Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
BREAK: DAP KALAH semua kerusi
|
littlefire
|
 Dec 1 2025, 09:22 AM
|
|
QUOTE(taiko8148 @ Dec 1 2025, 10:18 AM) It is more like Warisan left Pakatan and contest all seat in Sabah + west M'sia + Labuan during GE Nov 2022. Pakatan backed GRS happened during Mid Jan -Feb 2023. Everybody know Shafie was Mamak crony where mamak will do anything to stop AI become PM. Yes, those videos come out & bribery claim by some business man you can know they all aim for the opposite of Warisan party. But sadly the video backfire and hit most of peninsular parties (even including PN) and most of the Sabah existing party/personal involved in the videos still win. The sabahan already choose their own homegrown party, lets respect them. |
|
|
|
|
|
littlefire
|
Dec 1 2025, 10:34 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(giftfre @ Dec 1 2025, 10:44 AM) Salah DAP tak kasi duit kpd Sabah voters. Anti Rasuah mindset tak berkesan di Sabah. Party yg lain kasi duit saku 50~100, Roti Gardenia kpd voters. Jadi menang la. Most of DAP supporters are anti-rasuah, but the problem DAP under Pakatan and supported GRS make it very difficult to convince them to vote them back.  |
|
|
|
|
|
littlefire
|
Dec 1 2025, 10:55 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(bashlyner @ Dec 1 2025, 11:40 AM) Really? So elderly actually want more eunuch in government like how how MCA used to be? How's those funding help nons improve their situation?  they complain about 3 things water, electricity, road condition which until today cannot be solve truely now Warisan is on the opposite bloc and majority of the goverment funds will be channel to GRS, things gonna be diffifult for those urban areas. |
|
|
|
|
|
littlefire
|
Dec 1 2025, 11:45 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(bashlyner @ Dec 1 2025, 12:32 PM) So GRS will focus more on taking care of the actual poor inland area where they won? I say good riddance if GRS actually help their constituents instead of songlap the money  Urban area always more prone to voting opposition yet they still received the most development. You know why? Because urban area = more projects = more Your logic is just like voting DAP = more type C in government = more funding for type C like education. And what's the reality? FYI, type C education all these while already got fundings just it is not official announce due to type-M sensitivity. If you ask those who is in PIBG, usually those who request from goverment side with proper planning/proposal will get some sort of financial support but not 100% (Mostly give around 50%) My parents work in education line so they knew most (C or I) school still got allocation but not 100%, this is still continue from previous goverment. Just imagine if the allocation give way more than the (M) school, what do you think the majority will think about? This is a sad truth that the minority need to suffer. This post has been edited by littlefire: Dec 1 2025, 11:48 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
littlefire
|
Dec 1 2025, 01:47 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(bashlyner @ Dec 1 2025, 12:53 PM) So with 40 DAP MPs you get more or less the same funding as compared to Najib era with only 7 MCA MPs. Now you tell me if minority being in government or not, will make any difference? Same going to keep quiet because scare of offending the master. 40 or 4 seats all the same only Yes, as they see by data/statistic. Do you know that the type C & I population percentage for overall Malaysia is how much nowadays? less then 30% and going down. So how you explain/justify if their allocation go up but the population keep going downwards? If this were found out by opposition and question in parliament without proper answers it gonna rot the majority support even further by clamming "DAP" or someone from Type C/I in behind controlling the finance ministry (indirectly PM) for their own benefits. This is a very sensitive topic when discuss openly, especially involve other type education funding's as a lot of them still think other type education should not claim government funds. This post has been edited by littlefire: Dec 1 2025, 01:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0133sec
0.59
6 queries
GZIP Disabled