Give the young generation a reason to respect? They basically created laws that authorize such practice and a moral code that glorifies it.

kek jangan tanya soalan susah versi soviet sarawak

Sarawak stable because ‘divisive’ DAP not in state govt, says Sim
https://www.msn.com/en-my/news/other/sarawa...sim/ar-AA1FzmaV

Corrupt politicians in Sarawak and rich tycoons will also be very happy.

But now they start to enforce subsidized gas can't be used for commercial activities, already ramai ktards start bising pasal tongkat mereka.

TNB also uses Petronas subsidized if not mistaken.

This post has been edited by smsid: May 28 2025, 08:25 AM

Thats why they say no DAP stable........lol!

This post has been edited by COOLPINK: May 28 2025, 08:30 AM

let's give ah loke 48 hours to comment

later ahloke can tell them

wait sarawak pull out from unity baru tahu

then ah loke need fly go there apologies

macam that time dap go sarawak apologies cause ah eng said them bankrupt

later got beruk from sabah sarawak will said shit like

"semenanjung rape SnS"
"peninsular pipu all penipu scammer"

pundeklaa diuuuu...your people kena con by own politicians since aeonss lar kanasai..kek

I can see slowly Sarawak go bankrupt….and blame Dap and semenanjung.

sarawak already diuz DAP

waiting DAP to comment

sure dare not

how did DAP lose this big pie of sarawak, i cannot brain lah

Ah Loke most probably too busy selling license plate la......

DAP Sarawak can speak for themselves lol

let see what DAP sarawak said in 48 hours or quiet

No DAP in the central government?

Next time they'll hide it under some other account. LOOOL

Not bad already that they budgeted it in the first place.

aik this one touristking tak masuk protek2?

butts hurt money not going to Malaya?

DAP Sarawak Chief: RM100 mln air-charter bill for Premier dept ‘more than double’ entire federal cabinet’s overseas trip costs
By DayakDaily Team

KUCHING, May 28: The Sarawak government’s RM100 million allocation for overseas trips’ expenses this year is “more than double” the RM44 million spent by the entire federal Cabinet in 2024, says Democratic Action Party (DAP) Sarawak chairman, Chong Chieng Jen.

Chong, who is also Padungan assemblyman, made the comparison in response to justifications put forward in the Sarawak Legislative Assembly (DUS) today, where his motion to debate ministerial overseas expenditure was dismissed under Standing Order 86.

According to Chong’s statement, he was denied the floor to debate his motion, while Kota Sentosa assemblyman, Wilfred Yap, was allowed to speak.

“In what seems to be a planned charade, he (Speaker, Tan Sri Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Awang Nassar) allowed ADUN for Kota Sentosa to speak on the motion without even allowing me, the mover of the motion, to start the debate on the motion,” read the statement.

Chong also slammed the justification raised by Yap during the sitting, that he should instead ask the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, about the federal ministerial travel expenses, pointing out that such data is already publicly available.

“If the federal government can reply (to) such a question in Parliament, there is no justification why the State government cannot reply (to) such a question in DUS,” he said.

He pointed out that the RM100 million under Sarawak’s Supplementary Supply (2025) Bill is allocated specifically for “rental for air-chartered services” under the Premier’s Office alone, a figure that does not even include expenses incurred by the other ten State ministers or 26 deputy ministers.

Chong also questioned the Speaker’s rationale that the spending is justified by foreign investment inflows, highlighting a stark contrast: while Malaysia as a whole attracted RM378.5 billion in investments last year, Sarawak’s share stood at only RM14.12 billion (3.7 per cent) of the national total.

“How does that justify our spending being disproportionately higher than the federal government?” he asked.

Chong’s motion, which was rejected this morning, sought to review and overturn an earlier decision by the Speaker, who had disallowed a question on travel expenses during the sitting.

His motion was dismissed as “flawed”, as its contents pertained to a matter previously raised by Pending assemblywoman, Violet Yong.

Beyond the issue of standing, Asfia also cited procedural failings, including the motion exceeding the 250-word limit set by parliamentary practice. The motion contained 411 words.

In addition, the motion was also ruled to have failed to comply with the notice period stipulated under Standing Order 23(1).

The motion, dated and received May 27, 2025, was submitted just one day before the sitting, falling well short of the ten-day minimum requirement.

On May 21, 2025, the matter, raised by Yong was rejected on the grounds that it contravened public policy.

On May 26, 2025, the question was disallowed for the second time based on the Machiavellian doctrine that the end justifies the means, and that, given the scale of foreign investments, the question was disallowed and leave was given for the minister’s refusal to answer. –DayakDaily

Source: https://dayakdaily.com/dap-sarawak-chief-rm...eas-trip-costs/

Same person for judge, jury, and executioner: what could possibly go wrong?

Dewan Sarawak Speaker dismisses Padungan rep’s motion to review ruling as flawed under Standing Order 86
By Marlynda Meraw


From left: Chong, Asfia, and Yap at DUS sitting on May 28, 2025.

KUCHING, May 28: The Speaker of the Sarawak Legislative Assembly (DUS), Tan Sri Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Awang Nassar, has dismissed a motion submitted by Padungan assemblyman, Chong Chieng Jen, citing multiple procedural and substantive breaches under the Standing Orders of the Dewan.

The motion, brought under Standing Order 86, was deemed “flawed” by the Speaker, who invoked his constitutional authority to interpret the rules of the august House.

Quoting directly from the Standing Order 86(1), Asfia affirmed, “The decision of the Speaker upon any point of interpretation of any of these Standing Orders, or upon any matter of practice, shall, subject to a substantive motion for that purpose, be final.”

He ruled that Chong’s motion lacked legal standing and procedural compliance, noting that its content pertained to a matter raised by Pending assemblywoman Violet Yong.

“It is for the member of Pending to seek a review of the ruling made by the Chair, not for the member of Padungan,” Asfia said, adding that the Padungan member, Chong, was not “privy to question” the matter.

Beyond the issue of standing, Asfia highlighted further procedural failings. The motion, he said, had exceeded the permissible word limit as set out in parliamentary practice.

“Any motion must not exceed 250 words. This motion contains 411 words and therefore, should be rejected,” he said, referencing the 24th Edition of Erskine May, page 398.

In addition, Asfia also ruled that the motion failed to comply with the notice period stipulated under Standing Order 23(1).

The motion, dated and received May 27, 2025, was submitted just one day before the sitting, falling well short of the ten-day minimum requirement.

“This is not exactly 10 days to comply with Standing Order 23(1) by any stretch of the imagination,” he said during the eighth day of the DUS sitting today.

Earlier, Chong had presented his motion under Standing Order 86, seeking the House’s consideration, review, and overturn of the Speaker’s decision to disallow a question submitted by Yong regarding the detailed expenses of Sarawak Premier Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Abang Johari Tun Openg and Cabinet ministers for official overseas trips.

Chong cited discrepancies in the Speaker’s responses, pointing out that on May 21, 2025, the question was rejected on the grounds that it contravened public policy.

On May 26, 2025, the question was disallowed for the second time based on the Machiavellian doctrine that the end justifies the means, and that, given the scale of foreign investments, the question was disallowed and leave was given for the minister’s refusal to answer.

Chong added that the Speaker’s rejection showed a lack of appreciation for the extent of expenditure involved in the official overseas trips, especially when the House was asked to approve the Supplementary Supply (2025) Bill for an additional RM100 million under the Premier’s Department for air-chartered services.

In response to Chong’s motion, Kota Sentosa assemblyman Wilfred Yap stated that the assertion was “misplaced” and “misleading” in suggesting that the Speaker’s decision “interferes” with the duties of assembly members.

Yap concluded that the Speaker’s decision to disallow the question regarding overseas expenditure is procedurally sound, justified by concerns of public policy and confidentiality, and reflective of responsible legislative leadership.

“The motion under Standing Order 86 brought forth by YB Chong is legally weak, procedurally unsound, and politically charged and was correctly rejected in full,” he said. –DayakDaily

Source: https://dayakdaily.com/dewan-sarawak-speake...nding-order-86/