Witness also said driver did stop the bus to check the brakes before the incident. So like he was already sensing some sign of brake problem?

Yes many witnesses. And they said

1. The driver stopped the bus to check the brakes before the crash.
2. The driver was shouting that the brakes were not working.

The brakes failing corroborates with the fact the bus was speeding and avoiding cars.

The above 2 evidence are compelling as they represent actual statements soon after the event.

If in fact the bus was sabotaged and there is attempt to cover this up then all subsequent investigations could possibly be biased.

I do not doubt the witness testimony that she heard the driver shouting the brakes were not working. Now why would he do so if that was not true? So there are only 2 possibilities . Either the brakes were truly non functional or he was just pretending to say so in which case the driver is complicit in a plan to sabotage the bus.

Then this leads us to the next unpleasant question as to why Anthony Loke is jumping the gun to make statement on Puspakom finding the brake was functional? Does he know where his mouth is leading him to? Why so quick to brush off mechanical failure as the cause? This is what is reported in the media. I got this hunch there is something not quite right with how this whole narrative is unfolding as if it is scripted such.

.scapegoat? This is human lives we are talking about including that of the driver if he ends up as scapegoat. The govt should seek the TRUTH and not conveniently look for scapegoat. It could have been any of us.

This post has been edited by SharpSword: Jun 15 2025, 01:41 PM