Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
So Albert Success Or Not 🤔🤣
|
Schumacher
|
Nov 30 2025, 08:39 PM
|
|
QUOTE(danielmckey @ Nov 30 2025, 02:41 PM) Albert Tei failed because he simply tembak people that he cannot fight. Who is the stupid fella advice him this from behind... Albert is just taking a risk. If PN wins the next ge, he’ll probably turn into a prosecution witness, just like Datuk Zarul Ahmad. PN stands a stronger chance now especially if the Chinese votes swing their way. At least Muh didn’t try to control the judiciary, he was just playing around with the DNAA. Unlike ai, who’s making appointments not based on experience or seniority !
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSipohps3
|
Nov 30 2025, 08:44 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 30 2025, 08:39 PM) Albert is just taking a risk. If PN wins the next ge, he’ll probably turn into a prosecution witness, just like Datuk Zarul Ahmad. PN stands a stronger chance now especially if the Chinese votes swing their way. At least Muh didn’t try to control the judiciary, he was just playing around with the DNAA. Unlike ai, who’s making appointments not based on experience or seniority ! but muh case going to start trial soon and why PN in power will change his role? do you mean political influence on the prosecution here 🤔 and you gave him a pass with just this lame reason 🤣 QUOTE he was just playing around with the DNAA. This post has been edited by ipohps3: Nov 30 2025, 08:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schumacher
|
Nov 30 2025, 08:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ipohps3 @ Nov 30 2025, 08:44 PM) but muh case going to start trial soon and why PN in power will change his role? do you mean political influence on the prosecution here 🤔 and you gave him a pass with just this lame reason 🤣 You need to understand that playing with the DNAA means simply choosing not to prosecute. But when you try to control things by appointing your own macai, not based on experience or seniority, it can seriously affect justice !
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSipohps3
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:00 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 30 2025, 08:55 PM) You need to understand that playing with the DNAA means simply choosing not to prosecute. But when you try to control things by appointing your own macai, not based on experience or seniority, it can seriously affect justice ! choosing not to prosecute means ada udang disebalik batu. and can say political influence on the prosecution side too. why not let court process decide instead of dnaa? also you didn't answer my question 1 regarding Albert and could you say how his jac appointment affect justice? it is just 1 out of 9 in jac that is under direct PM prerogative. This post has been edited by ipohps3: Nov 30 2025, 09:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schumacher
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ipohps3 @ Nov 30 2025, 09:00 PM) choosing not to prosecute means ada udang disebalik batu. and cab say political influence on the prosecution side too. why not let court process decide instead of dnaa? you didn't answer my question 1 and could you say how his jac appointment affect justice? it is just 1 out of 9 in jac that is under direct PM prerogative. 2 la the jac and the cj
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr Jan Itor
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:04 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Syukurlah janji bukan syaitan semenanjung
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSipohps3
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:04 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 30 2025, 09:02 PM) the cj already appointed according to seniority, no? and yet again you avoided the other question. This post has been edited by ipohps3: Nov 30 2025, 09:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schumacher
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ipohps3 @ Nov 30 2025, 09:04 PM) the cj already appointed according to seniority, no? and yet again you avoided the other question. QUOTE AI: Short answer: **no, he wasn’t picked based on seniority.**
Wan Ahmad Farid was a *Court of Appeal* judge and relatively junior in the hierarchy when he was appointed Chief Justice in July 2025. Reports note that he ranked far lower than others in terms of seniority, and was elevated over more senior Federal Court judges and other Court of Appeal judges.
Constitutional experts and news coverage also explicitly said that **seniority is not a requirement** for the CJ post and that his appointment is an example of that — the system allows “leap-frogging” where a less senior judge can be promoted straight to CJ.
So if your question is literally:
> Is the current Malaysian CJ there *because of* seniority?
Then: **No — his appointment clearly went against the usual seniority expectation.** Although karma is untrue, but rocket deserves to lose all seats ! This post has been edited by Schumacher: Nov 30 2025, 09:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knnbuccb
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:06 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Albert tak sedar diri he is not true sabahan
Blood is thicker than water...
End of the day, those ppl rather trust own ppl and kena scam by own ppl rather than bet on others
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSipohps3
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 30 2025, 09:05 PM) Although karma is untrue, but rocket deserves to lose all seats ! ok then what? the cj is not hand picked by PM. it was the jac recommendation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSipohps3
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Dr Jan Itor @ Nov 30 2025, 09:04 PM) Syukurlah janji bukan syaitan semenanjung siapa syaitan semenanjung tu?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr Jan Itor
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:42 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(ipohps3 @ Nov 30 2025, 09:37 PM) siapa syaitan semenanjung tu? Sudah tentu DAP. Hari itu saya jatuh dan mencederakan lutut saya. Saya pun menjerit Celaka ini salah DAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
danielmckey
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:56 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 30 2025, 08:39 PM) Albert is just taking a risk. If PN wins the next ge, he’ll probably turn into a prosecution witness, just like Datuk Zarul Ahmad. PN stands a stronger chance now especially if the Chinese votes swing their way. At least Muh didn’t try to control the judiciary, he was just playing around with the DNAA. Unlike ai, who’s making appointments not based on experience or seniority ! I wonder if he so rich, why not to be like Jholo. Anyway, he is not an honest businessman, always using dirty trick and back door. This post has been edited by danielmckey: Nov 30 2025, 09:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schumacher
|
Nov 30 2025, 10:33 PM
|
|
QUOTE(danielmckey @ Nov 30 2025, 09:56 PM) I wonder if he so rich, why not to be like Jholo. Anyway, he is not an honest businessman, always using dirty trick and back door. QUOTE G. Gnanaraja Datuk Seri G. Gnanaraja is a Malaysian businessman and the key prosecution witness in Lim Guan Eng's ongoing corruption trial. Allegations: Gnanaraja has testified in court that he acted as a "middleman," setting up a company and a bank account at Lim's alleged request to facilitate bribe payments related to the RM6.3 billion project. He claims to have personally handed Lim RM2 million in cash. Albert is actually similar to this guy, but he’s much more daring maybe because he has his atuk’s support.
|
|
|
|
|