Wait few more day maybe will reach you.

Yes, it's Honor, orange in colour. Thanks. Nowadays my memory is not so good. I will forget about something say early today, but later in the afternoon or tomorrow I will recall it.    Will check on the video quality of the original file later to see if it's much improved in quality compared to the one sent on Whatsapp which is really poor. As far as I recall, the picture and video quality of Honor phones is not very good.

I'm not sure about the earlier debate as it seems like a one-liner "100X zoon is useless" etc. without much context. So I don't really know what is the 'actual' message that is to be conveyed. Anyway, that's not too important since all that's important for me is the X300 Ultra.  As far as I know, the X200 Pro and Ultra should be very good already since I regard my X90 Pro to be good already. The X200 Pro should be better than X90 Pro I presume.

I'm not sure what is the argument about between Azhar75 and Chongkiatz and don't understand the actual point Azhar75 is trying to make here. If I'm guessing, the X200 Ultra is said to be lousy when compared to competitors?

Anyway interesting discussion here so I'll add a little here. Regarding post-processing of photos after the image is taken by the phone, I have never done post-processing and will never be interested although I get to know people do that with Lightroom software about 20 years ago when cameras in smartphones during those days were in their infancy with outdated technology.

I don't know about the X200 versions but my X90 Pro has this Auto-adjustment feature whereby after a photo was taken by the phone, one can select the "Auto" feature and the phone will automatically adjust the image quality (exposure, brightness, contrast, highlights etc.) to produce the best image quality. There isn't any need for the user to manually adjust the brightness or contrast to improve the picture. This is specifically useful when the photo has poor image quality when taken in low light conditions. If the photo does not look bright enough, the 'Auto' feature will automatically make the image look brighter and clearer with better clarity. IN other words, it may be a cheap version of post-processing by using this Auto feature.

The image below shows the Auto feature of the X90 Pro where it will automatically adjust the settings to produce an improved picture quality when selected.



I'm still waiting for the X300 Ultra with anticipation. 

Nowaday phone getting better sensor + better SoC , hence it request less "Processing" and can make the photo looking more and more better , in old day , sensor not that good and lot of china company will doing heavily processing in the backgound , that make the output look overly "FAKE"

PP is like girl make up & plastic surgery , it can be look bad & good depend on the person skill , like u choose which company have your liking about the processing output , some might like xiaomi leica output , some like Oppo Hasselblad output , quite depend on personal reference instead of which company is "bad".  Macam iphone is totally look "RAW" and u need spend sometime to PP the photo to look better 
vivo VIVID mode straight out of camera isnt natural , it do add some contract / brightness / saturation , to look the picture POP , suitable for people who just want point , shoot , and share to social media without headache editing , but some ppl might find it's too contrast but some ppl might like , really depend on situation , because no any mode can fit all , like professional camera man also need doing testing and tuning for different scene and lightning.   
Besides subject & composition , "moment"  also very important , because once u miss the moment, then hardly to get 2nd shoot    Enjoy shooting 

Was gonna get the x300 pro cn set, but saw Vivo Malaysia start teasing the global set. Saw some rumor saying the Malaysia set will be around RM4.8k for 16/512GB (CN model at 3.9k according to fastech). Want to ask is the additional cost of nearly RM1k worth it to get global/Malaysia set vs cheaper CN set?

Well I don't care about the warranty part, but a phone with network problem will be a deal breaker. Guess I should just spend the extra rm1k for malaysia set instead of taking risk and face all those problem.

Right, I have some time now so have included some comparisons taken from the YouTube video above. I have picked few photos which look noticeably different, no videos obviously.

In this photo below, the text on the garbage bin between the Oppo and Vivo look quite different as if they are not the same. Weird! On the Oppo it looks like there is a rectangular box around  the text. Can someone explain why the text looks so different between the two? 

...

Thanks for this. I should have guessed so earlier. In other words it's digital 'post-processing' that's badly implemented. Not too sure if I understand the comment on 'early model of waifu2x' though if it is referring to the looks of the Oppo, I do feel the camera module made the phone looks cheap and ugly in comparison to the Vivo with the symmetrical round piece housing the cameras at the back. I have always preferred phones which have a symmetrical layout of the cameras and not those which have lopsided ones with a slight protrusion from the body of the phone, indicating a small sensor. I don't mind phones which come with a reasonably thicker protrusion to house larger sensors of the cameras.

I hope the Vivo X300 Ultra will have an upgraded camera performance from the X300 Pro.

i think is user error that blurry photo...

i have not seen such bad x9p sample... best to look at more comparison and example

v is using the better sensors that is for sure...