Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 On Air,QX9650, GA-X38-DS5,8800GT & Team DDR2-1200

views
     
kmarc
post Dec 8 2007, 11:47 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(Lodewijk @ Dec 8 2007, 11:37 PM)
it's not really 1.72 volt needed for 4.4 Ghz.

Here's the situation :

- X38-DS5 vcore option above 1.6 volt increment from 0.0025 change to 0.05v (1.65, 1.7, 1.75, 1.8 etc)
- Vdroop on this mobo around 0.03, and real vcore detected by CPU-Z/Everest difference with BIOS setting around 0.03 too. Example : you set 1.65 volt in BIOS, the real vcore you get is : 1.65 - (0.03 + 0.03) = 1.59v
- When i need 1.68 volt for CPU, i can't set the vcore 1.7, because the real vcore applied will be 1.64. So i must go 1,75 volt on BIOS, get real vcore 1.72 and vdroop up to 1.68 - 1.69. This is the real vcore for the CPU.

About idle temp around 31 - 35 degree and full load reach 47 - 50 degree
*
Hmmm.... but still high vcore wor...... what's the default vcore?

I wonder whether these new 45nm proc can stand high vcore or not.... you know, narrower space, increase risk of electromigration, etc.... hmm.gif

BTW, the temperature is cool!!!
kmarc
post Dec 8 2007, 11:56 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



I see. Could you give some OC capabilities of this proc on each vcore setting? E.g. Stable OC at 1.3v, 1.35v, 1.4v, 1.5v, or something like that...... wanna know how they OC on lower vcore.... smile.gif

Edit : Oh ya, what's your vdimm setting?

This post has been edited by kmarc: Dec 8 2007, 11:57 PM
kmarc
post Dec 9 2007, 07:22 AM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



Yeah, my next target is the Q9450... wub.gif

Best bang for buck.... drool.gif
kmarc
post Dec 9 2007, 01:46 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(irenic @ Dec 9 2007, 07:24 AM)
nice clock benny~! btw while the penryn seems to be a very2 good ocing chip, i wonder why it seems like  clock per clock it has same performance as the current quad core..

maybe the extra l2 cache is too overkill .. currently...

if so, people who is not intends to oc extremely, might not have benefits migrating from kentsfield to penryn.. sad.gif

btw i hope the retail one also can hit as high as the ES.. or perhaps better than that!! biggrin.gif
*
A few reviews showed that the wolfdale is, on average, faster than conroe by about 5-10%. Can't remember about kentsfield vs yorkfield though.... IIRC, the most benefit would be those apps that take advantage of SSE4, especially video apps....

QUOTE(Lodewijk @ Dec 9 2007, 08:03 AM)
yap Q9450 best bang for buck... but there's a problem if you want to OC it...the multi is too low.. you will need very very good MB to reach higher clock with it.
Oh ya, forgot about the CPU multipler. Hmmmm.... actually not a problem for me as I'm not an extreme overclocker. Currently using the E6750 with 8x multiplier too.... smile.gif
kmarc
post Dec 11 2007, 07:39 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



Current Intel CPUs can't throttle each core separately. That means that all the 4 cores are running at that speed.

The Q9450 has a 8x multiplier, just like the E6750.....

SuperPi doesn't test for CPU stability like what orthos does..... smile.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0175sec    0.31    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 02:20 AM