Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Masuda CX-60-RM200k, no new inline 6 engine kek
|
SUSSam Loo
|
Jun 6 2025, 03:52 PM, updated 7 months ago
|
New Member
|
https://mazda.com.my/bookcx60offered in a sole 2.5G 2WD High variant. According to the price list on the ROI page, this variant is estimated to retail for RM200,510.40 on-the-road without insurance – the previous RM198,900 figure advertised by dealers is before OTR costs. For more info, visit paulvinder's site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSSam Loo
|
Jun 6 2025, 03:53 PM
|
New Member
|
ktard here say Masuda better than BMW
|
|
|
|
|
|
pandah
|
Jun 6 2025, 03:53 PM
|
|
Means what? Low fuel efficiency compared to new one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
guest54321
|
Jun 6 2025, 03:55 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Mazda really said ‘premium SUV’ and gave us a shoe box with LED headlights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oM41GoD_
|
Jun 6 2025, 03:57 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Can get any new car with inline 6 engine, for rm200k?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cYus
|
Jun 6 2025, 03:57 PM
|
Getting Started

|
i had to login just to reply,
gosh so ugly
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 Degree South
|
Jun 6 2025, 03:58 PM
|
|
ok mr.mercedes
|
|
|
|
|
|
MyProLife
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(oM41GoD_ @ Jun 6 2025, 03:57 PM) Can get any new car with inline 6 engine, for rm200k? nah, thanks to road tax system. you better off with EV that much better than i6/v6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similanjau
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:10 PM
|
New Member
|
wen mau bankrupt ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSSam Loo
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:11 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(oM41GoD_ @ Jun 6 2025, 03:57 PM) Can get any new car with inline 6 engine, for rm200k? Then bring up the price to 250k-300k la. This car has a naturally aspired 2.5 engine. The CX-5 2.5 TURBO is going for RM188k or something. That's like 12k cheaper. I don't understand the purpose of this vehicle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oM41GoD_
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:17 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Sam Loo @ Jun 6 2025, 04:11 PM) Then bring up the price to 250k-300k la. This car has a naturally aspired 2.5 engine. The CX-5 2.5 TURBO is going for RM188k or something. That's like 12k cheaper. I don't understand the purpose of this vehicle. Tak boleh compare CBU with CKD Itu RAV4 CBU also more expensive than this
|
|
|
|
|
|
tifosi
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:22 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Sam Loo @ Jun 6 2025, 04:11 PM) Then bring up the price to 250k-300k la. This car has a naturally aspired 2.5 engine. The CX-5 2.5 TURBO is going for RM188k or something. That's like 12k cheaper. I don't understand the purpose of this vehicle. Don't say the inline 6. If they launch the 2.5 for 188k and the 2.5T for 200k, still acceptable but 2.5NA for 200k? Good luck to your slow death.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mpyw
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:31 PM
|
|
2 years too late and with that puny 2.5NA.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
staticxtreme
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:32 PM
|
|
wah bye bye jap legacy automakers
|
|
|
|
|
|
zenix
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:40 PM
|
|
lol they still gambling when jaina and the world moving on
|
|
|
|
|
|
submergedx
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Sam Loo @ Jun 6 2025, 04:11 PM) Then bring up the price to 250k-300k la. This car has a naturally aspired 2.5 engine. The CX-5 2.5 TURBO is going for RM188k or something. That's like 12k cheaper. I don't understand the purpose of this vehicle. if you dont understand then stick back with your camry je
|
|
|
|
|
|
smallcrab
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:43 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Becum so ugly
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jwang
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:43 PM
|
New Member
|
i read Paultan few years back news , it said 3.3 inline 6 gonna cost us ~RM250k , are u ok with the price
|
|
|
|
|
|
rcracer
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:43 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Sam Loo @ Jun 6 2025, 04:11 PM) Then bring up the price to 250k-300k la. This car has a naturally aspired 2.5 engine. The CX-5 2.5 TURBO is going for RM188k or something. That's like 12k cheaper. I don't understand the purpose of this vehicle. Bigger , more premium RWD car Buyers have been saying they want more high level than Cx5 but cx8 and cx9 too old already. The CX60 fit the profile for those wanting more space more premium than compact 5 seater.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sexysarah1992
|
Jun 6 2025, 04:45 PM
|
|
Sougly and kosong for 200k.
Crv hybrid is so much better
|
|
|
|
|