In both of this,i would say the proc running in HT is better in term of performance.SSE3 is using in some encoding work in movie only.
P4 2.8Ghz vs P4 2.8Ghz, Which wins?, 478 vs 775
P4 2.8Ghz vs P4 2.8Ghz, Which wins?, 478 vs 775
|
|
Nov 11 2007, 09:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
In both of this,i would say the proc running in HT is better in term of performance.SSE3 is using in some encoding work in movie only.
|
|
|
Nov 11 2007, 09:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2007, 10:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(fylon @ Nov 11 2007, 10:14 PM) @Ray Oh sorry i don't know it is your fren.Anyway he shouldn't say that. Dont flame my fren.. See his join date.. Just a rookie. @TS Yea. I agreed with Najmods words. If compare on stock speed, clock to clock northwood or the P4 proc ends with C will be better then Prescott which end with E. But in term of overclocking, Prescott core will shine when running on high FSB. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0502sec
0.89
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 03:27 PM |