i think r680 is a better design than 9800gx2 since it r680 is 2 cores on 1 board...
GeForce 9 series thread
GeForce 9 series thread
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 12:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,506 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Lumpur |
i think r680 is a better design than 9800gx2 since it r680 is 2 cores on 1 board...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 12:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Hyde`fK @ Jan 4 2008, 11:00 PM) GeForce 9800 & 9600 specs and availability why would they release 9600gt when 8800gs is coming out?? there wont be much difference in term of performance and price..1. GeForce 9800 GX2 : 2 x 65nm G92, 256 shader processors, 2 x 256-bit memory interface, 1GB memories, Feb-Mar 2. GeForce 9800 GTX : Replace 8800GTX, Feb-Mar 3. GeForce 9800 GT : Replace 8800 GT, Mar-Apr 4. GeForce 9600 GT : Launch on Feb 14th, 64 shader processors, 256-bit memory interface, 512MB memories, 8600GTS< 9600GT<8800GT, US$169 Source : http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=221448 8600gts<9600gt<8800gt 8600gts<8800gs<8800gt This post has been edited by Amal: Jan 5 2008, 12:59 PM |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 01:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00 |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 01:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,710 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Klang, Selangor D.E. |
But what is mean replace for those 8800gt, is it same spec ?
Man i still havn't grab my 8800gt yet |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 01:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 01:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,104 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Kluang The Bat City.. Johor The Banjir Country.. |
just curious.. r these new product r much better than better product? how bout the price? cannot wait till the price of 8series drop off.. wanna give a try to feel the different of high end GC..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 01:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
10,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: GMT +8:00 |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 02:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,659 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Miri, PJ & KL |
|
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 03:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
448 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
How do you think the performance of 9800 series will compare to SLI 8800 GT or GTS?
|
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 03:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,735 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Malaysia - Swindon Town |
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Jan 4 2008, 12:45 AM) No point having more bandwidth than you can use, external bandwidth is expensive. R600 was a good example of too much bandwidth. You always want maximum utilization of external bandwidth because it is expensive. that's what i've been trying to say.. Nvidia is not skipping GDDR4 for technical or cost reasons, as i have said before. The relatively slow development of GDDR4, the long life and extended development of GDDR3, and the quicker move to GDDR5 is a result of nv skipping it rather than the reason they are skipping it. i personally think those are the reasons they are skipping it.. Added on January 5, 2008, 3:50 pm ![]() at least 580W of PSU needed.. do u think these beasts are wise in power consumption? This post has been edited by emy_xvidia: Jan 5 2008, 03:50 PM |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 04:08 PM
|
|
VIP
15,705 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Tg. Rambutan |
Wah! My wet dream.............................if they deliver on the Quad drivers this time. Last time I waited for the Quad drivers for 7950GX2 until neck oso long. This post has been edited by ianho: Jan 5 2008, 04:11 PM |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 04:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,735 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Malaysia - Swindon Town |
QUOTE(ianho @ Jan 5 2008, 04:08 PM) Wah! My wet dream.............................if they deliver on the Quad drivers this time. Last time I waited for the Quad drivers for 7950GX2 until neck oso long. lol.. your wet dream will soon be reality.. you are sponsored right? i'm not very sure about the driver though.. i thought last time Quad-SLI was a failure.. |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 04:13 PM
|
|
VIP
15,705 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Tg. Rambutan |
QUOTE(emy_xvidia @ Jan 5 2008, 04:11 PM) lol.. your wet dream will soon be reality.. you are sponsored right? ya that's y I had only 1 unit of 7950GX2 coz I was waiting for the Quad drivers to mature n they never did.i'm not very sure about the driver though.. i thought last time Quad-SLI was a failure.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 04:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,659 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Miri, PJ & KL |
More pictures at: http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/01/05/exc...eforce_9800gx2/
The card looks good but if it performs at only 30% faster than 8800 Ultra...sigh...Well, all of them are based upon G92. That kinda confirms that G92 was released early to thwart AMD's HD38xx series. As mentioned before, don't expect GF9 series to be awesome performer compared to G92. |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 04:23 PM
|
|
VIP
15,705 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Tg. Rambutan |
QUOTE(clayclws @ Jan 5 2008, 04:20 PM) More pictures at: http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/01/05/exc...eforce_9800gx2/ That 30% is nothing to be sneezed at. Just imagine in my case. I'm currently playing Crysis at 2560x1600. All gfx settings at Medium. My average FPS is now at 50. If I get 30% more with just 1 card, that gives me a lovely 65FPS. If 2 units of 9800GX2 delivers as promised n I get say about 50% more, that wud b awesome.The card looks good but if it performs at only 30% faster than 8800 Ultra...sigh...Well, all of them are based upon G92. That kinda confirms that G92 was released early to thwart AMD's HD38xx series. As mentioned before, don't expect GF9 series to be awesome performer compared to G92. |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 04:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,659 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Miri, PJ & KL |
QUOTE(ianho @ Jan 5 2008, 04:23 PM) That 30% is nothing to be sneezed at. Just imagine in my case. I'm currently playing Crysis at 2560x1600. All gfx settings at Medium. My average FPS is now at 50. If I get 30% more with just 1 card, that gives me a lovely 65FPS. If 2 units of 9800GX2 delivers as promised n I get say about 50% more, that wud b awesome. If the price is RM2500+, we can forget about that card. Oh, but you are sponsored... |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 05:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,930 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: o( *゚ー゚)┘miao^miao Status: Perm Banana |
we really need to tie our belly belt tighter and take it a pinch of salt when talkin to uncle ian.
looking at the 9 series, i wonder how the 9800gt fare against the infamous 8800gt g92. |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 05:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,659 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Miri, PJ & KL |
QUOTE(don^don @ Jan 5 2008, 05:45 PM) we really need to tie our belly belt tighter and take it a pinch of salt when talkin to uncle ian. infamous ˈɪnfəməs [in-fuh-muhs] - adj.looking at the 9 series, i wonder how the 9800gt fare against the infamous 8800gt g92. 1. having an extremely bad reputation: an infamous city. 2. deserving of or causing an evil reputation; shamefully malign; detestable: an infamous deed. So, 8800GT was such a bad card that it deserved to be labelled infamous? |
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 06:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,277 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: It's a tarp |
Found some pic http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html...W50aHVzaWFzdA==
|
|
|
Jan 5 2008, 06:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,060 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: クアラルンプール > 日本 |
SO big...same size to Ultra.....Rumor say it fasther and greather than 8800Ultra...Ultra now market price is Rm2800.....Hohoho...if great than ultra price sure RM3k above...hohoho...SLI is rm6k Same price to my entire Rig!!!
|
| Change to: | 0.0167sec
0.78
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 09:14 AM |