Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Undervalued Equities in Malaysia

views
     
cherroy
post Jan 4 2008, 10:23 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(jcvstlys @ Jan 4 2008, 09:42 PM)
Actually, low P/E is good or high P/E? some books say high, some book say low. =.=' confused.
*
PE is simplify term is how many year the company profit can recoup back your initial capital, so lower better or higher better? tongue.gif smile.gif

Typical undervalued equities would be:

1. Low PE (this can be complicated as PE generally is a past record, one or market always concern about the future/prospect), so in actual term should be low future PE. Looking past PE can be misleading sometimes, becareful about it.

2. Market price < NTA (Doesn't 100% correct especially when company making losses time, it can wipe out the NTA)

3. Market price < the real worth of the company.

For 2&3, NTA doesn't mean is a final truth value of the company, it is just a book value. If company didn't revalue its assets, NTA won't increase either. FYI, NTA increases in two way, either through profit or asset appreciation revaluation.

For Finance stock, market generally uses Price to Book ratio (P/BV) to determine its fair value.

This post has been edited by cherroy: Jan 4 2008, 10:54 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0141sec    0.37    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 01:07 AM