Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 China Telcos Are Removing US Network Equipments, Cisco Remotely Disabled RU Equipments

views
     
9m2w
post Jan 23 2025, 09:56 PM

Victoria Concordia Crescit
******
Senior Member
1,035 posts

Joined: Feb 2007



QUOTE(Raddus @ Jan 23 2025, 07:34 PM)
Malaysia use both huawei and Ericsson
*
DNB erricsson

U mobile without any pressure would probably opt for Huawei if they havent done so
9m2w
post Jan 24 2025, 11:41 AM

Victoria Concordia Crescit
******
Senior Member
1,035 posts

Joined: Feb 2007



QUOTE(AfraidIGotBan @ Jan 24 2025, 11:32 AM)
All I can see from you is kek / topkek / laughable, ignorance / lol and full of !!!!!! response.

Quality to the drain. Either salah makan ubat, or memang another lahanats.

Lucky you didn't keluar. You'll bring shame further to humanity.

Even being a troll or sohai got its limit.

*
Whats this?

Pot calling kettle black?

Pan 7 calling Pan lan sohai?

Jump aeroplane yet keep talking about shaming humanity .Got see the mirror or not
9m2w
post Jan 24 2025, 12:47 PM

Victoria Concordia Crescit
******
Senior Member
1,035 posts

Joined: Feb 2007



QUOTE(AfraidIGotBan @ Jan 24 2025, 12:24 PM)
another pan7 man suddenly appear kasi thorlong.

If life kesian then stay kesian. dun come out terrorize humanity please.
*
You really cant make this up

Rambles like an alcoholic sharing his pitiful problems in /k

Calls other ppl to makan ubat

Sendiri leading a pitiful broken english aeroplane jumping existence that needs validation in /k

Thorlong lor (look at this pan 7 language) you kesian stay kesian, this is k why so serious

You for real ka pan 7?
9m2w
post Jan 27 2025, 03:26 PM

Victoria Concordia Crescit
******
Senior Member
1,035 posts

Joined: Feb 2007



QUOTE(Gargamel_gibson @ Jan 25 2025, 01:32 PM)
Huawei was much more expensive in the bidding for DNB. All open bid conducted by third party Ernst and young. Huawei was few millions more expensive
*
Hmmmm....i find that hard to believe and im not a wumao

heck i have no love lost for Huawei. I worked for European vendor(s) that had to look over our shoulder constantly as Huawei swapped most of us in the late 2000s into the 2010s. They literally threatening my ricebowl kek

But huawei wont be more expensive than Europeans much less E/// unless E/// was very desperate and Huawei didnt have a chance to counter bid

Or was it an apple to apple comparison. The final shortlist iirc was E///, Nokia, and other transmission/transport and core networking players like Cisco, FibreHome and NEC etc. E/// and Nokia over the years have streamlined their portfolio only to offer mobile networks, they have divested their other technology areas and have to rely on the above vendors for an end to end solution.

Huawei does not need to leverage on the above except possibly Cisco for some key areas in their core (they might actually not also seeing how they grow). They have solutions end to end and can use most if not all inhouse Huawei equipment. If huawei was benchmarked against E/// and Nokia based solely on price and not the mobile portion its not a fair comparison. They are supplying more than the other 2

Again i have to reitirate , i'm not a wumao or a huawei apologist kek. Just that Huawei from experience dont come more expensive most days. Even at their (European vendors that is) most desperate, Huawei can dangle the free swaps to new 2G and 3G equipment to local operators to trump European vendors. They can easily redeploy them at less developed countries in separate commercial deals. Europeans never were as versatile as them in negotiations

This post has been edited by 9m2w: Jan 27 2025, 03:27 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0138sec    0.73    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 04:28 AM