Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Honda CRV Owner..., Come & let me know how is your car plz..
|
TSSaint_Kawa
|
Dec 6 2007, 08:59 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Aggronax @ Dec 6 2007, 08:24 PM) but currently TS use for off-road.........  wish sure not the option if without tax, I think the Lexus were less than 200k also.  Dude, when I was at Toyota...they told me Prado gonna cost around 173k.... So I assumed that Harrier is totally out of the question.......... I don't wanna spend too much on this car man.......wanna go as low as I can
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggronax
|
Dec 6 2007, 09:04 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Saint_Kawa @ Dec 6 2007, 08:59 PM) Dude, when I was at Toyota...they told me Prado gonna cost around 173k.... So I assumed that Harrier is totally out of the question.......... I don't wanna spend too much on this car man.......wanna go as low as I can oh ~ i see. not sure with the non tax price car ~ sorry ~
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSaint_Kawa
|
Dec 6 2007, 09:37 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Aggronax @ Dec 6 2007, 09:04 PM) oh ~ i see. not sure with the non tax price car ~ sorry ~ Yeah man.......... Now still thinking what should I get.......dammit cause I'm worried of getting a wrong one & regret later on......
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggronax
|
Dec 6 2007, 10:46 PM
|
|
if you say offroad, CRV not really suitable. X-trail .... ok la ~ price also lower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
boyslove
|
Dec 6 2007, 10:50 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Saint_Kawa @ Dec 6 2007, 09:37 PM) Yeah man.......... Now still thinking what should I get.......dammit cause I'm worried of getting a wrong one & regret later on...... alot of people say x trail is a good SUV.. but the new one release in some places.. so up to u
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSSaint_Kawa
|
Dec 6 2007, 11:38 PM
|
Getting Started

|
I doubt they got it here...all the Nissan X-trail here are old stuff....
Except the cars like 350z & stuff.........
|
|
|
|
|
|
andyjyneo
|
Dec 7 2007, 12:48 AM
|
|
http://www.mugen-power.com/street/CR-V/if TS feels that harrier is expensive, maybe fortuner can fit your bill but as for me, a true loyal honda supporter, cr-v still the best
|
|
|
|
|
|
andyjyneo
|
Apr 24 2008, 12:43 AM
|
|
QUOTE(EDD!E @ Apr 23 2008, 11:52 PM) Guys ... what is the FC feedback for below model? Planning to get one.  that's 2nd generation of CR-V, which is powered by K20A4 FC is quite high, but not much power this is why honda ditched DOHC engine and placed R20A
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSsharkteef
|
Apr 24 2008, 01:21 AM
|
|
that model vomit blood. new model nicer to drive. more pleasant.
my dad has both models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JenHuang
|
Apr 24 2008, 01:31 AM
|
|
fc 80-90 full tank can go up to 450km for me not bad car, the outlook nice if modify it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
merzed
|
Apr 24 2008, 01:51 AM
|
Getting Started

|
I tested drive both old model and new model of CRV. I feel new model is more responsive and lighter than old model but I still consider quite heavy. Both also same, minum minyak and underpower probably because of the weight of the body, I tumpang my friend's new crv from klang to genting highlands, full tank gone. For comfortable, I feel ok only. I am looking forward to book CRV when it launched but after test drive, I change my mind. The price for spec is reasonable. If you got better budget, go for harrier 2.4 recond with Japan spec which currently should be around 160k -170k. Highly recommended, superb comfort and quiet with reverse camera, you will see a big difference when you test drive that car. I am going for that vehicle but still saving money for that since insufficient budget. My housemates bought harrier last year, no problem so far and he is happy with it but devil because always convince me not go for showroom car but recond since much more selection.
This post has been edited by merzed: Apr 24 2008, 01:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSsharkteef
|
Apr 24 2008, 03:03 AM
|
|
new crv more stable coz it has 17" rims.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zacevox
|
Apr 24 2008, 03:12 AM
|
|
QUOTE(EDD!E @ Apr 23 2008, 11:52 PM) Guys ... what is the FC feedback for below model? Planning to get one.  only if you can control your right leg with the speed of slow turtle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
andyjyneo
|
Apr 24 2008, 02:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sharkteef @ Apr 24 2008, 01:21 AM) that model vomit blood. new model nicer to drive. more pleasant. my dad has both models. yeah, same here dad is driving 2nd gen wahlau eh QUOTE(merzed @ Apr 24 2008, 01:51 AM) I tested drive both old model and new model of CRV. I feel new model is more responsive and lighter than old model but I still consider quite heavy. Both also same, minum minyak and underpower probably because of the weight of the body, I tumpang my friend's new crv from klang to genting highlands, full tank gone. For comfortable, I feel ok only. I am looking forward to book CRV when it launched but after test drive, I change my mind. The price for spec is reasonable. If you got better budget, go for harrier 2.4 recond with Japan spec which currently should be around 160k -170k. Highly recommended, superb comfort and quiet with reverse camera, you will see a big difference when you test drive that car. I am going for that vehicle but still saving money for that since insufficient budget. My housemates bought harrier last year, no problem so far and he is happy with it but devil because always convince me not go for showroom car but recond since much more selection. harrier is a referred risk for insurance ocmpany R20A vs K20A4 QUOTE(sharkteef @ Apr 24 2008, 03:03 AM) new crv more stable coz it has 17" rims. yup, 17" looks solid
|
|
|
|
|
|
erictham
|
Aug 11 2009, 06:23 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(merzed @ Apr 24 2008, 01:51 AM) I tested drive both old model and new model of CRV. I feel new model is more responsive and lighter than old model but I still consider quite heavy. Both also same, minum minyak and underpower probably because of the weight of the body, I tumpang my friend's new crv from klang to genting highlands, full tank gone. For comfortable, I feel ok only. I am looking forward to book CRV when it launched but after test drive, I change my mind. The price for spec is reasonable. If you got better budget, go for harrier 2.4 recond with Japan spec which currently should be around 160k -170k. Highly recommended, superb comfort and quiet with reverse camera, you will see a big difference when you test drive that car. I am going for that vehicle but still saving money for that since insufficient budget. My housemates bought harrier last year, no problem so far and he is happy with it but devil because always convince me not go for showroom car but recond since much more selection. You must be exagerating the outcome. The distance between Klang & Genting Highlands paling-paling also 100km. Assuming the CRV could take in 50 litres of fuel, that translates to 2km / litre!!?? You must be kidding me!! I bet a Ferrari has better FC than that!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
hitokai
|
Oct 18 2010, 07:53 PM
|
|
hurm ... im driving a 2004 2.4 CRV fully imported from japan? what engine it is using? just bought it tho...
|
|
|
|
|
|
OlgaC4
|
Oct 29 2010, 12:41 PM
|
|
Harrier very very bumpy for the rear passanger. Some japanese fcuk in the car already and then sell it to you. Use the CSI blue light i bet you can see all the sperm around it.
This post has been edited by OlgaC4: Oct 29 2010, 12:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
ahsam1212
|
Oct 29 2010, 03:25 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Since u stated that u doing 40% offroad, i suggest u to get something tougher. CRV, XTRAIL RAV4 are not suitable.
Why not u try out Toyota Fortuner, Mit Pajero Sport. They are much better offroad, cuz hv higher ground clearance. U been through those roads, and i m sure u know what will happen if u drive a car with low clearance. hehe..The feeling is painful.
If u can live with a pick up, suggest u try hilux 3.0. Forget about those city 4x4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OlgaC4
|
Nov 4 2010, 11:34 AM
|
|
Toyota Fortuner is really really a fcuk car better go for Pajero sport.
|
|
|
|
|