So GRS will focus more on taking care of the actual poor inland area where they won?

I say good riddance if GRS actually help their constituents instead of songlap the money

Urban area always more prone to voting opposition yet they still received the most development. You know why?

Because urban area = more projects = more

Your logic is just like voting DAP = more type C in government = more funding for type C like education. And what's the reality?

This post has been edited by bashlyner: Yesterday, 11:35 AM

You guys sort yourself out first.

Our experience tells us that peninsular have superiority mindset no matter what faction.

Hard to work together like that

This post has been edited by Einjahr: Yesterday, 11:45 AM

FYI, type C education all these while already got fundings just it is not official announce due to type-M sensitivity. If you ask those who is in PIBG, usually those who request from goverment side with proper planning/proposal will get some sort of financial support but not 100% (Mostly give around 50%) My parents work in education line so they knew most (C or I) school still got allocation but not 100%, this is still continue from previous goverment. Just imagine if the allocation give way more than the (M) school, what do you think the majority will think about? This is a sad truth that the minority need to suffer.

This post has been edited by littlefire: Yesterday, 11:48 AM

So with 40 DAP MPs you get more or less the same funding as compared to Najib era with only 7 MCA MPs. Now you tell me if minority being in government or not, will make any difference?

Same going to keep quiet because scare of offending the master. 40 or 4 seats all the same only

at the time being, u just tokoking crap.

opposition YBs will not get their yb fund & sentuhan kasih which u had no idea of yet pulling craps out of your backside.

clearly u have no idea how funding works & pusing roti canai.

back to the question, rm300 or rm3000 is better in assisting your welfare?

why dont u answer this question?

Why you need YB fund? State government has much more funding for development. If what you say is true Selangor and Penang should lose to Johor after 2008 because BN is government until 2018.

You just spin to focus on small amount of individual ADUN/MP funding.

Actual development came from budget not from kacang putih MP fund ok? Else you won't see PuAS MP so relax while no funding for many years. They still managed to beat UMNO who has billions of funding

This post has been edited by bashlyner: Yesterday, 12:02 PM

kanasai.. comparing selangor/penang/johor to sabah?

obviously u have no idea how bad is sabah's development.

i rest my case. u malayan are right, more sabahan than sabahan lol

cb, playing piano to a cow

If you can't spin then don't use such pathetic example.

Is Sabah so poor until development need to depend on mere thousands of ADUN funding?

In this case GRS allocate more fund to rural area should be better because rural is even more underdeveloped than urban area.

You arrogant urban nons want to deprive poor rural Bumi from their basic needs? Cukur ada GRS tolong mereka sekarang

this quote alone showing that u totally have 0 / kosong / nil knowledge abt how KPM funding works.

it's not abt number of MPs, it's abt who's inside the KPM.

reli katak dibawah tempurung

anthony not yet resign despite failure after failure

why u want to support these kind of people in politics ?

i don't

This post has been edited by Redhunt: Yesterday, 12:31 PM

Beside failures nothing good ?

The rm50 montly pass is good.

Sabah and Sarawak memang different . Fail history is it?

must be

not compulsory subject meh during your time meh?


This post has been edited by Redhunt: Yesterday, 12:34 PM

not his idea.

aiya

u duno 3 quarters of those in Semenanjung gomen support PAS agenda meh ?

They are just quiet on the public front but behind the scenes, support

Come next GE, DAP will kena kick out of coalition, cause they cannot bring in the needed votes, then will become 90% or something.



This post has been edited by Redhunt: Yesterday, 12:39 PM

You must contest next round.

lol

like a chef saying if you don't like my food, u become chef la.

so childish

i guess that is the DAP mindset today.

This post has been edited by Redhunt: Yesterday, 12:42 PM

Pot calling kettle. Lol

Yes, as they see by data/statistic. Do you know that the type C & I population percentage for overall Malaysia is how much nowadays? less then 30% and going down. So how you explain/justify if their allocation go up but the population keep going downwards? If this were found out by opposition and question in parliament without proper answers it gonna rot the majority support even further by clamming "DAP" or someone from Type C/I in behind controlling the finance ministry (indirectly PM) for their own benefits. This is a very sensitive topic when discuss openly, especially involve other type education funding's as a lot of them still think other type education should not claim government funds.

This post has been edited by littlefire: Yesterday, 01:51 PM

so who's inside the KPM

what are you trying to imply?

so based on your argument, as long as the "deep-state" within the govt still comprises of "their kind"

then it doesn't matter if there's 40 or 140 MP from DAP, the end result would still be the same

the smart and mature Cs already redha and pasrah with the fate, while smartass DAP fags would still want to make PAS and MCA the boogeyman of Cino community

I like him handling MOT. Much better than Tokong handling MOF.

I always repeat, no one leader can satisfy everybody. You don't like him then don't vote for DAPigs only. Simple. I respect your choice, hope you do the same to us Malayans here. Democrazy is about numbers, who has the majority wins. You don't need every vote.