not the 1st time.
there goes my tax money

of course all MNOs will condemn, because their interests is on shareholders, not the general public. its like all malaysians condemn gov raising tax. nobody like tax hike but necessary given the right situation.

telcos has 4 generations to prove themselves that free capitalism will yield a good cheap price with wide coverage service. but they dont. its time for gov to change the way than keep repeating the same method again and again, hence the DNB. PH don't understand that concept, then they intro 2nd DNB.

dungu.

This post has been edited by letitsnow: Nov 8 2025, 09:50 PM

dnb is not brainchild of pm10. pn punya tahik, fahmi/gobind kena perbetul

So pmx ok je.

Later u turn double turn and restart the same thing again.

so fast lose market share? UMobile5G network is not even accessible yet for most people. only a handful of people able to access it and still under expansion where many areas still don't have UMobile5G coverage.

Diu Nia Ba...

DNB poached staff with 2.5x-3x salary when they started.. after 1 year, cant afford to renew contract...

their staff costs are astronomically not proportionate to their opex

I remember visiting DNB office, everywhere got branded office chair, i think Herman Miller or Haworth which retail price easily over 1k

Dnb was a vehicle for pn gomen to songlup.

monopoly pun can lose money, PMX sudah decide to let private sector take over DNB and form 2nd 5g company by giving to umobile

That's why US trying hard to pressure us not to buy 5g equipment for Huawei for umobile 5g.

why U Mobile got the license but not Maxis? it is because the monarch in the south has link in it

jangan tanya soalan susah meow meow

That's the purpose of government run corporation.


Assign cronies in, take fat paycheck and suck dry the company.

Yeah.

Subsidies moneh just peanuts vs bail out fund

Anak lelaki kutty lettew

Attached thumbnail(s)

Since when DNB was for profit?

Offering cheap per MB costs to telcos, leasing existing telcos infra and starting greenfield both RAN and Core network with one vendor and no second one to leverage against

Their mandate memang for wide coverage and expedited rollout, not commercial gain or even cost efficiency. The exit plan was for telcos to take over by assuming equity when DNB ran its course.

You stick to coverage and freezing out a potential security risk in Huawei as the chief objectives boleh lar

You say second consortium to introduce second vendor screw up their exit plan then make sense la

But you conflating few other things with a whole lot of confidence brother.

A whole lot of confidence

This post has been edited by 9m2w: Nov 9 2025, 01:30 PM

in the process of greasing the wheels, money is being made, just so you know.

letsgobrandon

I tak faham lah

TM and TNB monopoly comms and electric

DNB monopoly what fark? 5G spectrum? Then TM do what fark pulak?

Clearly DNB is a big crony project from the start