Feb 20 2025, 04:07 PM
QUOTE(petpenyubobo @ Feb 20 2025, 01:47 PM)
This is very silly logic.
If say the public utility pipe and electricity cable that is the property of the utility company is in front of your house. People tap and steal from it, the tenant is held responsible?
Do you even understand what is a demarcation point or demilitarized zone(DMZ) between 2 country borders work?
At one side is TNB's property, the other side of the beyond the meter is the tenant's responsibility.
In this case, the TNB Smart Meter Input and Output serves as the Demarc Point.
If you don't understand go and Google "What Is A Demarc Point".
This one is gas line into residential homes.
*Only the green line after the demarc point is the responsibility of the property owner.
This case sounds odd. I feel that the law firm which is representing these landlord tenants cases is incompetent and useless when it comes to consumer tribunals. I suggest they should boot him and find a more experienced one in handling their cases since their cases already involved millions.
Nothing to lose to spend a bit more on someone who can handle their cases better.
This is the best explanation and the correct understanding of this topic. If say the public utility pipe and electricity cable that is the property of the utility company is in front of your house. People tap and steal from it, the tenant is held responsible?
Do you even understand what is a demarcation point or demilitarized zone(DMZ) between 2 country borders work?
At one side is TNB's property, the other side of the beyond the meter is the tenant's responsibility.
In this case, the TNB Smart Meter Input and Output serves as the Demarc Point.
If you don't understand go and Google "What Is A Demarc Point".
This one is gas line into residential homes.
*Only the green line after the demarc point is the responsibility of the property owner.
This case sounds odd. I feel that the law firm which is representing these landlord tenants cases is incompetent and useless when it comes to consumer tribunals. I suggest they should boot him and find a more experienced one in handling their cases since their cases already involved millions.
Nothing to lose to spend a bit more on someone who can handle their cases better.
TNB is passing on their responsibility to landlords.
If TNB cannot monitor an area for spikes in electricity consumption and take the appropriate actions before the stolen electricity balloons to RM 1.7 million, what are they even doing? The people should not be footing the bill for TNB's incompetency.
If tomorrow, a pipe bursts outside a house, should the landlord of the house pay for the water wasted because of the proximity to the burst pipe?
Quote
0.0185sec
0.85
6 queries
GZIP Disabled