QUOTE(Najibaik @ Jun 6 2025, 09:57 AM)
what happen to last year or last 2 years anak tun declare asset to maccno news since then
Official: Ilham Tower owned by Daim seized
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 10:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,365 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 10:24 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 10:25 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
877 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Kuching |
Madey used this fella to loom after his assets
Real owner is madey |
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 10:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,365 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 10:29 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 10:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,365 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 11:37 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
162 posts Joined: Mar 2020 |
QUOTE(fongsk @ Jun 6 2025, 03:38 AM) I already told you. Smokescreen to his immunity case. And if once the trial starts, u can likely see more controversies happening to deflect attention to his case. Let’s wait and see. With or without this seizure asset his court case still going on, it is not like happening today. It has been ongoing since 2021 almost 4 years continuously tell us how suddenly becomes smokescreen🫢😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 |
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 11:42 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
162 posts Joined: Mar 2020 |
QUOTE(icemanfx @ Jun 6 2025, 06:07 AM) No one will abuse AMLA. You need to prove how you get RM 2.5 billion to buy this asset. As long as you declare income and coming from legal source not cuci duit then AMLA can’t be simply use to charge you. The fact that this penipu Daim in the first place refused to declare his asset speak great volume he got something to hide🫢😂🤣 |
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 11:43 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(Medusakia @ Jun 6 2025, 11:37 AM) With or without this seizure asset his court case still going on, it is not like happening today. It has been ongoing since 2021 almost 4 years continuously tell us how suddenly becomes smokescreen🫢😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 That is NOT AMLA right? That is a different case as you had mentioned earlier. |
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 11:43 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
848 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 11:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
569 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
those are mathir money lah.
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 11:47 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,872 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: Singapore & KL |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 11:48 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
846 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 11:48 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
162 posts Joined: Mar 2020 |
QUOTE(fongsk @ Jun 6 2025, 11:43 AM) Any assets or monies you cannot prove from legal income is considered money laundering. More assets hidden in other countries coming soon🫢 Nihonmaru liked this post
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 11:49 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
206 posts Joined: Aug 2021 |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 12:01 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(Medusakia @ Jun 6 2025, 11:48 AM) Any assets or monies you cannot prove from legal income is considered money laundering. More assets hidden in other countries coming soon🫢 The first one is not related to AMLA right? As you said. That’s why the tower is released. Now the second one is AMLA. Diff section of the offence, unless I mistook you initial response to me. You mentioned AMLA investigations takes years and the earlier release tower was under difference act. Pls correct me if I am wrong. |
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 12:03 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(kenny B @ Jun 6 2025, 11:48 AM) how to convict a dead person wor... if cannot get back illegally obtained assets then they keep for free? If my recollection was correct, MACC had wanted to close off the case since Daim’s demise. The widow disagreed. And what transpired later, cannot recall. It was widely discussed and commented here in the forum. |
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 03:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Penang |
QUOTE(KenM @ Jun 6 2025, 04:26 AM) KenM liked this post
|
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 07:23 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
162 posts Joined: Mar 2020 |
QUOTE(fongsk @ Jun 6 2025, 12:01 PM) The first one is not related to AMLA right? As you said. That’s why the tower is released. Now the second one is AMLA. Diff section of the offence, unless I mistook you initial response to me. You mentioned AMLA investigations takes years and the earlier release tower was under difference act. Pls correct me if I am wrong. It is common sense if you cant explain the source of your asset the authority has the power to confiscate. Not only MACC even police can forfeit your property if the assets belong to illegal activity example you earn money from selling drug then your luxury car bungalow land bought can be seized and forfeited unless you prove otherwise. The ball in the person who acquires the property to prove his assets earned from legal income otherwise gg🫢😂🤣 |
|
|
Jun 6 2025, 07:50 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#80
|
![]()
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Apr 2007 |
QUOTE(Medusakia @ Jun 6 2025, 07:23 PM) It is common sense if you cant explain the source of your asset the authority has the power to confiscate. Not only MACC even police can forfeit your property if the assets belong to illegal activity example you earn money from selling drug then your luxury car bungalow land bought can be seized and forfeited unless you prove otherwise. And I agree. But this AMLA is diff from this first case as you said earlier, when I mentioned why do it twice…. Remember? That’s why I said got porn behind the rocks and the points hiding the immunity issues. The ball in the person who acquires the property to prove his assets earned from legal income otherwise gg🫢😂🤣 I am all for confiscation of the tower based on AMLA. But I am wondering WHY they do this second time. |
| Change to: | 0.0171sec
0.90
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 02:45 AM |