yeah he has got a cf ... now must be very happy to get good 3dmark scores. keep it up bro

---

Added on March 28, 2008, 9:18 pmthe processor doink... what else.. the processor cant be oc-ed to high fsbs.. so that bottlenecks the score by plenty.

This post has been edited by a1098113: Mar 28 2008, 09:18 PM

the master is back... mr bryan.. sorry fellas, but officially retired.. so will get back to you guys one day.. have fun OCing

oh by the way, bryan how do you get that ratio of the NB internal clock. And why is it multiplied by the fsb clock? I dont understand.

You dont need that much Vcore for your speed. You can in fact play on stock Vcore. I believe. Your load temp is very high and uncharacteristic of 3.0Ghz.

heng,


read this

you can just msn me anytime bro. i am always there for u guys.

try doing it again.. the same test again. Not that i dont believe you, but i believe the SP32M for v1.5 is a bit buggy, coz i got 17m once on just 3.0Ghz as well. And i did again, it was 18m. So try again and confirm. Thanks.

A food for thought from a world class ocer i know. Everyone here who has a E2 series proc, please run a SP32M and see who has the best times. And i know, that SP32M can be buggy, so please do 2 runs at least and get the most consistent result of all. And post it up at the designated thread. This would be good to classify who is the best tweaker of their procs and ram

@all
lets make this SP32M work... and to KMarc, welcome to the E2 world. We have a class ocer here. Better than me Let keep on movin No OCing from me, but ill still help you boys. for E2140 users, try to beat my mark in SP32M

if you look back, check on bryans post on NB dividers.. so u might have to give some Vmch pump and a higher Vcore.
ur default Mult - 9
now if you wanna pump at 6* then u would have to consider 9/6 = 1.5 and multiply this to your FSB, 400*1.5 = 600Mhz, this explains why if u put 400*6 manually, u cant, coz u will need Vcore sufficient to pump for 600Mhz, which is impossible.
For 8* multiplier, the ratio would be 9/8 = 1.125, so if u want to run 400*8 on your proc (e2160 with 9*) u would need Vcore that can run 400*1.125 = 450Mhz.. which probably needs about 1.5V and a Vmch of 1.33V

Try 1.5V on Vcore and 1.33V on NB for 400*8

---

Added on March 31, 2008, 1:31 amoh yeah since ur on GGbyte, put your NB as default What i said is just a theoretical idea i gathered from what Bryan said.

This post has been edited by a1098113: Mar 31 2008, 01:31 AM

my team value rams can hit 1080Mhz.. i think thats speaks lots...

e6300 is outdated and most used for OC. Boring ler.

i disagree. Its not bios 14 thats the best, i believe its bios 10 or 11. Bios 12 onwards dont really help a single bit.

hmm but seriously, from my own experience bro clawy, i would rather not use bios 14,bios 15.... coz though it helps with the double posting issue, it significantly reduces potential for OC as well as boot up time is rather slow... i also found another issue with both 14 and 15, the fsb clock resets to the default speed of the proc... which sux..

But i believe most of them use bios 14 coz of the so called fixed code for the e2160.. but hmm, besides that.. the auto Vdimm they give overvolts the ram..

---

Added on April 1, 2008, 6:26 pmyes i have.. coz cant focus on too many things bro.. i am easily reachable in MSN like some of them do.. There are few here who can help. with the IP35-E,

This post has been edited by a1098113: Apr 1 2008, 06:26 PM

so fast u have rmaed your board... why? u have the foxconn mars rite> what went wrong>?

why you never tell me that you sold your foxconn. ??? anyways u missed out on a great board.

85 on TJunction

well for my e2140 with the abit ip35-e, i can do 3.1Ghz with 1.325V but yes again, mine is a gem

Is mars a 6-phase setup or a 4-phase setup like the BI and IP35-E?

flattie:
youre explanation is just about right.

Kmarc:
boss, u surely can OC better lor..

@kmarc


BIOS set.

@flattie
i said your explanation is just about right because of this particular statement you made, otherwise it would have been wrong like Bryan pointed.



@silver
Bryan has given a good explanation on 6-phase, he hasnt misunderstood, he is not old yet By the way, hows your proc doing?