Puas will soon demand the same in our school.

why? i tot only puas mudah keliru with cross?

That's why i say you people aren't any different than jews

macam brothers, both kuat sakit buntut, both like to hide behind religion, both like violence

i tought the one who open threat is the butthurt one?

Yup...i heard someone mentioned "m" race is the lost tribe of juice

Source: trust me bro

well said. once upon a time babi still were not domesticated yet in many places, so babi eat all bangkai they see on the ground including those bangkai of dead human, so jews forbid eating them. then when the christian jesus came and saw ppl oredi domesticated babi and give them proper food, then jesus said can eat no problem. then more than one thousand yrs later on a very hot dessert where babi will never stand a chance to live suddenly got law kenot eat babi. until now i still wonder why u need a law to forbid u eating babi if u will never find any babi in ur place?

This post has been edited by kcal: Mar 14 2024, 11:23 AM

Apa mcm brothers bro. Memang brothers.

Both from abraham line.

Memang bros killing bros, cousin to cousin from the start. Jews and arab blood mix in all of em 99 percent

true. both are semites. their ancestor is sem, one of noah's son according to wat they believe la

TS, stop give them an idea!

Malaysia bila lagi?

Belum spot printing error.

If Ada sure can fitnah like that also.

Fitnah for pahala is the new trend nowadays

Ok eds2

Lol

Bodo

one is afraid of cross.

another one is avoiding 4 like a plague.

all also same la.

But without Arabs....Jews already exterminated long ago by christians.

Arabs vs Jews is a new thing.....

PAS alike ni
Last time when play new chess set, sure got some extremist that go break the cross on top of king piece....

Brain washing is real. Same goes to extremism

The argument seem illogical
Jews diaspora is all around the world.....
And the empire that sun does not set do not belong to Arab

At least people is first world country

Without Arabs taking palestine in 7th century from Byzantine christians....jews will be eradicated long time ago

So why Jews in Europe, America and Russia by WW2?
Arabs took Jews land in Palestine and chase them away?

dude, better decide on ur story plot ya

There are pro Zionist churches in Malaysia still brainwashing their congregation to Pray for Israel, Bless Israel on Sundays.

Little they know that the Jews only see them as animals without purpose on earth and are idol worshipers. Killing goys is the Godly thing to do and they're not going to change their stance on it.

But it's true....jews are relieved that they have been liberated from Byzantine oppression....they even fought together with muslims to defend Jerusalem against crusaders.

The majority of European jews before WW2 was Ashkenazi, which may originated from a small community of jews in Germany... because significant portion their genetic is European

helping my moderate Muslim members to put up some words

its mostly due to the Kharijites/Khawarij concepts slowly and covertly brought in influenced the behaviour of the believers

yes there were so liberated that they were murdered en masse in granada in 1066

wtf

Lmao why scared of cross

True, so why got stupid /k still support them…kek

They think Jew people progressive

baseless assumption. judea (in today's jerusalem) had been under the rule of the roman empire since 6CE. before umar al-khattab came to jerusalem in search of al-aqsa mosque, the city was under the roman empire for over 600 yrs.

i'm not sure how u drew the conclusion that jews would have been eradicated since they were under the roman empire for 6 centuries?

jews are progressive. how many nobel prizes they have won?

Dude, I am not disputing ur story that Jews fight against Crusader with Byzantine.

I am questioning ur exaggeration of Jews being eliminated if not helped by Arabs. It is just a localized event dude

Jews have been dispersed across the world. Even hitler systematic massacre or Jews in Europe would not eliminate them.

Not really

I have seen many Chineses don't bothered about 4 already

House number got 4

Their alphard also got 4

Exceptions always happen...1066 is still during the height of Jewish Golden Age in Al Andalus that lasted until 12th century.

Taifa of Granada was a small independent state in Al Andalus region, as a result when the Caliphate of Cordoba broke up into smallstates or taifas, then later all reunited by Al Moravids

Taifa of Granada had a line of Jewish vizier and the muslim population was agitated by vizier Joseph that had none of the quality of the previous jews vizier Samuel, who was known of being wise. The rampaging mob killed hundreds or thousands of jews.

This was social unrest and isolated only to the taifa of Granada, not other taifas. Also, the massacre wasn't sanctioned by the king of Granada.

This absolutely different during first crusade, when European nobilities allowed genocide of muslims and jews in Jerusalem.

Also according to hadith, killing a dhimmi is forbidden, while wholesale killings were sanctioned by God in bible.

So, those who massacred jews in Granada has violated Islamic Law and can't be defended.

let's make it simple. u claimed that jews were liberated. did jews get any plot of land to govern their own communities?

Of course not.....

But during such a chaotic age, it is surely better for them to be protected as dhimmi. If they become an independent state, Byzantine might end up invading them again.

It is disputed whether Ashkenazi is true jews, because significant European admixture in their gene, so they might be originated from a small group of jews who migrated to Europe and their jews genetics have been significantly diluted.

Ashkenazi is different to pure blooded jews who remained in Palestine.

So, the conflict today, is essentially Arabs vs Europeans with little jews genetics....because Israel today is dominated by Ashkenazis who migrated from Europe.

who are u trying to kid? there were instances of muslims+byzantine alliance against the sasanids. there were also muslim+sasanids against the byzantines. u mean jews could not be offered any alliance in case they were attacked by the byzantines? so jews need to be subjugated according to the pact of umar under the pretext of protecting them. i can go more into detail and point out many ugly things about dhimmis

There r plenty of conspiracy theory to demonize others
Other side also claim current Palestinian is not original habitant
But these r quite meaningless

Fyi jew hate christian. I watch many documentary

Oh didnt know Nobel prize was a measure of progressiveness, but I do know a lot of Nobel laureate hold deeply racist views. Did you know that?

so winning a noble prize doesnt equate to being progressive? now i know where u stand

When Jesus carried the cross, it also looked like “x”




This post has been edited by amboi_asamboi: Mar 15 2024, 12:27 AM

Already the same, many years ago.
Red cross renamed to red cresent.

It seems like you dont understand the word progressive or how they award the Nobel prize, thats why you make idiotic statements like this…

Pulek...kat america, kristian2 ni lah bagi sumbangan kt israel...sampai kt sana di ludahnya balik...

i think u need to use ur brain consistently so that it will function more effectively. how do u think a nobel prize is awarded to scientists whose research benefits people immensely? is that not progressivity? keep on doing ur mental gymnastics dude bcoz ur not so bright after all

When there were such formal alliances?

In such brutal age, it is actually safer for jews to become dhimmi. A real subjugation if they are attacked again and ordered to be massacred by christian nobility.

Of course, there are cases of maltreatments of dhimmi, but it is a direct violation of Islamic law.

People always cite Grenada Massacre of 1066....but never mention about Rhineland Massacres (1096) and Massacre of York (1190)

So bila lagi cannot use t word

It's common sense really....the dominant Ashkenazi jews are mostly European by genetics....They also not culturally jews, bringing atheism and European lifestyle to land of Israel.

They despise the strict lifestyle as prescribed by Torah and Talmud. Ashkenazi police even beat up rabbis they see as too radical, it's crazy.

Then we can finaly say their perangai macam yahudi!

Kenapa nak takut

They rather have a dick for the addition symbol than a cross.

Well Greta Thurnberg was nominated for Nobel Peace Prize and everyone knows she's a Rothschild's climate change activist puppet.

When you control the creation of money and all the central banks, awarding a Nobel prize is like:



Even the Jews themselves(played by Sacha Baron Cohen) made a parody of the idea.

Macam Chinese word 凸

When you control the world's money creation and central banks, you dictate the law.

Real inventors and scientist who came out brilliant ideas can easily be assassinated, buried(made to look like accident) and replaced by your own people and then have the patents stolen. The money game.

You are the authority, the standards administrators , the librarian keeper, and approving boss.

This world is not as clean as you think. Only through years of betrayal, backstabbing and lies encountering that you become street wise.

Typical of conspiracy theorists.

Easy to brush away everything you don't like as conspiracy theorists.



Does these give you an idea?







This post has been edited by petpenyubobo: Mar 15 2024, 09:37 AM

Again what the rich can rob the poor and seize the works of unknown poor contributors?

Don't just go to those corrupted and bribed fact check sites to come to conclusion. Read who is the owner to the patent:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200279585A1/en

This post has been edited by petpenyubobo: Mar 15 2024, 10:04 AM

You do realize before Islam came, the Jews were basically living with Christians right?

For reasons why the rich progressive, liberal becomes richer, the poor regressive, conservative remains poor.

Those didn't read history, don't know.

Yup, I was right, seems like you dont understand the word progressive.



“Progressive,” in its essence, relates to advocating for social reform and seeking improvements in societal issues. It’s about pushing for change to advance social justice, equality, and the betterment of society as a whole. Winning a Nobel Prize doesn’t automatically enroll one in the ranks of progressive activists. You can be a genius in your professional field and still hold personal beliefs that range anywhere on the political spectrum. Their prize-winning work is a testament to their intellectual and professional contributions, not necessarily a reflection of their stance on social reform or progressivism.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/...-sexist-science

P.S. I’m not doing any mental gymnastics, you’re just an idiot who dont understand what certain words means.

Sorry man i think you arguing semantics here without considering how widely used the word is

You blow up your search results you literally get this. Bolded part was what was ommitted

2. (of a person or idea) favouring social reform.
"a relatively progressive Minister of Education"
favouring change or innovation.
"the most progressive art school in Britain"

yes in certain context it can mean advocating for social reform or generally societal issues

It could also mean championing innovation as and individual or a collective . Masyrakat/negar progresif has been used as a catchphrase over the past few years. I doubt the person who coined it had wokeness in their minds

When we use the term "progressive," especially in a socio-political context, it typically invokes the idea of advocating for societal reform. This isn't just a matter of broad interpretation; it's about recognizing the most common usage and the implications that come with it.

The term "progressive" indeed encompasses a wide range of applications, but its most recognized and impactful use is in reference to movements and efforts aimed at societal reform.

To suggest that winning a Nobel Prize is progressive overlooks what progressivism means. Nobel Prizes recognize outstanding contributions across various fields, including science, literature, and peace, but they don't automatically align with the principles of societal reform that define progressivism.

If the guy wanted to insinuate that jews are more advanced then there are many other ways that he could do it, not my fault he choose the weakest argument he could find.

I agree with your wall of text but most pertinently in my layman non lawyer point of view

- Its mainly off tangent to the original arguments you guys having.

Progressive was just recently bastardised into societal reform. It meant a whole lot more in the not too distant pass.

Heck if i specifically googled progressive and innovation to prove my point sure you could say i was continuing a narrative.

But its literally what you searched...expanded

You know the meme can I copy your homework?

Applies in this situation

Yes...and in the land of Israel, they are in the brink of extinction under Byzantine

Like I said, the guy choose a very weak argument for his case and he worded it poorly. Whether the word progressive is bastardized or not is your opinion, I don’t set the rules I just play by them.

Maybe you should teach the other guy how to make his point clearly and more eloquently instead of making stupid correlations

Meh macam both of you guys dived off the deep end in this argument.

Kcal already has accused me of being a dupe and also reporting him. He may have me on the ignore list possibly

Meh, you kinda did the same with your conspiracy rambling on how the word progressive have been hijacked by woke people…kek

Anyways let kcal defend his own arguments…

Serious? One maybe two off the cuff comments and you deduced a conspiracy

One paragraph would be a thesis?

Back and forth with kcal would be.....?