bukan dari jenis WWF protected species....obviously.
This post has been edited by Heroicage: Aug 6 2024, 04:08 PM
Cameron Santorini - demolished due to no lesen
|
|
 Aug 6 2024, 04:07 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#61
|
 
Junior Member
265 posts Joined: Jan 2013 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:12 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#62
|
Junior Member
661 posts Joined: Jul 2011
|
Lel
Kekwa |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:13 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#63
|
|
Junior Member
830 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
a lot current in development around that area
the council is sending a message to those ppl |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:14 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#64
|
Senior Member
2,096 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Shithole Klang
|
To be fair it's really tacky and cringe to build replica stuff like that like Cameron is out of nice things to see? tahfeikei liked this post
|
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:16 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,288 posts Joined: Sep 2012
|
QUOTE(Heroicage @ Aug 6 2024, 04:07 PM) bukan dari jenis WWF protected species....obviously. its from sohai retard law breaking motherfucker species...i gotchu bro   |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:20 PM
|
Junior Member
79 posts Joined: Jun 2010
|
demolish 0 benefits
give fine and operating license at least both got income |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:24 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#67
|
Senior Member
1,132 posts Joined: Jun 2015
|
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Aug 6 2024, 12:46 PM) Why demolish instead of apply, review, renovate & pay fine? Kalau legal, then this is not Malaysia    |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:31 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#68
|
Newbie
17 posts Joined: Jan 2014
|
They wont demolish the whole thing as it is quite big property. They will probably demolish till not accessible by public then let owner do the rest.
|
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,861 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: In The HELL FIRE  
|
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Aug 6 2024, 12:46 PM) Why demolish instead of apply, review, renovate & pay fine? If can do this everyone will do it illegal way first after that pay fine to legalize it, not a good practice |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#70
|
|
Junior Member
190 posts Joined: Feb 2021
|
QUOTE(Heroicage @ Aug 6 2024, 04:07 PM) bukan dari jenis WWF protected species....obviously. Kek maruah tchala reading this |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:42 PM
|
Senior Member
1,129 posts Joined: Feb 2021
|
should jail the owner
|
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:42 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#72
|
 
Elite
2,036 posts Joined: Feb 2007 From: KL
|
"It's illegal? Never mind, just do it and pay the fine later. Since it's already built I'm sure they'll allow me to continue."
Some people really think like this. |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:42 PM
|
Junior Member
269 posts Joined: Feb 2011
|
QUOTE(submergedx @ Aug 6 2024, 04:24 PM) Too bad enforcement longkang... even the more well to do ones also do the same thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:50 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#74
|
Junior Member
571 posts Joined: Jul 2007
|
QUOTE(St0rmFury @ Aug 6 2024, 02:55 PM) Cannot bro, this will give the impression can do first, ask for permission later... If do already then not approve only demolish or modify. |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:52 PM
|
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Oct 2010
|
All these illegal structures managed to get away with a fine is because they are private , menaning if it collapse , the owner die not paying guest die.
|
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 04:55 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#76
|
|
Junior Member
81 posts Joined: Mar 2022
|
wow
luckily i went already |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 05:34 PM
|
Senior Member
6,155 posts Joined: Jul 2012 From: Today, 00:01 AM
|
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Aug 6 2024, 12:46 PM) Why demolish instead of apply, review, renovate & pay fine? if not how later no kirjademolish first... at least can show bos ada buat kirja |
|
|
Aug 6 2024, 05:47 PM
|
|
Junior Member
786 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
QUOTE(blanket84 @ Aug 6 2024, 03:13 PM) Yeah. Reading from the few intellectual replies here, there is just too many issues here to point of no return, not just fire hazard, other hazards such as structural integrity, slope integrity, etc2. Heck even simple issue such as land categories might be wrong already (possibly agricultural land). Even if it wasn't built on slope, it might give others idea to emulate the illegal ways of doing it especially if the consequences will just be a slap on the wrist.Retrospective application simply not an option here. Who knows where another illegal structure will be built and what might happen. |
| Change to: |  0.0153sec
 0.12
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 04:31 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.