Intel C2D E8400 VS Intel Xeon 3110, What is the differences?
|
|
 Mar 18 2008, 11:51 PM
|
 
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007  
|
QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Mar 18 2008, 11:46 PM) I will checkout which have a good FPO.Hope can get Q746A/Q743A on Xeon but hwbot point not much when compare to insane E8400 lol wats that? haha dont mind to explain abit more in layman's term? hehe.....  |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2008, 09:02 AM
|
Senior Member
734 posts Joined: Aug 2005
|
QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Mar 18 2008, 11:46 PM) I will checkout which have a good FPO.Hope can get Q746A/Q743A on Xeon but hwbot point not much when compare to insane E8400 DUH???quite hard to understand " ur statement"  . from what i understand...it suppose to be the same processor, with the same built, requirement is the same, but then again try it for your self to be sure..... |
|
|
Mar 20 2008, 12:08 AM
|
 
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule
|
QUOTE(forger @ Mar 19 2008, 09:02 AM) DUH??? FPO=batch and manufacturing batchquite hard to understand " ur statement" . from what i understand...it suppose to be the same processor, with the same built, requirement is the same, but then again try it for your self to be sure..... hwbot=oc database E8400 even don't go into top 100 oc also have 4points while E3110 not even 10 entries and the point is not much with 9.5's SPI,like that,2points to 4points This post has been edited by OC4/3: Mar 21 2008, 11:35 AM |
|
|
Mar 20 2008, 12:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007
|
QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Mar 20 2008, 12:08 AM) FPO=batch and manufacturing batch somehow i dont really understand what are u trying to explain... >_<" maybe my interpretation is soo bad... hwbot=oc database E8400 even no 100 also have 4points while E3110 not even 100 entries and the point is not much with 9.5's like that,2points to 4points  |
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 02:09 PM
|
|
Senior Member
734 posts Joined: Aug 2005
|
u not really explaining things to a fellow oc'er bro, surely we the "normal" person can't understand exactly want you wanted to say....
|
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 05:55 PM
|
Senior Member
1,404 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: KL
|
I think they are almost the same just with different branding...
The lower end Xeons are also running on the Core 2 architecture Only the higher ends one use diff sockets and have diff features(Correct me if I am wrong) Basically C2Ds are meant to be sold to desktop users and Xeons in servers, something like that |
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 07:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,507 posts Joined: May 2007
|
QUOTE(raptor_cZn @ Mar 22 2008, 05:55 PM) I think they are almost the same just with different branding... if u say they are same.... why thier voltage range is diff.... and alot ppl saying they have diff advantages such as xeon have better file management and Core architechture is better in multimedia....The lower end Xeons are also running on the Core 2 architecture Only the higher ends one use diff sockets and have diff features(Correct me if I am wrong) Basically C2Ds are meant to be sold to desktop users and Xeons in servers, something like that and also mention the microcode is diff.... confuse.... currently too many seller offering xeon to replace C2D E8400 demand.... |
|
|
Mar 22 2008, 07:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,404 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: KL
|
the voltage is set to be different..I'm not saying that its exactly the same
I dont think that xeons have advantages over file managment QUOTE The Xeon brand refers to many families of Intel's x86 multiprocessing CPUs - for dual-processor (DP) and multi-processor (MP) configuration on a single motherboard targeted at non-consumer markets of server and workstation computers, and also at blade servers and embedded systems. The Xeon brand has been maintained over several generations of x86 and x86-64 processors. Older models added the Xeon moniker to the end of the name of their corresponding desktop processor, but more recent models used the name Xeon on its own. The Xeon CPUs generally have more cache than their desktop counterparts in addition to multiprocessing capabilities. Intel's (non-x86) IA-64 processors are called Itanium, not Xeon. From Wikipedia Another Quote QUOTE 3000-series "Conroe" The 3000 series, codenamed Conroe (product code 80557) dual-core Xeon (branded) CPU,[4] released at the end of September 2006, was just rebranded version of the Intel's mainstream Conroe otherwise branded as Core 2 Duo (for consumer desktops). Unlike most Xeon processors, they only support single-CPU operation. They use Socket T (LGA775), operate on a 1066 MHz front-side bus, and do not support Hyper-Threading. Processors with a number ending in "5" have a 1333 MT/s FSB.[5] |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0185sec
 0.30
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 07:39 PM |
Quote