
|
Apr 24 2008, 11:11 AM
|
|
QUOTE(the_catacombs @ Apr 23 2008, 11:09 AM) midbox is more restrictive compare to a bullet.... midbox is just an empty metal tabung,since it has a higher volume,the exhaust gas gets slowed down..the best setup will be to keep the velocity of the exhaust gas high so it can exit the engine without restrictions and the fastest possible way..i dont understand why people say backpressure is necessary..i think the best setup will be a straight pipe from the extractor till the end but this is bloody hell loud hence the need for muffler and bullets.. This post has been edited by ryan_hustler: Apr 24 2008, 11:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
GoldenHawk
|
Apr 24 2008, 12:28 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ryan_hustler @ Apr 24 2008, 11:11 AM) midbox is just an empty metal tabung,since it has a higher volume,the exhaust gas gets slowed down..the best setup will be to keep the velocity of the exhaust gas high so it can exit the engine without restrictions and the fastest possible way..i dont understand why people say backpressure is necessary..i think the best setup will be a straight pipe from the extractor till the end but this is bloody hell loud hence the need for muffler and bullets.. Google up "exhaust scavenging"...
|
|
|
|
|
|
the_catacombs
|
Apr 24 2008, 01:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ryan_hustler @ Apr 24 2008, 11:11 AM) midbox is just an empty metal tabung,since it has a higher volume,the exhaust gas gets slowed down..the best setup will be to keep the velocity of the exhaust gas high so it can exit the engine without restrictions and the fastest possible way..i dont understand why people say backpressure is necessary..i think the best setup will be a straight pipe from the extractor till the end but this is bloody hell loud hence the need for muffler and bullets.. go exhaust shop and try it out urself.... den u'll understand what we meant...
|
|
|
|
|