QUOTE(danielmckey @ Dec 25 2024, 09:06 AM)
As usual foreigner is normally not fully protected under the law. They didn't read the term and conditions before buying.
Only foreigners buyers are involved?100 Singaporeans in legal dispute over condo purch
|
|
Dec 25 2024, 10:28 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
193 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 25 2024, 10:36 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
193 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
|
|
|
Dec 25 2024, 01:30 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
193 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
|
|
|
Dec 25 2024, 06:32 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
193 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(Aftermaths @ Dec 25 2024, 12:56 PM) 900k for a leasehold, somemore need to be choke on the neck......................... Leasehold you don’t own the land but you own the building. This case you don’t own the building.The problem is the Singaporean didn't see properly whether it is lease or freehold before buying? |
|
|
Dec 25 2024, 06:38 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
193 posts Joined: Mar 2005 |
QUOTE(Chowda @ Dec 25 2024, 03:01 PM) Oh it fits leasehold technical description, just that it is not leasehold to gomen, but to developer. Leasehold to government the land owned by government but building owned by owner. This case the building not owned by owner. It is different.This developer playing with fire, being the first case means it will likely be brought to court and fight there, become a landmark case. Let's hope the decision will be to buyer benefit. |
| Change to: | 0.0127sec
0.68
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 05:47 PM |