QUOTE(Raddus @ Jan 23 2025, 07:34 PM)
DNB erricssonU mobile without any pressure would probably opt for Huawei if they havent done so
China Telcos Are Removing US Network Equipments, Cisco Remotely Disabled RU Equipments
|
|
Jan 23 2025, 09:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,035 posts Joined: Feb 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 24 2025, 11:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,035 posts Joined: Feb 2007 |
QUOTE(AfraidIGotBan @ Jan 24 2025, 11:32 AM) All I can see from you is kek / topkek / laughable, ignorance / lol and full of !!!!!! response. Whats this?Quality to the drain. Either salah makan ubat, or memang another lahanats. Lucky you didn't keluar. You'll bring shame further to humanity. Even being a troll or sohai got its limit. Pot calling kettle black? Pan 7 calling Pan lan sohai? Jump aeroplane yet keep talking about shaming humanity .Got see the mirror or not Slowpokeking, Gargamel_gibson, and 1 other liked this post
|
|
|
Jan 24 2025, 12:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,035 posts Joined: Feb 2007 |
QUOTE(AfraidIGotBan @ Jan 24 2025, 12:24 PM) another pan7 man suddenly appear kasi thorlong. You really cant make this upIf life kesian then stay kesian. dun come out terrorize humanity please. Rambles like an alcoholic sharing his pitiful problems in /k Calls other ppl to makan ubat Sendiri leading a pitiful broken english aeroplane jumping existence that needs validation in /k Thorlong lor (look at this pan 7 language) you kesian stay kesian, this is k why so serious You for real ka pan 7? Slowpokeking and COOLPINK liked this post
|
|
|
Jan 27 2025, 03:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,035 posts Joined: Feb 2007 |
QUOTE(Gargamel_gibson @ Jan 25 2025, 01:32 PM) Huawei was much more expensive in the bidding for DNB. All open bid conducted by third party Ernst and young. Huawei was few millions more expensive Hmmmm....i find that hard to believe and im not a wumaoheck i have no love lost for Huawei. I worked for European vendor(s) that had to look over our shoulder constantly as Huawei swapped most of us in the late 2000s into the 2010s. They literally threatening my ricebowl kek But huawei wont be more expensive than Europeans much less E/// unless E/// was very desperate and Huawei didnt have a chance to counter bid Or was it an apple to apple comparison. The final shortlist iirc was E///, Nokia, and other transmission/transport and core networking players like Cisco, FibreHome and NEC etc. E/// and Nokia over the years have streamlined their portfolio only to offer mobile networks, they have divested their other technology areas and have to rely on the above vendors for an end to end solution. Huawei does not need to leverage on the above except possibly Cisco for some key areas in their core (they might actually not also seeing how they grow). They have solutions end to end and can use most if not all inhouse Huawei equipment. If huawei was benchmarked against E/// and Nokia based solely on price and not the mobile portion its not a fair comparison. They are supplying more than the other 2 Again i have to reitirate , i'm not a wumao or a huawei apologist kek. Just that Huawei from experience dont come more expensive most days. Even at their (European vendors that is) most desperate, Huawei can dangle the free swaps to new 2G and 3G equipment to local operators to trump European vendors. They can easily redeploy them at less developed countries in separate commercial deals. Europeans never were as versatile as them in negotiations This post has been edited by 9m2w: Jan 27 2025, 03:27 PM Meis liked this post
|
| Change to: | 0.0138sec
0.73
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 04:28 AM |