the products are good. i'm one of the nutritionists working in that company. can ask me for details. however, i hv no idea about the plan. as i know this company is not a 100% direct selling company .

From what i have observed, i BBBEEELIEVE their products are not so good afterall.. Another marketing gimmick / strategy by this company.

today quite free to dig up some old threads and find tis:

i recalled years back when an apek told me exact same thingy is tat all mlm seller having same marketing manual or wat i wonder

i was helping in an engineering company family business own by my father & uncles, one afternoon an apek drop into office claim to be my uncle fren, and tat time nobody around lunch break...
so we chit chat talking and he start telling me arrr how much you can earn arrr,,,,how much ur boss earn arrr.....how stupid to spent ur life earn $$$ for others arrr.....things like tat.
now arr golden oppoturnity..... low capital high return lo.... easi to do..... sky is the limit....onli loser bo hood will ignore.....no guts no glory........
after awhile my uncle call back ask me bring him to stockyard (our office and stockyard diff place), so i bring him, and he saw i drive a toyota harrier, then he started again... ur boss arr purposely give u a better car to keep u work for him,,,,,boss earn alot he giv u little.....u work here enslave ur live lo...onli tis mlm caring lo....giving fair return.....
so last2 we arrived and my uncle introduce me to tis apek say im younger generation successor to tis family biz now im one of incoming director.......
so the apek still can senyum2 say good arr good arr young and capable liao....if join this mlm.....now earn 10k....later can earn 200k lo with ur networks.... (btw, my salary is damn small nia even today, onli hope year end profit from company)
after apek gone i tell my uncle that apek cucuk him all the way kiam siap boss veri evil....
my uncle say arr mlm pipu is like tat la what u expect....

so this billylch earning how much dy today? 30k? 300k? xD if earn 30k also better than me la congratz

borrow his words above :
succeesor create way to success, losers create reason.... arr i like this phrase

Is easy-phamax dead already ? Never heard it recently. The boss is the famous "one-eye see clearly" businessman right ?

i dunno worr
i cant recall the apek's kompeni name dy imo something like two bird red color the logo
i onli remember he keep asking me buy a gel to prevent botak saying arr now young time got hair must jaga else later loss hair botak la ur work veri dirty environment......

Their website still operating so I guess still alive. But definitely not like last time spend a lot on advertising

Just another MLM...

Just in case any one is still reading this forum, latest news on Easy Pha-Max and its holding company from the KLSE website http://www.klse.info/companies/announcemen...5e0d1d716d5c729

"Type : Announcement

Subject : MATERIAL LITIGATION

Description : INS BIOSCIENCE BERHAD (“INSBIO” or “the Company”)

MATERIAL LITIGATION

LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. SC 111260

PLAINTIFFS
1) CHRISTIAN COFFINET
2) FRANK ANNENBERG

vs

DEFENDANTS
1) INS USA INC
2) INS HOLDINGS BHD
3) INS BIOSCIENCE BHD
4) DATUK DAVID YEAT SEW CHUONG
5) WONG SENG TONG
6) EDWARD LING
7) OLA MADSEN
8) SCOTT B. GILES
9) CARMELITA REYES
10) MARISSA CRIS GINES

The Board of Directors of INSBIO (“the Board”) wishes to announce that the Company is involved in a civil suit filed by Christian Coffinet (“Coffinet”) and Frank Annenberg (collectively “the Plaintiffs”) on 28.1.2011 against INSBIO, Datuk Yeat Sew Chuong, Wong Seng Tong and 7 other Defendants (collectively “the Defendants”) bearing Case No. SC 111260 in Los Angeles Superior Court, State of California, United States of America.

Announcement Details/Table Section :


The Company had on 14 February 2012 received a letter from the Plaintiffs’ solicitors, Law Offices of Katherine R. Cohan, APLC together with:-

1. Summons (Amended Complaint) dated 01.02.2012;
2. Summons dated 28.01.2011;
3. Civil Case Cover Sheet dated 28.01.2011;
4. Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location dated 28.01.2011;
5. First Amended Complaint dated 31.01.2012;
6. Notice of Ruling (Case Management Conference) dated 15.11.2011;

(collectively, “the Cause Papers”).

Events leading to the civil suit as pleaded by the Plaintiffs are summarized as follows:
a) The Plaintiff, Coffinet is an individual who had participated in the “INS USA Distribution Centers Programme (DC)” / “INS USA Easy Pha-max Centers Programme (EC)” on INS USA’s standard terms and conditions. INSBIO was supplying the products to INS USA via The Origin Foods Sdn Bhd, one of INSBIO’s subsidiaries. .

b) As pleaded by the Plaintiffs in the Summons, Coffinet joined Mega Inc as an independent distributor in January 2006. The Plaintiffs further alleged that throughout January 2006 until approximately August 2006, INS USA Inc (“INS USA”), INS Holdings Bhd and the Company assumed the assets of Mega Inc and conducted the business under the name of “Mega Inc” and was selling the products of Mega Inc which were essentially health-care products, supplements and so on. On or around August 2007, INS USA, INS Holdings and INS Bioscience ceased using the name of “Mega Inc” and conducted business from that point on under the name of “INS USA Inc”.

c) Coffinet further alleged that in reliance on the representation of the Defendants or their representatives, he had purchased one (1) Distribution Centre and forty (40) Easy Pha-Max Centers upon the terms and conditions set out in the Distribution Center Agreement and Easy Pha-Max Center Agreements executed between INS USA and Coffinet (collectively “the Agreements”).

d) Coffinet also alleged that the Defendants had failed to fulfil their duties and obligations as set out in the Agreements and failed to pay the commission and return on investment as represented by the Defendants or their representatives to Coffinet.

e) The Plaintiffs’ causes of action as set out in the Summons are intentional misrepresentation (fraud), negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of non-compete covenant, promissory estoppels, unjust enrichment, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, Unfair Competition under Business and Professions Code Section 17200 [Unfair Business Act or Practice] and False Advertising under Business and Professions Code Section 17500.

f) The relief sought against the Defendants as pleaded in the Summons vis- -vis each of the cause of action include amongst others, general and compensatory damages in excess of US$963,000, prejudgment interest, consequential damages, emotional damages, punitive damages, monetary damages, loss of profit, economic damages and restitution respectively. The estimated potential liability as evidenced in the Plaintiff’s request for entry of default is at US$1,101,710.00.

INSBIO has engaged Messrs REYES LAW GROUP (“RLG”) of Wilshire Financial Towers, 3600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90010 to defend the suit for and on behalf of INSBIO, its directors, Datuk Yeat Sew Chuong and Wong Seng Tong and INS Holdings.

INSBIO and its directors, Datuk Yeat Sew Chuong and Wong Seng Tong have represented to RLG that the INSBIO does not have any contractual relationship with INS USA nor the Plaintiffs and INSBIO does not have common directors and shareholders with INS USA and as such a proposed step being contemplated is to file a motion for summary judgment at some point shortly before trial, which if successful will get the Plaintiffs’ case dismissed.

RLG is of the opinion that the Plaintiffs’ legal position has no real merit and it will be easy enough to prove that INSBIO’s version of facts is correct. If there is any liability of INS USA to be proven, it shouldn’t create any liability for INSBIO as they have no legal relationship to each other.

INSBIO does not expect to incur any losses arising from the suit and the suit will not have any effect on INSBIO’s financial position and operation.

As at to-date, the Court has fixed the suit for continued trial on 25.2.2013.

Further announcement on development of the above matter will be made to Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad in due course.

This announcement is dated 30 October 2012."

This not ady close Liao meh?

Yala I also heard close dy
So anyone any idea?