how can this NADIA speak so unprofessionally n use so many "beautiful" words!!!! somemore stress tat she is from big 4. its really embarrassing tat u r ACCA student n from big 4.

just to clarify ACCA student and big 4 staff is not like tat! cos im ACCA affiliate and working in big 4 oso!

speak good english doesn't mean tat high executive will look "HIGH" for u. though its one of the important factor. even u can speak very beautiful english but have such a "BEAUTIFUL" attitude and EQ, do u think ppl will appreciate u and promote u? no! don forget when u move to more senior level, ppl will under u n work for u. if u have such a low EQ n attitude, ppl will complain n leave. no one wish to serve u. just like my last leader. we all boycott her!!! n she left the company!!!

i think she really has narrow minded n think tat speak a good english will adore by high executie. there r so many others factors on it. wonder how she pass her ACCA exam.....

This post has been edited by Bank: Feb 19 2008, 12:06 PM

i attended Daniel Ho paper 3.7 class. i can say he is very good in giving explanation on the calculation n theory. u'll understand the formulae thoroughly n how the formulae/calculation is for. once u understand u can apply it n no need to memorise the formula. its good compared to other lecturer who just ask u calculate n never give explanation. its very tough to memorise everything w/out understanding it.

i have no comment for andrew phang cos i din attend his class. but heard alot of my frens saying tat he very good as well.

of course we (ACCA affiliates) capable to work! if not who capable? i passed my exam is not luck pls. u go play much n go sit for the paper see u got luck to pass o not? totally crab!!!!!!!!!!!!