Some Maybank news.
Maybank Paying Too Much?
Stock Market V11, Stock Market talk
Stock Market V11, Stock Market talk
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 09:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 27 2008, 10:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2008, 02:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(kinwawa @ Mar 28 2008, 02:47 PM) wah....usually u r very patient one wor Cherroy tai kor...how come today u still buy although price is not dipping??? got any news or......get ur Bonus or xtra money liao? hehehehe...... Haha I had the same thought, when cheeroy buys something surely shoot up one. haha |
|
|
Mar 28 2008, 03:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
|
|
|
Mar 28 2008, 04:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(aretla @ Mar 28 2008, 04:47 PM) hahaha...my style is different with u.. Same with me, if I want to buy something after evaluating it, I won't bother queue for it. I just call my broker, tell her to buy it 'NOW!' then wait for the confirmation. when i decided to buy.. i will juz queue at the last done price.. i wont queue at lower price juz to earn tat few cents difference... mayb tats y i also hardly can earn a lot lo If it's something I wish to buy but too expensive I just ask the broker to tell me when it reaches my target price. Haha already so many times they call me whenever Maybulk reaches below RM4, but I still never buy. |
|
|
Mar 29 2008, 04:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(dsugums @ Mar 29 2008, 03:59 PM) Anyone can explain what does "CUP" or "DUP" means whenever I want to purchase shares (in Maybank online)? wah you just main tembak only. From the FAQ it states that;I just tembak select CUP for now Thanks in advance "Committed Uncleared Purchase or CUP Where there is cash or available margin in the account at the time of placing the purchase order, the said order can be tagged as 'CUP' trade. This cash or margin amount will be locked for this 'CUP' trade for settlement." "Direct Uncleared Purchase or DUP When the said funds are available at the time of placing the purchase order, the order will be classified as a 'DUP' trade. " Not really sure but I can guess maybe if you have margin, it will deduct the margin when you make a CUP trade. Where as in DUP, it will deduct the cash available from your account. In other words, you can't make purchases beyond your margin of trading. Best if you ask them directly to be honest. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 06:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(aretla @ Mar 30 2008, 03:01 PM) hey guys... im looking for online material or ebook which have a good description on wat share prices and volume are all about.. Try this link in our link thread. A lot of useful articles and guides. any recommend? 10s.... http://www.investopedia.com/university/buildingblocks.asp And for others looking for materials to read, try the link thread in this forum, there a lot of links there and would help a lot if many have links to contribute. |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 08:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(keith_hjinhoh @ Mar 30 2008, 07:02 PM) I've a question regarding the Bursa System. As far as I know, the system will always buy at lowest and sell at highest.Say if we order a buy at 3.10, however, there's a seller sells at 3.06. Will Bursa System match it for us? Say if we order a sell at 3.10, however, there's a buyer buys at 3.16. Will Bursa System match it for us? |
|
|
Mar 30 2008, 11:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
My statement still stands. System will always buy at lowest and sell at highest.
If there is a queue to BUY at RM1.00 and you try to SELL at RM0.80, it will be sold at RM1.00. If there is a queue to SELL at RM1.00 and you try to BUY at RM1.10, it will buy at RM1.00. If there is a queue to SELL at RM1.00 and a queue to BUY at RM0.95, and you go and key in a BUY for RM1.10, you will BUY at RM1.00. If there is a queue to SELL at RM1.00 and a queue to BUY at RM0.95, and you go and key in a BUY for RM0.85, you go into a RM0.85 queue. |
|
|
Mar 31 2008, 09:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
|
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 01:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
For the financial year ended Jan 31 (FY08), Hap Seng saw its net profit balloon by 602% to RM846.9mil and revenue expand 515% to RM2.24bil compared with FY07.
The company said the results included a gain of RM601.6mil resulting from the listing of its plantation business, Hap Seng Plantations Holdings Bhd last November. Huh?? How can proceeds from the listing of a unit or subsidiary considered revenue? |
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 02:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(verbatim @ Apr 1 2008, 01:48 PM) heh definitely misleading for The Star business to report net profits 'ballooned' and giving big numbers like '515%' and '602%'. When the money isn't really money coming from business but more of a equity cash raising event. Reading the news event is as though the company actually paid TheStar to make them look good. And about the dividend. Please re-read the quarterly report for those of you who are thinking of chasing the share for dividend, the only dividend you'll be getting in the near future is RM0.07 per share and NOT RM0.56 per share. The rest has already been paid. No one is going to raise cash via equity to pay out dividends. And the dividends paid were to reward shareholders who voted to allow them to sell off their plantation shares to the public for additional capital. This post has been edited by skiddtrader: Apr 1 2008, 02:04 PM |
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 02:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(jasontoh @ Apr 1 2008, 02:03 PM) U sure? I got from their financial report is proposed div per share (sen) for the current quarter is 53 "14. [b]Dividends(a) Dividend paid for year ended 31 January 2008 (i) an interim dividend of 3.5 sen (2007: 3.5 sen) per ordinary share less income tax at 26% (2007: 27%) which was approved by the Board of Directors on 27 September 2007 had been paid on 26 October 2007; (ii) a special interim dividend of 41.0 sen per ordinary share less income tax at 26% and a special interim tax exempt dividend of 5.0 sen per ordinary share which were approved by the Board of Directors on 20 November 2007 had been paid on 14 December 2007. (b) The Board of Directors have on even date proposed a final dividend for year ended 31 January 2008 which is subject to the approval of shareholders at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting of the Company as follows: (i) Amount per ordinary share of RM1.00 each - Final Dividend 7.0 sen less income tax at 25% (ii) Previous year corresponding period: Amount per ordinary share of RM1.00 each - Final Dividend 3.5 sen less income tax at 26% (iii) Total dividend for the current financial year: 56.5 sen (2007: 7.0 sen comprising an interim dividend of 3.5 sen per ordinary share less income tax at 27% and final dividend of 3.5 sen per ordinary share less income tax at 26%) (b) The entitlement and payment date will be determined at a later date." Read that statement again please and do the calculations. Only the 7 sen dividend is not paid yet, the rest is paid already. Confusing isn't it? Hmmm I wonder why they make it confusing. This post has been edited by skiddtrader: Apr 1 2008, 02:10 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 02:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(kinwawa @ Apr 1 2008, 02:26 PM) if 2008 they can give another 30-50 cent dividen...then tat's really a lot already lor! patient patient...they r heading into the right direction....dun worry can keep for long term.... I highly doubt so. For one, the 56.5 cent dividend is including the 41 cents dividend paid last year after the proposal for separating Plantations out was approved by the shareholders. Maybe they promised the dividends to appeased the shareholders, in my opinion. Same like when Multipurpose bought Magnum stakes and then distributed Magnums cash as special dividend of 80 cents. The majority sharehold which was Multipurpose itself was the main winner there. Now that Hap Seng Plantations itself has it's own shareholders, meaning the EPS will be affected right? More people, less pie remember. They get in return more capital for expansion or debt financing, at the expense of sharing the profits for more people. Now with CPO prices stabilizing and maybe dropping, future seemed bleaker to be honest. Again this is all my opinion, not a recommendation to buy or sell. |
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 02:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(jasontoh @ Apr 1 2008, 02:48 PM) I find that your analysis quite some time. But I think plantation stocks quite stable. Look at IOICorp, Bstead. I've sold Bstead at RM5 and wanted to get it back when it reach RM2, but sadly, the day never come. (till today) To be honest, I haven't done much research on plantations at all. Just my current bearish outlook of the market generally. |
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 04:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
|
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 04:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
For the ones still unsure if Hap Seng is giving 56.5 cents or not. Here is an excerpt from the edge, which I find has the most accurate article regarding Hap Seng's recent announcements.
"It proposed a final dividend of seven sen per share less tax. This, in addition to the interim dividend of 3.5 sen per share less tax paid on Oct 26, 2007, a special interim dividend of 41 sen per share less tax and a tax exempt dividend of five sen paid on Dec 14, 2007, will bring the total dividend for the year to 56.5 sen per share. " Business Times and The Star business news is misleading. This post has been edited by skiddtrader: Apr 1 2008, 05:05 PM |
|
|
Apr 1 2008, 06:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Apr 1 2008, 05:41 PM) Want to bet? No offence taken. I do agree that the news is "technically" correct but it's "ethically" wrong, therefore I feel it is misleading to a reader. I bet Rm1 (anyone Added on April 1, 2008, 5:48 pm The news article perfectly correct, just 'kei poh kau choi' (Hokkien) Sometimes reading financial atricle, need to scrutinise every word carefully, not take for granted. Any misleading or misunderstanding can lead to $$$ losses, so becareful. Cheers. Kind of like telling your children there are gonna get as much as 1000 bucks as allowances in December making them happy, but actually not mentioning it takes into account the 950 bucks already given since January. So the December allowance is only 50 bucks. That was how Business Times was telling it. It's true, that a trained eye can read between the lines and ignore all the fanfare for the cold facts, but most people will get distracted with the big numbers like "602% increase in NET profits" or "Net profit balloons" or "EPS increase by 500%". I've learned to treat company announcements with greater skepticism and cynicism to really question their motives behind their announcements and also their agenda. As a small fry in a world of sharks, best is to keep checking your food is not bait rather then eating up every worm in the ocean. |
|
|
Apr 2 2008, 02:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(naz_b_85 @ Apr 2 2008, 01:40 PM) Pana, Naz, both type of warrants can have conversion. Only difference is CA warrants cannot be exchanged for mother share, but the cash equivalent of it. As far as I know all these type of 3rd party issued warrants are cash settled. That's what I thought too, warrants with Csometing are third party issues correct? while warrants with Wsomething is issued by the company itself yes? But i checked it here http://www.klse.com.my/website/bm/market_i...ll_warrants.pdf and there was a conversion ratio for sime-cb? How? For the case of conversion ratio. A higher conversion ratio means the gearing is higher. So for even a small amount of increase on the mother share, because of the higher gearing, the warrants will have a larger movement. That's why warrants are so attractive because of the gearing or subsequent leverage they can be used for higher gains compared to the mother share. The reason why the numbers seems a bit high is because ht ewarrant is out of money or has no value. But since the warrants only expire in July, people are betting on it hence the slight premium on the warrant. The other SIME-CF has even a higher premium if you add up the numbers due to it's longer expiry. |
|
|
Apr 2 2008, 02:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
QUOTE(naz_b_85 @ Apr 2 2008, 02:00 PM) I gathered from some reading that the exercise is subjected to this conversion ratio correct? It's not actually a conversion ratio to the mother share but a conversion ration to be used in my exercise of the warrant in the formula as this: To know if the warrant is worth exercising.Profit/loss = Number of warrants x (closing price - exercise price) X conversion ratio (in this case 0.1) Plus after that you need to factor in the warrant price (premium price) and exercise expenses? Is this all correct? Anyone? Meaning if Sime closed at 12.10 at 16/7/2008 and the sime-cb exercise price is 12.00, based on the contract, the calculation is like this: ((if i bought 10000 shares or 100 lots) Profit/loss = 10000 x (12.10 - 12.00) x 0.1 = RM 100 So, if my cost for the 10000 sime-cb share was 0.01 x 10000 = RM 100 I would have made nothing and still had to fork out abit for the expense cost??? Warrant price x conversion ratio + exercise price < Current mother share price. If it is more, then don't bother converting since you will lose anyway but converting you will lose more. thus the warrants are toilet paper. But if the mothershare price is above the exercise price. You stand to gain from the difference. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0188sec
0.56
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 08:07 AM |