QUOTE(jojolicia @ Apr 23 2025, 04:06 PM)
Cannot entirely blame the older gen. They (the India origin) were brought in by british plantation owners. What happen after estate ownership changed hands and what failed to cease (their estate housing, their aminities ie place of worship) with their employment with the estates is today's result.
The then estate workers (old gen) has this 'adverse possession' mind in them. So they stayed on thinking.
https://lawcrust.com/adverse-possession-india-law/
Who failed to correct this? That this law is tak laku-pakai in Msia, I leave this for another chapter.
It is not that simple.The then estate workers (old gen) has this 'adverse possession' mind in them. So they stayed on thinking.
https://lawcrust.com/adverse-possession-india-law/
Who failed to correct this? That this law is tak laku-pakai in Msia, I leave this for another chapter.
You have to remember that when an estate changed ownership, the owner don't simple just bulldoze and flatten everything to an empty land.
It is more often that the new owner is also paying for the infrastructure that is on the piece of land and continue to develop and utilize the infrastructure.
And some how the land ownership falls to the government that proceed to break up estate into multiple plot of land and in the process of legitimizing and provisioning land for the existing infrastructure, for some reason conveniently left out the temple that is already there on the piece of land from since the beginning.
That is how many of these hundred year old temple got shatfed in the first place.
Apr 23 2025, 06:03 PM

Quote
0.0140sec
1.61
5 queries
GZIP Disabled