[review]Thermalright IFX 14, king of aircooling
[review]Thermalright IFX 14, king of aircooling
|
|
Nov 21 2007, 06:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
cant wait for the new results, multiple test results compiled for comparison produces better accuracy especially those that are making decisions based on them
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2007, 11:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « thats a good review and most importantly being unbiased just want to know, you think the IFX14 will be able to fit in my antec p180b casing? pic of inside here: http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=Atta...=post&id=335439 |
|
|
Dec 27 2007, 03:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Dec 27 2007, 02:44 PM) Thanks Quazacolt. It's meant to tell others not to expect so much if they plan to get IFX-14. Your casing would be able to fit the IFX-14 and very likely including the back heat sink. hmm good to know then, im not expecting much out of the back heatsink be it fitting or not. so i dont mind, my main purpose is to have the hot air exhausted out and not recycling inside my antec causing heat to build up over time on long CPU loading periods.allenultra, if we're talking about 1.43V, the IFX-14 is better by 4C-5C compared to GeminII. I tried pumping 1.45V and it already hit 60C-62C full load Orthos. Of course a more precise comparison would be to see the heat dissipation at that clock speed as heat dissipation vs voltage increase isn't always linear. The sad thing is, I've no idea how to get the wattage produced at that speed Extra RM180 bucks for +/- 5C difference is a bit too small IMHO mADmAN, the Ultra Extreme has a much better and flatter base. Your explanation has some valid points too and I agree the IHS is not flat (corners tend to be thicker). However if you see the IFX-14 and put it on a glass surface, you can move it left/right (very uneven). as for the uneven surface, it does worry me a bit. and im wondering, would extra thermal paste help? (i use arctic mx2) but then again more thermal paste = more heat "resistance" as opposed to direct heatsink base contact towards the proc heatsink contact. anyone else would like to share their thoughts on thius? |
|
|
Dec 27 2007, 04:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Dec 27 2007, 04:18 PM) thats the prob, on a rm300 heatsink nickel plated shiny shiny and everything, lapping it is like sandpapering your own skin >_<too precious to do so, worse if anything goes wrong on ur lapping (like for whatever reason you make it even more uneven lmao) |
|
|
Dec 27 2007, 06:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(intothefantasy @ Dec 27 2007, 04:53 PM) ya..my TRUE has damage also my IHS...very heartpain...thats y i decided to let d pros to help me lapped (acecombat) oh me godz, uneven to the point that it damage the IHS? definitely no no man, im using a precious qx6700 proc >_<i think ill have to look into lapping the IFX14 too should i get it |
| Change to: | 0.0141sec
0.24
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 07:46 AM |