Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 BERAK: Naimah asked Court to hide Daim asset bil

views
     
TSMedusakia
post Dec 10 2025, 06:42 PM, updated 4d ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
162 posts

Joined: Mar 2020
PETALING JAYA: The family of the late Daim Zainuddin has obtained a temporary gag order preventing the disclosure of the identities of the respondents and details of the properties in a new Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) forfeiture case.

MACC had applied to the Kuala Lumpur sessions court earlier today to obtain a forfeiture order on properties linked to Daim and his family, Berita Harian reported.

In its application, the anti-graft agency also sought a court order to publish a notice in the Government Gazette, allowing interested parties to appear in court and show cause why the properties should not be forfeited.

The family’s lawyer, Nizamuddin Abdul Hamid, told the court during proceedings today the gag order was needed to protect his clients’ personal information, including their names and bank details.


kcchong2000
post Dec 10 2025, 06:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
Of coz bank account too much sure ada orang "taken" family members whistling.gif
TSMedusakia
post Dec 10 2025, 06:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
162 posts

Joined: Mar 2020
QUOTE(kcchong2000 @ Dec 10 2025, 06:45 PM)
Of coz bank account too much sure ada orang "taken" family members whistling.gif
*
Atok dah lama merancang un bebal akecema je yg lalai🫢😁🤣
MR_alien
post Dec 10 2025, 07:10 PM

Mr.Alien on the loss
*******
Senior Member
3,581 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: everywhere in sabah



the more you tried to cover it up, the more rakyat know it's A LOT laugh.gif
Brotherjoe
post Dec 10 2025, 07:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,215 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Ipoh/Penang/PJ/Melaka
niamah why need to preventing the disclosure of the identities of the respondents and details of the properties?
DarkAeon
post Dec 10 2025, 07:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
774 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(Brotherjoe @ Dec 10 2025, 07:13 PM)
niamah why need to preventing the disclosure of the identities of the respondents and details of the properties?
*
bcoz that would reveal individuals and networks directly or indirectly involved with their gang
ulet
post Dec 10 2025, 07:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


because it is not proven guilty or not yet.
imagine you got millions then macc said your own property is proxy of somebody else and wanna forfeit it.
now judge ask you go court and tell the whole story. because of that your privacy no more liao.
is it fair?
galkelly
post Dec 10 2025, 07:48 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
752 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
Atuk having sleepless night
JoeYoung
post Dec 10 2025, 08:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Nothing to hide konon. Ptui
Roadwarrior1337
post Dec 10 2025, 08:18 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
979 posts

Joined: Jan 2022
Sampah masyarakat

Helang level
Odinn
post Dec 10 2025, 08:41 PM

Say what?!?&!%@
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: K.L.
QUOTE(ulet @ Dec 10 2025, 07:36 PM)
because it is not proven guilty or not yet.
imagine you got millions then macc said your own property is proxy of somebody else and wanna forfeit it.
now judge ask you go court and tell the whole story. because of that your privacy no more liao.
is it fair?
*
True. But they alrrady know the identities and details of Naim and family, those don't need to be hidden anymore. So whose details are they trying to keep hidden, that's the question.
Freshmeat21
post Dec 10 2025, 08:43 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
16 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
If its proven the money is obtained illegally, can confiscate?
boyboycute
post Dec 10 2025, 08:44 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
551 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


Someone probably work very hard in his life. Meanwhile, others are just lazy according to Atuk
Schumacher
post Dec 10 2025, 08:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,161 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(ulet @ Dec 10 2025, 07:36 PM)
because it is not proven guilty or not yet.
imagine you got millions then macc said your own property is proxy of somebody else and wanna forfeit it.
now judge ask you go court and tell the whole story. because of that your privacy no more liao.
is it fair?
*
This case is also good since his wife is getting an answer from the Federal Court. By right, it’s the prosecution’s job to prove the case, not for you to prove that you’re not guilty. That’s the established principle. If your car was stolen and used in a robbery, they can’t expect you to prove you’re not the robber or that you weren’t abetting in the robbery.

This post has been edited by Schumacher: Dec 10 2025, 08:51 PM
jojolicia
post Dec 10 2025, 08:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,922 posts

Joined: Feb 2016
MACC ho-yeh 💪
max_cavalera
post Dec 10 2025, 08:54 PM

rebirth
*******
Senior Member
5,614 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Cyberjaya, Shah Alam, Ipoh



Topkek this is really jurisdiction overreach. This can be politically weaponized to killed of any of your enemy for the gomen of the day.
ulet
post Dec 10 2025, 08:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Odinn @ Dec 10 2025, 08:41 PM)
True. But they alrrady know the identities and details of Naim and family, those don't need to be hidden anymore. So whose details are they trying to keep hidden, that's the question.
*
"In its application, the anti-graft agency also sought a court order to publish a notice in the Government Gazette, allowing interested parties to appear in court and show cause why the properties should not be forfeited."
because it is not yet conlan7firm the properties is linked/proxy to daim yet. later if proven it is not linked, then the owner of the properties privacy no more liao. if they want publish whose property it belong after colan7firm it is linked to daim, then by all means show and tell.

QUOTE(Schumacher @ Dec 10 2025, 08:45 PM)
This case is also good since his wife is getting an answer from the Federal Court. By right, it’s the prosecution’s job to prove the case, not for you to prove that you’re not guilty. That’s the established principle. If your car was stolen and used in a robbery, they can’t expect you to prove you’re not the robber or that you weren’t abetting in the robbery.
*
yup
Schumacher
post Dec 10 2025, 09:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,161 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(ulet @ Dec 10 2025, 08:57 PM)
"In its application, the anti-graft agency also sought a court order to publish a notice in the Government Gazette, allowing interested parties to appear in court and show cause why the properties should not be forfeited."
because it is not yet conlan7firm the properties is linked/proxy to daim yet. later if proven it is not linked, then the owner of the properties privacy no more liao. if they want publish whose property it belong after colan7firm it is linked to daim, then by all means show and tell.
yup
*
So they expect you to declare any illegal assets 😉 instead of the prosecution having to prove your assets are illegal. It’s also a safety issue, since it may involves your family/kids’ addresses, bank accounts, and so on. It’s like you’re already guilty until proven innocent, a new principle under the rocket and AI robot era.
nelson969
post Dec 10 2025, 09:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
321 posts

Joined: May 2020
day by day the country rule like cyberpunk and korea chaebol
Selectt
post Dec 10 2025, 09:39 PM

wattttt!!
******
Senior Member
1,709 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(max_cavalera @ Dec 10 2025, 08:54 PM)
Topkek this is really jurisdiction overreach. This can be politically weaponized to killed of any of your enemy for the gomen of the day.
*
already doing

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0132sec    0.66    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 02:41 AM