I think if you did ZA, you'll know that its not as casual as Blizzard said it is. Considering Blizz said ZG was the next UBRS which it didn't turn out to be.
Actually, other MMOs do have faster patch rates. But I wasn't comparing them with WoW. If you look at the past patches of WoW vs the ones coming out now, it is fairly slower (and buggier). Like I said, it is not due to the game being bad but the fact that Blizz is slowly diverting attention away from TBC, be it to the next gen MMO or WoLK.
As for balancing, well even 5s aren't exactly balanced if you look at it. The standard 2345 team still wins, you can't really slot in other classes without losing a counter and the list goes on. It is balanced to a certain point but at the end, it is not as balanced as one would hope for due to the fact that WoW was originally designed as a PvE game and not a PvP one. Don't forget, PvP was added far later and was never in the original game. Just like the 2345 teams for 5s, 3s are dominated by R/M/P teams so I highly doubt one can say it is balanced.
As for hunters, you really have to look at the way class mechanics work. Hamchook was strong because of one reason (I'll let you guys guess it

) and for the same reason too did Crimsonlocks aka Megatf succeed in 2s. No one's going to cry about 2s not being balanced especially since Blizz admitted that it can never be balanced but the bottomline is still that WoW isn't balanced on the PvP front. Blizz may give excuses that 2s aren't balanced, classes are not designed to go 1v1 but in the end, those are all excuses for PR. WoW wasn't designed for pvp, they slapped on the pvp component and end up having the whole arena balancing nightmare.
If you look at how WAR is being designed with its Archtype system together with Dogs of Wars and other pvp mechanics, THAT is a game designed from the ground up for pvp balancing. WoW just sadly is still a PvE game at heart and is nowhere even close to what DAoC was for player vs player action.
Now don't get me wrong, I think you misintepreted me a tad bit. I'm saying that:
-WoW is definately on a decline, not in terms of popularity/subscriber which you claim it is not (and definately it is not), but in terms of the lifecycle of an MMO. It's just aging and that is normal.
-Evolution of the game is definately slower, not because of the game is going bad but Blizz has shifted attention to newer stuff, WoLK included.
-PvP is hardly balanced. You may not agree with this but a quick scane of the stats and you can see certain classes being grossly under represented compared to others. Arenas work but it is still not what I would call balanced.
-People coming back to WoW? It depends. I've been on 3 servers so far, 2 of them I still play now. Most of the old school WoW heads that levelled with me pre-TBC are gone but in their place, new ones joined. Many I know left for CoH and other games including DAoC. Some did eventually come back but others didn't. Your experience may vary.
-Is WoW dying? Hardly. Will it still be the most popular game 5 years from now? I'm willing to put my 10g on that.
So to the original poster, no the game is not dying in any way. If you enjoy it like me and many others still do, by all means play it. But for me, I have pretty much lost the fanboi'ism that I had a year ago and if a good game comes by, I am more than happy to ditch WoW for another.