Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Wanita lintas jalan punca nahas maut direman dua h

views
     
killdavid
post Apr 28 2024, 02:36 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,640 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(commonsense @ Apr 28 2024, 02:30 PM)
No insult. U r the one insulting other people intelligent with your overly protective argument. Plotek something that is unplotectable. Question this and that to justify your arguement
*
Overly protective ? How protective ? Can you define where i was overly protective?

I presented my case with very specific reference to details of the case. If people don't agree , then talk about the case details.

But noooo.....all the reply was protek, butthurt, racist, idiot. That is the only retort people can muster.

Think carefully and read the thread. I just put in my opinion and thoughts. There are also many counter opinion, did i go debate every counter opinion and try to shut them up? Observe ! Majority people able to discuss with me maturely without insults. Only a couple cannot taha my opinion and proceed to make personal attacks. Then counter it with facts la.

Yes i did say may ktards fail critical thinking. Not directed at anyone personally. But siapa makan cili, .....

This post has been edited by killdavid: Apr 28 2024, 02:45 PM
killdavid
post Apr 28 2024, 11:02 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,640 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(commonsense @ Apr 28 2024, 10:54 PM)
your so called intellectual arguement below is flaw. topkek. law also don't know, still dare to say other no critical thinking.

"So the woman cannot be blamed for the accident on the bike."
*
Oh take one sentence and frame it as you like ?
Take the entirety of my points. I said clearly she is an indirect cause, not a direct cause. Never even read the whole context of the stamement and try to twist. I also see many others already catch on to the point but you are still living in your own bias.
You need to do better.

This post has been edited by killdavid: Apr 28 2024, 11:03 PM
killdavid
post Apr 28 2024, 11:15 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,640 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(commonsense @ Apr 28 2024, 11:05 PM)
plotek all u like, people like u even later judge have put his judgement, u will still argue with your so called "critical thinking". topkek.
*
😀
I want to state my case, you sakit hati ?
Got so many comments here with more antagonistic language used, but i wonder why nobody bats an eye, but my comment which tries to disect the problem to its most basic factors, all sakit hati and attack.


killdavid
post Apr 29 2024, 11:45 AM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,640 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(MishimaZ @ Apr 29 2024, 11:24 AM)
Kinda agree and disagree though. While I agree the biker has skills problem the woman is still the cause. 2 lane expressway and speed is something to expect especially - wtf is the woman doing crossing the road and interrupt the flow for.

Would argue that say the woman existence was totally out of place, the 4wd would had been far ahead, and the biker would likely not collided into the the 4wd as shown in the video.

Both the woman and the biker are wrong, but one end up dead and another getting defended and will celebrated when she goes free - which will set similar precedence of road offenses in the future.

Might as well say the lajakers that end up dead aren't in the wrong at the first place.
Dafuq?
*
Not sure why people keep on saying she is being defended. General consensus here is that she is wrong.
Again, in simple terms, how wrong is she ? On a more technical term, wrong on what account ?
Traffic violation or involuntary manslaughter ? That would be a more productive and interest discussion.
killdavid
post Apr 29 2024, 11:53 AM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,640 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(jojolicia @ Apr 29 2024, 10:53 AM)
I have rewatch the vid including the slow mo.

I can see the bike rear flip to the front, it hit landed the road and flip bounced again to impact the rear of pickup before it roll over into the rear carriage of pickup.

What i am unable to see clearly was the rider. Did the rider follow thru the sequence? Or was he on impact 1) with the bike impacted onto him from the 1st flip on the road or 2) impacted together with the bike onto the rear of pickup thereafter or 3) rider's direct impact on the rear of pickup first before his machine impacted onto him at the rear or 4) the rider did not bodily impact the rear of pickup but only his machine or 5) the rider has disengaged from the machine prior to first flip?

Anyone with good eye managed to see the vid clearly?
*
His body was thrown and made direct impact with the Triton's body
killdavid
post Apr 29 2024, 04:55 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,640 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(The_Special_One @ Apr 29 2024, 04:23 PM)
Gila racist bringing race into the picture. Anyone who watched the video of this incident can clearly see that the woman was no longer on the road, the Triton had given signal and slowed, dashcam car also slowed down, yet the motor didn't slow down at all and lost control. Unfortunately he paid with his life.
*
Fact does not matter. Feelings rule the world
killdavid
post Apr 29 2024, 07:21 PM

Senior Satire Officer
******
Senior Member
1,640 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Vault 13



QUOTE(edifgrto @ Apr 29 2024, 06:12 PM)
one thing I like Lowyat here... is that.. here the member are discuss with sense and clever. They know how to judge what is wrong and right. I was page about....11 starting. I read many very good reasoning reply. So, as a old uncle here...i am happy. because you guys can judge accurately who and what is wrong and right. Good to bolehland...

so... make it simple is.... motorbike rider is at fault indeed. you drive the motor, you control the speed. If you unable to control your speed, it is better do not drive on the road. This is very simple logic. of course, one life is lost. rip.

about that woman? fuck her.... she is just being stupid on the road. She is lucky that not becoming a victim on the road only.

about the pickup driver. Yes... another idiot on the road. Althought he got give signal slowing down. but heck!!! you know where you are? you slow does not mean others can see you. If they can see you does not meant they can stop or slow fast enough.

so.... conclusion is... be careful when you are on the road. not only you are on the road. They are many idiots are on the road too. To avoid is better then regret later.
*
Why so happy? You can also see a big majority who are closed towards a different point of view and attack you for trying to reason. Nothing will happen if the girl is not there. That is the same point being repeated followed by insults.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0162sec    0.62    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 04:39 PM