More stupidity from pmx. Why the hell we need nuclear when there is palm oil biomass, solar and hydro? Clean and renewable.
Looks like this was decided time ago as the price for Russia to take the blame for mh17.
Incoming: imported Chernobyl 2. Which state will be the lucky one.? Hope Penang.

Do you know nuclear reactor has advance so much that it is very safe to operate. Just let nuclear expert run the show

Biomas, hydro mana cukup bro. Malaysia hosting ai digital centres, industrial factories, etc. Going to need more energy in the future.

OK if Thorium reactor...

Are you gonna apply the vacancy at the reactor? Head of OSHA.

Nuclear is considered as green or clean power generation cause they dont produce carbon. Downside is really need good nuclear waste disposal facilities.

Malaysia being a general safe zone from natural disaster is actually good to have nuclear power plant. Just that Malaysia lack of maintenance culture is the worrying part.

For those always against this would be the same pple who are always against technology and advancement

This post has been edited by neo_grayfox: May 15 2025, 07:47 AM

Kelate is most ideal with sparse population n not much economic value.

Nuclear fusion!!! LETS GOOOO!!!!

also thorium

🍟🍷👀

But this country expert all perfer go other country....
Left those half baked expert .....
Lorry problem also cant manage to settle...

Just leave it alone in desert with plenty of salt. Can operate on its own. Thorium is safe too. I paid attention in my physics class last time

Do you know a lot of petro chem companies store carbon waste here?

https://bimp-eaga.asia/article/indonesia-ma...on-storage-hubs

Perlis la
6 person only....
Anything happen no much lost....

Put it at Putrajaya bestest

On the contrary, I'd suggest putrajaya.
At least force the gov to be more vigilant with the operation and upkeep.

This post has been edited by Rusty Nail: May 15 2025, 07:57 AM

i know one state in malaysia that desperately needs this

Let me guess, it is from Songlap France

This post has been edited by azbro: May 15 2025, 07:58 AM

Carbon and nuclear storage are totallt diff thing and level wei…
But then im not against nuclear power plant here..
In fact ita good to have advancement, we should have a nuclear power plant..
In fact many do not know Malaysia already have a nuclear research facility for many many years already..

Dulu the radioactive stuff hilang, sudah jumpa belum?

Energy is building blocks of country

Corporate can buy carbon credit from. SG.

Looks like a lot of replies here feel the cancer rate and burden in this country not high enough. Can still throttle the carcinogens into the environment.

Looks like a lot of replies here feel the cancer rate and burden in this country not high enough. Can still throttle the carcinogens into the environment.

Lorry got problem meh? What problem? 😎

Or Parliament.

Yes they are different. But waste is still waste. We have problems with trash. Another waste. Dealing with carbon waste. Another thing. Now have to deal with nuke waste.

Our country ain't that big enough. Whats more the reason SEA are chosen to store waste is because we have a lot of trees.

Now imagine you have to clear lots of land to store either carbon or nuke waste. Those things are underground for 100 years. No one would know if it leaks into soil or not.

My boy here think carcinogens is our biggest cancer source in malaysia lmfao

There’s a bigger cancer in Malaysia and it’s spreading faster than radical cells let me tell you this 🫢

Hope penang gets it. And as incentive give free electricity to those within 50km radius of the plant

It's a viable option to address our depleting hydrocarbon resources. Capex is about 10X of solar though.

lay off the idiot sandwich for a while.

you know malaysia been running nuclear reactor since 1982?

true the constant flood waters will help cool the reactors

and the staff can enjoy free teh tarik with minor radiation

win win situation

With nuclear in the picture, we can implement ev better and this will remove one of the biggest source of carcinogens.
The only thing it won't remove is ignorance.

Should join venture with Indonesia and put in Riau Island, in between Peninsular and East Malaysia.

malaysia can get ready for this
maintenance all can do one....

it's the people that's the problem now lol
this bunch of rojak population hard to manage

in competent hand
our style is alibaba and the cheapest sub sub sub con intern do the work

i suggest put at PAS state since they wan jobs

Long time ago, I had a chance lawatan sambil belajar. The proposed location at that time is bukit merah ipoh

should use French tech instead of Russian

gg tnb

1 at selangor
1 at johor
1 at penang

Kaw dim we solved electricity issue

learn from french, their waste disposal is pretty good. the wastes are made into solid blocks

ts is getting stupidier day after day

How dare you not consider those lifes of Thai mois that live next door?

Thaimoi > Perlis

Owaiii...

nuclear expert from abroad - maybe
local 3rd world pay-peanuts-get-monkeys expert - Welcome to Nuclear Swamp land radioactive theme park !

This is where clarity is needed in the thinking of the rakyat as we are faced with 2 apparent kinds of evil. One kind that undermines public well being and safety through policy making that is entrenched in conflicts of interest. On the other hand some feel their moral and religious liberty is being threatened. Which is worse? Let him who has a brain to think figure it out.

Learn from murica or British la. They got no serious incident so far

once upon a time hu ha about lynas, now this is more radiation

If done right, nuclear energy is one of the best sources of energy that is available to us right now. Solar and wind are unpredictable. Hydro is damaging to environment.
We should definitely have renewable yes. But nuclear is one of the best stable, controllable source of energy.

The nuclear waste problem is often overblown. Most people don't know how little waste there is and it's typically stored on site. If we learn from the French where they reprocess spent fuel, the amount of waste is really miniscule.

This post has been edited by godhpf: May 15 2025, 10:48 AM

Don't be an @5swipw. Nuclear is a must.




Don't bodo clean energy must accept nuklear soon we will use fusion from Chyna selamat digunakan.


Even if meltdown biar. We make a plant near Singkiepork sahaja let them protest. Blow then they die Southern state die.

US don't reprocess their spent fuel though. So not an ideal side to learn from. I think UK stopped or planning to stop reprocessing too.

+1.

Bcoz this place use a lot power..

Just so TS know, palm oil biomass is a no no as far as western opinions is concerned. Palm oil itself is bad for environment, so the west not gonna count the biomass as green energy.

As for solar, please force solar installers to lower price lah. The panels are supposed to be cheap because the suppliers are forced to flood the market as they lost the western market.

Red Alert soon

Page 3 already but no one highlight basic point.

A huge chunk of Bolehland electricity is generated by coal. That's the worst kind of polluting source for electricity generation.

If can switch to other fossil fuel source, long ago already switch.

Ok to burn coal until when?

https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/202...minister/168785

There is only 1 other source that can match coal's low cost electricity generation. No prizes for guessing which source.

This post has been edited by takbodoh722: May 15 2025, 11:25 AM

Coal has been around for many decades and its dependency will not go away just because someone found a new source of energy

Renewable energy has yet to reach mass adoption level and a lot of countries are still dependent on the traditional coal and fossil fuel, it’s slow but we are getting there

The government does not do good enough in Solar energy for domestic and Commercial.

Lower the installation cost of Solar to encourage every one to have it. Reduce on TNB energy. So that the quota can give to essential industry.

Think about it. Malaysia' peak period electricity generation is 16GWh of which ~half is from coal. Every GW of nuclear power reduces coal use by 12.5%. The largest nuke power plant in Japan generates 8 GW, China's largest generates 6 GW.

1 site in Bolehland can replace coal use (or at least put it into reserve capacity).

Why cannot remove coal dependency? Its not because of technical constraint.

West have a lot of opinions. Some valid some biased. But at the end of the day when you get hit with cancer West not gonna pay for your treatment.
I am not saying palm oil/coal is good but between that and nuclear I rather choose the former.
I myself use solar 100%. The power is damn good but with the limitations of night time/dark skies. But you win some and lose some. In the long term solar is preferred.

Certified and accredited nuclear expert.
You must be forgotten that in /k/ there are alot of /k/tard instantly become nuclear expert when news agency report nuclear reactor disaster.

nuclear plant will not fly with the very unsophisticated population in Malaysia, that prefers to go drink morning coffee.

yes, the main reason is because cannot convince population. No technical constraint. Current & future generaiton of nuclear power generation is safe. Past accidents all involve early generation nuclear tech.

However convincing population of safety is an uphill task and the real reason why it can't take off.

...even in an educated country like sinkieland, cannot convince. Bolehland even more difficult.

putrajaya the best.. if anything happen then average IQ of malaysia population will go up..

uneducated population will think of siting nuke plants in habited locations.

There are so many islands. Why cannot site on island eg Pulau Aur (60km from coast)?

There are no technical constraints except an uneducated population.

malaysia got?

Established more than 50 years ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysian_Nuclear_Agency

because reneweable energy are not efficient. duhhhh
hydro dam so big but energy created not so great.

Kelate terengganu there build ok... no problem

Urban household waste also cannot settle..

After we got nukliar plant, bill tnb will turun?

You mean all those fellows there got gaji buta 50 years.? No wonder we need nuclear. Have to pay gaji buta/pencen buta.

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Put near Sinkipo
Not Great not terrible

A lot comments that assure modern nuclear reactors very safe one. But there is always the first case and we know boleh land famous for many first infamies( mh370, 1mdb).
The real issue is that of governance because from what we see so far if there occurs some kind of fallout from reactor you can bet your last penny that there will be no transparency and accountability instead a lot of sweeping things under the carpet and dishing out goodies to keep victims happy. Look at putra heights. Till today no sound. And Petronas is supposedly world class.

to operate a reactor is 2 different thing duh

we also have space agency
doesnt mean we are as good as NASA

U DUN SAID?

That one is Gen II in which the design is from 1960...In which start commissioned on 1971...

Imagine how long since then and how advanced the tech now...

Current design is Gen 4 and China is the 1st one to commissioned it on 2023:

The world's first Generation IV nuclear power plant starts its commercial operation in China

In term of clean energy, nuclear is really the way forward while other method such as Hydro, Solar and Wind can be supplementary.

If Malaysia really want to go for DC and EV, eventually really need nuclear.

Nuclear is the cleanest most efficient energy source we have lol.

So many ktards still living in 1980s

takut accident, jangan bawak kereta/motor

berlatih dengan cikgu, dapatkan lesen, kemudian mula memandu

if don't start, will never learn.

Why the hell you post online when you have paper and pens ?

Only toilet paper have. Shall I use my poop as ink?

advance? do you know those with nuclear reactor are having headache on how to handle the radioactive waste?
look deeper and google it and find the cost to contain the radioactive waste.
dun be stupid and woke cos of green energy.....nothing is perfect in this world

This post has been edited by sunami: May 15 2025, 02:29 PM

The Soviet state of .......

I dont like the idea, but if you all persisted, please build it near Sink-kapore

Please build 1 in putrajaya...

Sila lupakan soalan susah

support if build next to pm house

damage done by 1982 Mitsubishi Chemical's refinery still not enough?

This post has been edited by DValentine: May 15 2025, 02:58 PM

nope, that state has a surplus of electricity that they're selling to SG

the north state though every week has some sort of earth hour

That was 13 or 14 years ago. I did asked why, but no feedback from that officer at that time. It was during my uni lawatan sambil belajar day trip to their office. Not sure whether it will still be the current plan or not if this nuclear project is a GO now.

dead town wanna kasi dead lagi, for fukkin sekend time

ppl kena cancer, born with defects

even that time gomen also protek jenpunis company kaw kaw until ppl there brought the company to court

gomen that time: protek kaw kaw, talk shit say no issue safe bla bla bla
ppl there that time: protest kaw kaw

This post has been edited by DValentine: May 15 2025, 03:31 PM

We are big in data Centers. We are trying to push for EV mass update

Both require big upgrade for our National Grid

Renewables are a big scam and not enviromentally friendly

Fossil fuels are price volatile, sourced from foreign sources and contribute to climate change

We invest in Gen 4 reactors and horium reactors will make our power supply ecosystem rock solid and price competetive

No Earthquake risk, no typhoon risk.

Go for nuclear. Sooner the better

Perhaps that area is currently the least population. Risk assessment point of view. Least risky compared to the rest of the locations. Again, that was when we asked 1st project ya.. So 2nd 3rd unknown...

No lah.

Ideal locations are by the sea, along the South facing Singapore and West Coat. By the sea for easier ship transport of materials and waste. Preferably adjacent to current coal plants.

So JB, Port Dickson, ,Port Klang, Lumut and Penang

Better hope China has success with their Thorium Small Modular Reactor and Fusion-Fission Hybrid Reactor which produces far lower nuclear waste.

China Aims To Operate World’s First Hybrid Fusion-Fission Nuclear Plant By 2030

TS stupid AF.

The nuclear reactor planned for Malaysia is actually a SMR type (Go read yourself). It can bring huge benefit in terms of power security amidst rising demand. It is also very much carbon neutral, not completely, but yeah.

Build it on offshore islands. Security also safer.

Relocate any inhabitants so even if accident = no risk to inhabitants.

Large scale emergency evacuation zone is 20km. Offshore islands more than 20km from next nearest island.

Why must be on mainland?

do you know 82% of bolehland energy still come from burning coal and gas????

renewable only 18% boi.

kurang otak realli bahaya

this and if you google got plenty more

TS lagi stupiak.