Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography Canon EOS 300D/350D/400D/450D, Go Rebellionz - V2!, DigitalRebel XT/XTi/XSi/KISS Territory!
|
derek87
|
 Mar 26 2008, 10:37 AM
|
|
QUOTE(DjKenji @ Mar 26 2008, 04:42 AM) ok survey jor so headache now!!!! here my list and price see whether to get two differ rm500 + only..which should I invest!!! first choice 17-40L, BG-E3, Backpack total = rm3270second choice Tammy17-50, BG-E3, Backpack, 580EXII total = rm3790No need to think... second choice.. go for it. You will love the performance of the tammy + 580EXII. |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 11:04 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(R a D ! c 4 L @ Mar 26 2008, 11:02 AM) 2nd that. the 1st choice has its advantage over moist and dust(L lens ma). If i were u i'd hit the 1st choice if i wanna invest in a good lens for the future. Lol... you've got a point there. L lens future investment for FF sensors. He's gonna go crazy again. |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 11:13 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Mar 26 2008, 11:10 AM) I will prefer the build of L lenses... Call me sick. The only 2 lenses that I am kind of avoiding to use among my collection are 50 f1.4 and 17-55 simply because they are not L and do not have the Lansi looks.... Most likely I will sell both lenses sometime next year. I dun like them not because of optical performance. Thier performance are great... But the looks....  Eric, your L disease is getting stronger. You'll need to visit doctor nonac soon. Or else your disease will grow even stronger.  This post has been edited by derek87: Mar 26 2008, 11:13 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 11:34 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Mar 26 2008, 11:20 AM) I have a feeling telling me I am not alone.... Some friend told me they do not like thier 100 macro because it is the only non- L lense.... Well... I guess it is exclussive sickness among Canon group....  Just to share with you... The major reason why I do not like D40 and 5D because they lack of 1D looks department... You guys are working mah... got income each month.... "We" those who are still studying cant really afford L lense, that is why we try to get lenses which has the closest performance to those L lenses.. haha... |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 12:07 PM
|
|
|
Hey.. i just noticed there's a movie called L change the world. Was it you Voip who directed the movie? This post has been edited by derek87: Mar 26 2008, 12:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 02:26 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(zzloo @ Mar 26 2008, 02:16 PM) i oso same same ald la.. thats y now dun hv enough $$ oso dun wan buy tammy 17-50 2.8.. not even looks at it.. L the best  bro Voip.. i got some crazy thing in my mind.. mayb should just share between us tru pm zzloo, some personal questions for you... why would you want to use two systems? nikon d80 and canon 350d? |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 02:30 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(R a D ! c 4 L @ Mar 26 2008, 02:28 PM) er... im having the thought of investing in some SB800 in the future eh?? you changing to nikon meh? how to use SB800 with canon together? manual flash? |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 02:48 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Mar 26 2008, 02:47 PM) LOL.... Actually I myself know very well that should not judge based on the lenses looks too much... Nothing wrong with 50 f1.4 and 17-55... In fact, they are great performancer..... It is just that... I cann't help it... felt strange when i read this " perfor"mancer"... no offence... i tot it's called performer? : D |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 03:01 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(myjunk @ Mar 26 2008, 02:55 PM) 16mm what? 16mm - 35mm L? or ? btw.. he has great pictures.. |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 03:17 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(TheVoIP @ Mar 26 2008, 03:03 PM) Look at the domain name, five prime i see... five different prime 16mms... poison wei.... |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 26 2008, 05:45 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(sherren @ Mar 26 2008, 04:34 PM) wow ur Dad and you share the same Hobby  Very Cool , unlike my Dad buys a Powershot G9 he hardly even use  In the end im the one who used it the most Then sell your dad's G9 and get NEW GEARS!!! LOL.... |
|
|
|
|
|
derek87
|
Mar 27 2008, 02:05 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(sherren @ Mar 26 2008, 09:16 PM)  to the people who use 350D do you notice the parameter 1[ what is this neutral or for ?] when stock already + contrast and saturation and sharpness, where else Parameter 2[ this should be standard ] is all 0 which mean like standard is it right? and a few sets we can set to our liking , anyone here got tips to tweak the Color tone, saturation, sharpness , Contrast for Potrait, Neutral, Standard, Landscape . I know the EOS 400D and the newer model has its own presets already. If you shoot RAW, you dun have to care about those.. coz everything turn to 0 when you process them. If you shoot jpeg, then maybe you can try this. I use this. Contrast +2, Sharpness +2, Saturation +1, color tone 0. Im used to this already. but i usually shoot in RAW. |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0363sec
0.32
7 queries
GZIP Disabled