ahuh

so far both of my cats are doing nice
this is one of many faulty things with older hng long tanks

do ask them to upgrade to rx18 if possible

As stated by Archer13

RX18 is the default ones for HL tanks as of now, less faulty

No idea LOL since mine is a-okay til now

it is by Heng Long, comes with non-metal gear, good enough for normal play, should cost around rm300++
you ought to PM machvelle for this, if he has any
photo review

LOL the bolded part is highly subjective
I personally have both, and from my POV, VSTank is very detailed and nicely proportional. Size aside (and if price is of no concern, but since it's you, I don't think it's a major thing ), VSTank is a nice tank for you to have. Do note that they don't have smoke, and unlike Heng Long, there isn't any sound when the tank is idle.

IR is using IR Battle System, as for BB/airsoft, it's merely just for pestering/annoying people/pets/test your aiming skills

an unfair comparison of 1/24 VSTank Tiger I and 1/16 Heng Long Tiger II


box size comparison for the two of them

Ah yes another fact that you need to consider
VSTank is running on AA batts, lotsa em. 16 to be exact

Price wise, Heng Long isnt a bad choice, really. Just have to know which one is good, and which one is meh

awesome haul

the latest ones are better, so yeah, u've a great deal with ztz

i can PM you some seller later on in here. price are of 300+ for Heng Long 1/16 rc, and 399+ for VSTanks
For actual shops, one of it is:
RC Dreamz

Heng Long do have KV-1 while VSTank have both KV-1 and KV-2
take your pick

Now i am considering the ztz

among all, i would advise not to go for tiger i

the earlier tiger i by heng long uses the old rx-13 board, which is problematic
the newer ones does fix the problem with the use of rx-18 along with other improvements, namely:
a. the mantlet is now in correct position
b. the gun is now in correct length

but some is still need of improvement, like:
a. the symmetrical turret shape is still there. the left side should be tad narrower
b. the stowage bin andle should be 90 degrees towards the turret
c. the suspension should be inversed for the left side (both side of suspension arms are swinging towards the back)
d. the commander's cupola end should aim towards the far end front of loader's hatch, which brings the next one
e. the vision slit is somewhat wrong

but all these are some that i can identified. the cover for engine grill is also not historically correct if i do remember well.
get the tiger ii instead

or from the list, any. i don't really check for other tank's accuracy comparison

Accuracy aside, another thing is that Tiger I do enjoy getting tracked since it is using pin. Unlike Tiger II, Tiger I track is narrower, hence the tendency of it being tracked is higher.

don't get me wrong, the new heng long tiger (with rx-18 board) is a great tank. i am just being nitpicky with the accuracy comparative with the real steel. likewise, that is why i didn't get myself heng long jagdpanther and panther g since the lower glacis plate is a bit wrong. that's just me though i like my tank to be as it is without plenty of mod to get it just right, hehe

i would suggest you to get what you want. that way, you will get the maximum satisfaction with every penny spend for such a beauty

panzer iv is also tad bit inaccurate as well
http://www.rctankregiment.com/rctankforum/....php?f=40&t=833

i do have found the link last time, but that one is stored in my pc
as of now i am replying using hp, so i can't recall the address
but it does involved loosening up plenty of screws, and playing around with the suspension

how mini is mini
is it a scale ver or a cutey tank

lol tank kontot
cute

nazrul90
macam lipas kudung

that kinda sucks man
hopefully your sherman is good oob