PETALING JAYA: The bus involved in the crash near Tasik Banding, Gerik, that killed 15 university students was in sound mechanical condition before the accident, according to an early technical report released by Puspakom.
A post-crash inspection found that the vehicle’s brakes, tyres, steering, and suspension were all in good condition and met safety standards.

“Based on observations and the technical investigation, there was no evidence of mechanical system failure that could have caused the accident.

“Therefore, it is highly likely that the accident was caused by other factors such as human error, road conditions, or similar external factors,” the investigators said in the report.

The report said the air brakes of the bus were in satisfactory physical condition, without any sign of excessive wear. The air compressor tank was also intact without any leaks identified.

The threads of all the tyres were found to have met safety standards. The inspectors also detected no damage in the steering system that could have caused the accident.

It said two sets of leaf springs and shock absorbers were found to be faulty but it might be a result of the crash.

The report also said the bus underwent its last inspection before the accident on April 13 at Puspakom’s Kota Bharu centre, where it was given a “pass”.

Transport minister Loke Siew Fook said appropriate measures will be implemented by the ministry based on the final findings to ensure road safety.


“Meanwhile, enforcement of compliance with safety standards set by the ministry, driver’s qualifications, and the monitoring of the transport company’s operations will continue to be tightened.

“The ministry expresses its deepest condolences to the victims’ families, and it is committed to ensure that such tragedies do not recur,” he said.


https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/...ys-early-report

next, blame the road condition for the accident

need for speed bus edition

kek so driver lied to save himself

so driver kantoi pentipu

Why only bus got accident? That road not suitable for buses?

Driver tu alhamdulillah baik. Ore kito. Mana penah kena saman sepanjang kerjaya

Historically pn kalau xsalah dia bawak 70kmph je

Video tu napok laju sebab mungkin agenda Yahudi busuk hati nak percepat

Cuba kalau dia ada 20 saman, atau bawak 140kmph, confirm la semboyan berbunyi dgn protes kt Sogo. Atau kedutaan merika. Perhimpunan membantah munafik bawak mcm pelesit

No wonder the Minister already ask the driver not to talk reporter /share his taught regarding thr accident

habis lah the driver, tipu to save himself and kantoi

And all those peoplee who die2 back up the driver. Esp talk about the luggage area slighlly openbefore incident

What's the use having so many regulations in place when driver can just bypass it

Why not said salah LGE?

Who/ what can he blame next?

1. DAP
2. PMX
3. Tires

10 Markah

Socmed ppl kan wajib husnuzon bersangkar baek

charged with 15 counts under Section 41(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987, which carries up to 10 years’ jail and a RM50,000 fine upon conviction.

If he is convicted,
15 counts x 5 years jail for each = 75 years

Padan muka lo

This post has been edited by oM41GoD_: Jun 14 2025, 05:04 PM

The driver need witness, will need to depends on the survivors on the bus evidence. Likely habis, but what about the company boss

Salah hantu kad inkambing?

tak tipu bukan.........

belum keluarkan kad salah cina, dap ke?

why not? Let the driver talk to reporter and let him get slaughtered by the media.

nais.. check mate.. hope can impose the heaviest sentence to that sohai driver

salah malam sebab gelap and ai kun mengantuk

Or puspakom lie to save their face. If they said brske not working, people will ask how they pass puspakom test

anyone seen the video would know - he drove above speed there.

he saw the car and panic - then make a hard turn .

justice for 15 dead soul -

his going to jail for sure - so many witness and video + mechanical report lagi .

Nothing surprise. Expected he telling lie at first.

Only Media shows his explanation.

Got which thief can confess steal things?

driver jail or no ar?

Not to defend

Actually brakes if used too frequently for older vehicles example going downhill genting, will fade, overheat and completely not working. But after cool down it will work again normally.

sumbat dlm jail je!!!! biar meringkuk dlm tu

sudah cemas apa pun cakap.. hari itu mesidi dalam sepang gg.. rm1 mil gone.. cakap break tak guna.. putus

then how to verify again by another independent third party?

but if it is really brake issue, i think we wont salah puspakom coz during the test, brake is working n passed.

Passed - doesn't mean must guarantee till certain period?

actually the survivors should be able to give statement that if the brake is really not working, the driver must be panic and told all the students in the bus about this issue.

alrdy many ppl blaming loke....
lmao

sebab org kito, mau shift the blame to company cuz they assume tauke confirm is type C

kantoi dah melayu driver ni

Not even older car. Last time my perodua overheat and brake not working. Mu bad coz nit using L instead of D

this is one thing i was wondering also...

conspiracy theory.... imagine if the bas kampeni actually coffee coffee busbakom..... knowing it wouldnt pass the test .... or because they wanna get things done quickly without any downtime....

but subsequently shit happened...

since bubakom was the recipient of the coffee and also subsequently bubakom also the one who check whetheer got problem.... it is so easy to just say hey everything was OK when we checked on april 13 so everythin ok with the bus... so now it's either driver, road, or some animal jump out in front of the bus.... nothing to do with the bus because we claered it back on april 13 already.

by right they should have sent to an independent workshop to check...

This post has been edited by Knnbuccb: Jun 14 2025, 05:34 PM

"Jangan mengata orang, kito tidak berada di tempat dia, kita takkan paham.."

Later run concurrently, so 5 years only

Leaf spring and absorber might have caused it to flip over

next will blame jin and makhluk halus for blocking his leg from activating the brakes

Lmfao

puspakom not conflict of interest to check their own earlier checks?

Obviously bus driver drove at crazy speed

don't forget good behavior

Before test I already know

Yes, busses need to perform check every 6 month. If puspakom said they are roadworthy for 6 month, then every failure checked by puspakom within 6 month should be under puspakom's responsibility

Driver 18 summons u still believe him or not

Not to argue with you.

In his situation, see the video of he flip over. Then i think nothing can defend.

Dont simply put the responsibility on Puspakom.

Puspakom will decide the period of roadworthy? I dont think so

You do medical check up, doctor will guarantee you can live for next 5 years? If you die, doctors bear the responsibilities?

Doctor force you to check your health in certain time period?

This is obligatory vs self responsibility. Then why we put 6 month puspakom check eligibility if today check tomorrow rosak?

Your point is Puspakom need to bear the responsibilities for the next 6 months before the next checking.

If any accident happens, it's Puspakom fault.

Is it stated in Puspakom checking statement?

If not, why need to blame Puspakom?

In this accident, is it really the faulty spare parts or human careless caused?

I think the answer is so obvious.

Actually what's so difficult

The guy got 18 summons, many include speeding

So how can he be allowed to drive a bus

Not stated but they should. Any failure on whatever puspakom tested should be on them


Puspakom approved brake is roadworthy, then brake failed, then puspakom should be responsible. If not, no use puspakom or not, make it non obligatory as sijil halal.

Cina. Blame Cina.

loke mmg padan kena blame. i believe most of us have high hopes for him.
manatau he is just like any politician before him.

Got a lot summons. Then witness inside bus said he speeding. Now brake ok.

So conlan97firm bus driver lor

You are no wrong for this statement but given the corruption in PUSPAKOM, how can we be certain that it was done properly? This has been always my doubts. Drive the highway and you will see debris of laminated tyres. Likely there are approved by PUSPAKOM and done every 6 monthly. Incredible that tyre can delamniate less than 6 months no?

and thats is why speed limit exist, if the driver drive at low speed chances are the brake system are not overheated.

Kito tak mabok

Kito x tips kito

Kito x salah, brake salah

They should? Now this accident caused by faulty spare parts?

Why not should the driver drive properly instead?

Don't blame the floor too hard if can't shit.

What's so hard for changing a tyre before checking?

Change back the tyre after checking?

Like this also can blame Puspakom?

It is not hard. But it is also possible that PUSPAKOM is part of the cartel. Hence, I always have doubts about PUSPAKOM and its integrity.

The most convenient reason is to blame it on the brake if it's debunk we'll see what other reason he can make.

how did you know?

Sudah bagi chance upgrade career dr grab ke bas driver ada celery tetap, tapi perangai motobodo masih menjadi pulak

this is the root or real problem that government need to address. the problem start here. people too used to drive fast. everyday drive fast hentam all the way above speedlimit. then how the hell, they want to drive slow below 90kmh..where is the logic. this bus speeding will never ending case until everyone need to drive slow

Kalau tak tipu bukan ci....
Ehhhhh






Dah konpuse ni

If u do medical checkup in April and doctor say u got no problem and in June u suddenly got cancer stage 4 like politician because got court hearing...Trust me ... heads will roll.

This post has been edited by Knnbuccb: Jun 14 2025, 08:07 PM

Many here do, die die sokong, well innocent until proven guilty, puspakom report also don't believe, they think puspakom the report is just few sentence only? Of course comes with pictures and analysis le

haha, why like that?

Either way driver n pupakom also type C... kalau tak tipu bukan... oh wai-

All lorry driver kut? Support each other, lorry driver rocks

1994

owai, semua salah type c?

All is speculation for now, police also havent guve any statement.

Puspakom said brake ok
Driver said brake prob
Police didnt say anything yet


My point still stand, an organization tasked to give obligatory roadworthiness certificate should be held responsible if anything happen. If not, they just a wayang organization with no accountabjlity

So hard for puspakom to give marking or paint or somekind of tag to checked hardware? If they accident and found with non compliant tag, then puspakom can release responsibilities

schumacher and hamilton how many crashes?

This post has been edited by nasiputih: Jun 14 2025, 08:29 PM

as interns, we will blame the dicktator maneger

Witness also said driver did stop the bus to check the brakes before the incident. So like he was already sensing some sign of brake problem?

schumacher and hamilton speeding in track, how to compare..

ya, dis bas driver is also speeding

That bus with that driver

Other bus with other driver make it to destination

Death penalty to the driver and company owner please.

got so many witnesses alive
he can't get away from this one

I know a bit about the air brake systems. I am not saying the driver is not at fault, but I think they haven't check the air compressor itself and the 4 way safety valve yet. Hopefully they check these and conclude the investigation soon.

15 summons wowo

How many years he drive? I got 20 plus over 20 years also. Anyway, I rather stick to the facts, investigation results and statements from witnesses especially the ones sitting right behind the driver.

You also know said "suddenly" got cancer, then blame doctor again?

Why did you do in this 2 months for suddenly got cancer?

eyewitness? you mean the victims? dashcam video? all against the driver wor

Yes. The ones sitting right behind the driver. Dashcam video only showing final moment but not the whole 1 km plus going downhil after the driver said brake not working

Anthony follow Puspakom report said the brake still works. Driver said brake problem, any evidence to prove?

You select to believe the one without evidence.

I got nothing to say.

Who can ensure what you did after the checking?

The way the driver jumped the gun from the hospital and let out a statememt that it was the brakes.

He speeding to overtake the dashcam car la

See again the video, the brake light is lighting so mean brake is work.

normal la...many people drive fast then dont manage brake in time then blame brake not good

can already see in this thread that some still wanna defend that stupid driver

18 summons and also the video evidence of him crashing, still wanna believe that dumb bus driver?

now it seems obvious you plotek the driver. Why eh? Almost everything against him. Just balik2 highlight driver's claim of the bus brakes against victim accounts, dashcam video, polis, speeding summon records, heck even his company said nothing wrong with the brakes which is also confirmed by Puspakom.

You saying Puspakom dunno how to check a bus? thats literarily their frigging job!

Zionis

cuba dia xde saman rekod clean 20 tahun...tapi racing lain jenis. da protes n lagi 3 ekor apa nama tue da sound da