Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 On Air,QX9650, GA-X38-DS5,8800GT & Team DDR2-1200

views
     
Quazacolt
post Dec 9 2007, 07:29 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(Lodewijk @ Dec 8 2007, 11:37 PM)
it's not really 1.72 volt needed for 4.4 Ghz.

Here's the situation :

- X38-DS5 vcore option above 1.6 volt increment from 0.0025 change to 0.05v (1.65, 1.7, 1.75, 1.8 etc)
- Vdroop on this mobo around 0.03, and real vcore detected by CPU-Z/Everest difference with BIOS setting around 0.03 too. Example : you set 1.65 volt in BIOS, the real vcore you get is : 1.65 - (0.03 + 0.03) = 1.59v
- When i need 1.68 volt for CPU, i can't set the vcore 1.7, because the real vcore applied will be 1.64. So i must go 1,75 volt on BIOS, get real vcore 1.72 and vdroop up to 1.68 - 1.69. This is the real vcore for the CPU.

About idle temp around 31 - 35 degree and full load reach 47 - 50 degree
*
1.7 vcore and that kinda temp? jesus imma throw my kentsfield now lol
Quazacolt
post Dec 10 2007, 03:34 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(irenic @ Dec 9 2007, 04:44 PM)
yeah the difference is very big when comparing kentsfield's b3 vs yorkfield.. biggrin.gif
wow so low vcore  .. i guess next year 4ghz gonna be a 24/7 standard for all ..  thumbup.gif
yup the SSE4! forgot bout it.. nice feature and surely benefits those who works with video editting ,,  thumbup.gif
*
4ghz on ~1.3 vcore seems too fake to believe with the current mainstream hardware.

and imo the Q9450 shouldnt be a problem to most so long they arent extreme overclockers, im using 355x9 and the default multiplier is 10 and the core extreme mainly unlocks those higher up multipliers that arent used by most doh.gif

eitherway the oc results are just too impressive be it achievable clock speeds, voltage requirement, and most importantly temperatures.

with all the current clock speed advancements on intel's core chips, one would think that they are returning back to their old P4 clockspeed race? cuz the main thing thats really advancing since dual/quad cores are clock speed. wonder if they could come up with some kinda tech to ultilize the multi core procs even if the application doesnt ultilize it. eg:
program only uses 2 core, the processor's 10 cores would then divide up the load between all 10 cores, without assistance needed from applications/OS.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0156sec    0.66    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 10:58 AM