QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 27 2008, 06:20 PM)
well, for one thing, IPTAs dont often take fresh graduates to become part of the teaching staff unless they have some serious achievements under their belt. when i graduated in 2001, there wasnt any permanent vacancies, so the faculty had to apply to the administration for more fundings. so i had to wait for the opening, which apparently took 10months. so i became a part time lecturer rather than just wait and do nothing.
only if there were an opening readily available, and a 3.50++ with a bunch of dean's list and other awards, could one be taken directly into the teaching staff. even so, the faculty will have to screen them through interviews. great at learning doesnt mean u'll be good at lecturing. in my case, i had a 1 year long interview (via part time teaching), so the real interview was pretty much nothing.
no. at the moment interior design does not have an accreditation system, but they do have a society for it. check out
MSID.
whoahh,, a 1 year long interview? wow, i didn't know it's
that hard to be a lecturer.
btw, the streamlining result has been announced yesterday. and guess what? i'm accepted in the Applied Arts & Design program!! that means, I'll be able to take ID in the 2nd year!!! wohooo!!!~~~ i'm so so so so happy!
oh, thanx, i'll check out the MSID website after this.
a lot of people (esp my mom) keep telling me that i shouldn't have applied for ID in the 1st place and that i should've applied for architecture instead. they say that being an ID in malaysia doesn't promise me (or anyone taking ID) a bright future, and that it may be hard for me to get a job and survive in this field, and so on. is it true? is this really what's happening out there?
don't get me wrong, i'm totally not against the fact that studying in architecture is a much better option than studying in ID, because after graduating in architecture, you're able to do ID, landscape, and so on. but then, i didn't put architecture as my 1st choice as i'm afraid that i won't be able to handle the pressure of studying architecture. and i kind of think that i love ID more than architecture. am i making a right decision by choosing/studying ID?
and what should i do to 'shine' in the ID field when i'm working someday?
This post has been edited by myesarah: May 2 2008, 01:09 AM