Civic FE RS to Mazda 3 Liftback Ignite
|
|
 Aug 28 2024, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
6,248 posts Joined: Jun 2006  
|
QUOTE(voscar @ Aug 28 2024, 09:29 AM) Bro, you're saying Mazda's torsion beam handling better than Civic's multilink? Cannot be, someone here said the torsion beam bad handling contributed high number of total lost.... there is more to handling than just rear torsion beam... gotta drive it to feel it... not just looked at specs... also it can suck in one car and excel in another... gotta look at the whole package...BTW, congrats and enjoy the new car.  |
|
|
Aug 28 2024, 02:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
6,248 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Aug 28 2024, 02:27 PM) me older already, so choose car with better NVH. cant stand car with NVH poor as P2, (no offense P2 cars) rented new alza for 10 days... drove up/down mountain and everywhere else... very good nvh imho...soundproofing easy to add as long as chasis/handling is worth the trouble... |
|
|
Aug 28 2024, 05:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
6,248 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Aug 28 2024, 03:43 PM) i did and i prefer the Civic's suspension much more. multilink helps here too not because of rear multilink, more to how the Mazda 3 seems to be on standard outdated absorbers, which the Civic already have bypass valve built into it. it handles high speed compression/rebounds WAY better than the Mazda 3.  imho civic is a more complete car... if not for steering rack problem, quite sure ts wont be changing constant_weight and Quazacolt liked this post
|
| Change to: |  0.0254sec
 0.97
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 02:06 PM |
Quote