why do you need youtube embeds on signature?
Feedback Youtube Embedding in Signature, Possibility?
Feedback Youtube Embedding in Signature, Possibility?
|
|
Feb 16 2008, 07:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
why do you need youtube embeds on signature?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 16 2008, 08:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(firedauz @ Feb 16 2008, 07:06 PM) Simple as an answer - to make the signature looks much better @ awesome/fantastic/woooah/cool/etc. thought so. QUOTE(firedauz @ Feb 16 2008, 07:06 PM) On another note, I might later expect a post saying 'it would lag the site' or 'there are no codes existing for IPB'. actually youtube embeds don't lag the server. simply because the LYN server only serves you the code. your browser reads the code and calls whatever else from youtube without going through LYN server. But yeah, I assume there are no problem with those; simple reason again - we have been having alot of YouTube videos on LYN, and its been tested over more than a year. So a resize smaller in a sig, with almost just the same code would just be a quick editing (of course, with testing). No biggie, just a suggestion my concern (as the person who's it's harder to monitor signatures too, just in case they contain unsuitable material. so it's like one has to load the vids just to check out what's on the signature. put it this way la, even the SERIOUS TALK tag is not treated seriously. that also among 1 of the many R&Rs that are frequently broken. what more a youtube on signature? anyway, let's see what the admins have to say. I'm not a decision maker but I'm just expressing my thoughts. it's an interesting idea but to me i wouldn't dream of implementing it on LYN. abuse is common here. Added on February 16, 2008, 8:07 pm QUOTE(firedauz @ Feb 16 2008, 07:51 PM) My current sig is at the most limit of allowed size. This youtube examples are quite smaller than the limit, so a line or two text is still possible below the videos (just to write something). dimensions are not an issue. This post has been edited by goldfries: Feb 16 2008, 08:07 PM |
|
|
Feb 16 2008, 08:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
if you set post count as requirement, it may trigger a spam festival.
while waiting for admin feedback, no harm having more ideas on how to implement. to have it individually enabled would be a great feature but i'm not sure about the amount of work involved. don't worry about discrimination. when we choose, we're already practising discrimination. |
|
|
Feb 19 2008, 06:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(wKkaY @ Feb 19 2008, 05:06 PM) ....I don't think abuse is a strong reason to reject this proposal... guys, i'd like to point out that though it's not a STRONG reason - it could still be a valid reason. btw have any of you embed link a video that requires AGE CONFIRMATION before? what will happen? i think some stuff might be offensive in Malaysian culture but not something that's against YouTube's policies. that one we'll just have to rely on forummers with lotsa free time to report la. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0136sec
0.21
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 08:22 PM |