Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 P4 2.8Ghz vs P4 2.8Ghz, Which wins?, 478 vs 775

views
     
TSChristopher_LKL
post Nov 11 2007, 08:51 PM, updated 19y ago

Kairi Kawaii ^^
******
Senior Member
1,399 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Destiny Island


Hi guys i have a question here ....

lets say i have these 2 CPUs, both running at 2.8Ghz ... may i know Which is better?

http://www.techpowerup.com/cpudb/272/Intel...ium_4_2.8C.html
coz from wat i think ... the 478 has better FSB and running HT but doenst has SSE3 ...

http://www.techpowerup.com/cpudb/440/Intel...tium_4_511.html
the 775 has lower FSB but has SSE3, and bigger cache (L1 and L2) ...

so ... who wins? smile.gif

thanks!
raymond5105
post Nov 11 2007, 09:22 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
In both of this,i would say the proc running in HT is better in term of performance.SSE3 is using in some encoding work in movie only.
Najmods
post Nov 11 2007, 09:26 PM

*mutter mutter mutter mutter*
*******
Senior Member
5,211 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Konohana


Assuming both using the same RAM, same harddisk, chipset and other else, I say the 2.8C wins. Prescott core has deeper pipeline compared to Northwood, so for clock-to-clock Northwood wins
TSChristopher_LKL
post Nov 11 2007, 09:31 PM

Kairi Kawaii ^^
******
Senior Member
1,399 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Destiny Island


^- okie thanks for all the info smile.gif

but deeper pipeline? hmm clock-to-clock? mind telling me wats that in brief?

thanks smile.gif
best_haiyod
post Nov 11 2007, 09:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zoo Negara



to be honest both suxs tongue.gif
raymond5105
post Nov 11 2007, 09:58 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(best_haiyod @ Nov 11 2007, 09:33 PM)
to be honest both suxs tongue.gif
*
Is this a way to give a comment or help to the thread starter?I know you are rich enough to get decent new cores. I'm still left behind will old old P4 but i think they are enough for my usage.Please don't insult people here. doh.gif
fylon
post Nov 11 2007, 10:14 PM

~ The Revival ~
*******
Senior Member
4,431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Soviet Sarawak


@Ray

Dont flame my fren.. See his join date.. Just a rookie. shakehead.gif But anyways, best_haiyod next time when u wanna reply something, brain before ur hand. Here is a place to discuss yet not to insult.

@TS

Yea. I agreed with Najmods words. If compare on stock speed, clock to clock northwood or the P4 proc ends with C will be better then Prescott which end with E. But in term of overclocking, Prescott core will shine when running on high FSB.
Najmods
post Nov 11 2007, 10:18 PM

*mutter mutter mutter mutter*
*******
Senior Member
5,211 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Konohana


QUOTE(Christopher_LKL @ Nov 11 2007, 09:31 PM)
^- okie thanks for all the info smile.gif

but deeper pipeline? hmm clock-to-clock? mind telling me wats that in brief?

thanks smile.gif
*
Its a technical detail really, on how CPU works, deeper pipeline has the benefits, you can ramp the clock speed more but if the something 'broken' within the pipeline, the entire thing needs to be flushed and start anew. So the 20 stage Northwood is faster to recover from this compared to 31 stage Prescott.

If you want to understand Pentium 4 architecture, or more specifically NetBurst microarchitecture read here (I actually read the whole lot two years ago):
http://xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/netburst-1.html
Prescott vs Northwood:
http://xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/prescott.html

If you start to go hmm.gif of the technical detail then just go with the Northwood, its cooler and less power hungry than the Prescott

EDIT: Spelling error, adding Prescott vs. Northwood

This post has been edited by Najmods: Nov 11 2007, 10:27 PM
raymond5105
post Nov 11 2007, 10:21 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(fylon @ Nov 11 2007, 10:14 PM)
@Ray

Dont flame my fren.. See his join date.. Just a rookie. shakehead.gif But anyways, best_haiyod next time when u wanna reply something, brain before ur hand. Here is a place to discuss yet not to insult.

@TS

Yea. I agreed with Najmods words. If compare on stock speed, clock to clock northwood or the P4 proc ends with C will be better then Prescott which end with E. But in term of overclocking, Prescott core will shine when running on high FSB.
*
Oh sorry i don't know it is your fren.Anyway he shouldn't say that. wink.gif
fylon
post Nov 11 2007, 10:41 PM

~ The Revival ~
*******
Senior Member
4,431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Soviet Sarawak


@Ray

Owh.. No noo.. Gosh! Typo error! Haha.. I actually point the "my fren" to u ray. Not the rookie! blush.gif Getting off topic..

@TS

Are u getting ya self an old system? If then, ur welcome to join the S478 club! laugh.gif Learn from old school..

This post has been edited by fylon: Nov 11 2007, 10:41 PM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0148sec    0.49    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 02:06 AM