Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Habislah Namewee

views
     
ozak
post Dec 19 2025, 11:36 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,024 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


QUOTE(iGamer @ Dec 19 2025, 08:46 AM)
Not sure if US entertainment industry is a fair comparison, many US BLM singers got negative records but still popular.

Anyway, Namewee is not conventional artist relying on  conventional media to publish his songs/mv. His mv on YT alone can put many artists in shame. Not to mention he write his own songs, produce his own mv, pretty much no need to rely heavily on others unlike most pop song singers.
*
You can have negative record, but you cannot publicize it. Once such sensation drama expose, you're done.

He can YT or anything in the net. People want to watch is another matter.

Unless the cause of the girl die is clear.
fanlou
post Dec 19 2025, 11:43 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


huhu, now cannot claim negligence under influence of drug if in court.

#popcorn meme
mick84
post Dec 19 2025, 11:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
96 posts

Joined: Feb 2021
QUOTE(karazure @ Dec 19 2025, 09:37 AM)
Lets assume that the lab did the due diligent and the result is true, all negative.

unker dont belip the lab result can be bought (rasuah) in such a high profile case.

Then, the question will be how accurate is the test kit? and why the police so generously giving out case details so freely?
*
the test kit accuracy is 85–95% per test. Total 3 tests, cos 3 different drugs.
if really all negative, police need to sue the suppliers.

update: from GPT
user posted image

This post has been edited by mick84: Dec 19 2025, 11:47 AM
zlewe
post Dec 19 2025, 03:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
From: Sungai Petani, Kedah.



QUOTE(mick84 @ Dec 19 2025, 11:44 AM)
the test kit accuracy is 85–95% per test. Total 3 tests, cos 3 different drugs.
if really all negative, police need to sue the suppliers.

update: from GPT
user posted image
*
Numbers might be misleading, because they depend on the experiment settings.

Since this is also info from Gemini AI, take it with a grain of salt and DYOR:
QUOTE
Yes, pseudoephedrine can cause a false-positive result on an amphetamine urine drug test (UDT) due to the similar chemical structures of the compounds. A specific study reported a false-positive rate of 75% with one common immunoassay test (Microgenics DRI amphetamine-methamphetamine immunoassay).




TiramisuCoffee
post Dec 19 2025, 03:59 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,256 posts

Joined: Dec 2013
So how his case now? I no follow.
milolauda
post Dec 19 2025, 04:00 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
41 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
why so many k want name wee into trouble ?

they mistaken him as wee car song ?

kek

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0130sec    1.07    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 09:44 PM