QUOTE(CityLife @ Mar 24 2008, 10:38 PM)
Good Bolehland Spirit.
In theory, everything is possible.
In relation to the local cybergames scenario, however, this would also depend on the particular organizer.
Just compare last year's WCG:Msia and WCG:SG which is organized by In2 and RaptureGaming. We can see how come after so many years ICM still give SG to be the organizer for WCG:Asian.
Hmm...while WCG.my is more traditional compared to the grand looking WCG.sg, it's all come down to this lah - do you prefer all winners get to go to World Final or only selected winners? In theory, everything is possible.
In relation to the local cybergames scenario, however, this would also depend on the particular organizer.
Just compare last year's WCG:Msia and WCG:SG which is organized by In2 and RaptureGaming. We can see how come after so many years ICM still give SG to be the organizer for WCG:Asian.
Personally, I don't see the meaning of our WCG if got all official games but not even half of the winner get the free trip to Cologne because you blew it all on the event grandness. Also, WCG.sg was held together with Asian WCG and GXL. That's like three tournament in one single weekend. If WCG.sg stand on its own, I personally don't think it would be that grand. Also, try to take out DoTA from their event. I believe that could spell a backlash, w00t.
Compare to last year's WCG.my, there's still significant number of participants even without DoTA around. That basically showed that WCG.my can stand on its own and plus, all winners get to go for free (IF there was no visa problem). I guess it's just our gaming culture is still different from SG.
Truth to be told, Malaysia supposed to host this year's WCG Asian. Don't know what happen, but ICM passed it back to SG. Having an international gaming event ain't easy and cheap...might as well get the resources first and make it great rather than cut corner here and there, then the event suck. Maybe next year, who knows?
Mar 24 2008, 11:04 PM
Quote
0.0117sec
1.27
6 queries
GZIP Disabled