QUOTE(knumskul @ Jun 11 2025, 05:52 PM)
I am just quoting the law ,you are indirectly implying the law is annoying, which can be considered contempt of court.Trolls on k are law violators
Trolls on k are law violators
|
|
Jun 11 2025, 05:56 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
1 posts Joined: Apr 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 11 2025, 05:58 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#42
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(neutronproton @ Jun 11 2025, 12:08 PM) COMMUNICATIONS AND MULTIMEDIA ACT 1998 Your topic fulfills the criteria of: Section 233. Improper use of network facilities or network service, etc. (1) A person who — (a) by means of any network facilities or network service or applications service knowingly — (i) makes, creates or solicits; and (ii) initiates the transmission of, any comment, request, suggestion or other communication which is obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person; or (b) initiates a communication using any applications service, whether continuously, repeatedly or otherwise, during which communication may or may not ensue, with or without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person at any number or electronic address, commits an offence. (2) A person who knowingly — (a) by means of a network service or applications service provides any obscene communication for commercial purposes to any person; or (b) permits a network service or applications service under the person 's control to be used for an activity described in paragraph (a), commits an offence. (3) A person who commits an offence under this section shall, on conviction,be liable to a fine not exceeding fifty thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year or to both and shall also be liable to a further fine of one thousand ringgit for every day during which the offence is continued after conviction. - creates - a comment which is "offensive" (calling people troll) - with intent to "annoy" the "trolls" uh oh |
|
|
Jun 11 2025, 06:00 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
1 posts Joined: Apr 2022 |
QUOTE(silverhawk @ Jun 11 2025, 05:58 PM) Your topic fulfills the criteria of: nope, Troll has its definition, check any established dictionary like oxford dictionary.- creates - a comment which is "offensive" (calling people troll) - with intent to "annoy" the "trolls" uh oh I didn't create the law, I am just quoting it. |
|
|
Jun 11 2025, 06:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
784 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(neutronproton @ Jun 11 2025, 05:56 PM) I am just quoting the law ,you are indirectly implying the law is annoying, which can be considered contempt of court. That's based on your interpretation. Can't even interpret my post, you really think you interpret the law correctly?You literally are part of the criteria of the law posted. |
| Change to: | 0.0126sec
0.70
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 04:20 AM |