Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel Penryn Overclocking Thread, Toasting next gen 45nm babes ~

views
     
phunkydude
post May 12 2008, 10:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



QUOTE(OC4/3 @ May 12 2008, 08:23 PM)
Same thing.Xeon=C2D with Xeon Identification String
*
talking on performance, yes it's same.

wat i notice is.. the vid is diff. ,
while as mentioned by silverfire, the e3110 is running hotter... (from the e3110 oc thread)
requires lower voltage on oc? .. tat 1 i not sure.

from wat i heard is, it's from different fab.? while the binning process is diff. too
higher bin is wat i heard.

but heck, regarding performance... both same jer~
phunkydude
post May 13 2008, 08:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



mobo bios... on vcore menu,
either using vid+ ['X' mv] , or shows the exact vcore to choose/select.

for other mobo like gheygabyte, can select vcore to as low as, eg. 0.5v
so u got option to undervolt it till the lowest stable point to achieve lowest temp. on stock speed.
or u can also oc but still undervolt a bit (means running lower than vid.)
of course, need to stress test it to find the sweet point of undervolt+oc.
phunkydude
post May 13 2008, 08:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



he ask u to be braver, add more to clock more tongue.gif
phunkydude
post Aug 16 2008, 10:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



wooot~ kmarc got new toy again' drool.gif
upgraditis nii~ laugh.gif

vcore damn kao low... so sweettt
mine pucking high doh.gif


___

toughnut , don't get wrong cpu oh tongue.gif
kmarc's is x3320

x3220 is 2.4ghz kentsfield 65nm
while mine x3210 , 2.13ghz laugh.gif damn low for a stock quadz'

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0297sec    0.44    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 01:51 PM