Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Canon EOS 450D - New Launch Jan-24, 2008, Wow...live view, new processor........

views
     
peacezxp
post May 25 2008, 02:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: KL


QUOTE(-|JuStIn|- @ May 25 2008, 02:07 AM)
WHOA! u wanna know the difference?
about 1-2k. thats the difference. hahah
THe 17-40 is an L lens. meaning its of higher quality in terms of built and IQ.
The 17-55 IS is an overpriced lens which i dont recommend u getting unless ur some rich-ass kid with nuthin better to blow ur cash on, and dont want to donate to our LYN grass eating club.
The 17-50mm is slightly noisy and has a slightly less focal range than the 17-55 is. but the performance is there. stunning IQ. plus. its way cheaper than either of the other 2 lenses.  nod.gif
*
U sure that the 17-55 IS is overpriced? Tested the the 17-55 IS owned by vikingw2k and his previous 17-40 L side by side and I certainly envy the 17-55 IS sharpness.
peacezxp
post May 25 2008, 02:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: KL


QUOTE(genkis3 @ May 25 2008, 02:12 AM)
issit that bad? actually im considering to get it...
never try myself, but read review said it have L lens IQ with IS, just the built quality is poor.
pls enlighten me....
*
For me I would certainly go for 17-55 IS. any owner of the lens want to trade wif my 17-40 L? sweat.gif
peacezxp
post May 25 2008, 02:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: KL


QUOTE(-|JuStIn|- @ May 25 2008, 02:16 AM)
if 3.5k is cheap then go ahead. its not even an L lens man...
PRICE
Maybe ur confused. the question was the Canon 17-55mm f2.8 IS lens, not the 17-55mm kitty lens la...
*
The kitty lens is 18-55 and not 17-55 rite?

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0248sec    0.65    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 10:36 PM