I'd go for that over the tammy and its the same zoom range as the 18-50mm, except for the extra 1mm on the wider end the tammy haveWhy choose Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8?, and not Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5?
|
|
 Jan 22 2008, 03:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Elite
4,744 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur  
|
sigma also have a f2.8 constant aperture lens
I'd go for that over the tammy and its the same zoom range as the 18-50mm, except for the extra 1mm on the wider end the tammy have |
Quote|
|
Jan 22 2008, 03:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
4,744 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
^17-40L? 16-35 f2.8 II L?
 |
|
|
Nov 24 2008, 10:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
4,744 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
there's the sigma 18-50 f2.8 what.
|
| Change to: |  0.0450sec
 0.65
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 07:45 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.