The story about Hang Jebat also not the same as Sejarah Melayu. In Sejarah Melayu, the one who rebelled against sultan was Hang Kasturi and not Hang Jebat.

Chinese not really want to claim but just sort of making jest about the whole myth of Hang Tuah as his name really sounds a bit Chinese.

This post has been edited by 30624770: Feb 19 2024, 11:31 AM

Hang Jebat , Hang Lekiu all also no more ?
Hang Je-bat 二伯
Hang Le-kiu 二舅

This post has been edited by bereev: Feb 19 2024, 11:34 AM

What year? My time 20 years ago, the myth and history tallies about Hang Jebat being the traitor.

Nevertheless, there were many versions of the myth but all concludes only one thing... that Hang Tuah never betray the king despite being framed and be sentenced to death, and there is a verse that exclaims one should submit to every decision a king as to make.

No computer or USB in the past. Its all based on belief only. But 1 thing for sure 2feidei people developed KL so advanced.

upmphd: itu spegetti itali curicopy dari maggi mee malaysia.

upmphd: itu M1A1 tank curi dari proton saga. tengok nama pun tau. M1A1 = Malaysia Satu copy A1

hang tuah buka KL?
atau King Lancelot yg buka KL?

The whole myth of Hang Tuah was based on 2 books. Hikayat Hang Tuah is solely about him and his adventures. Its most famous story is the Hang Jebat amok in palace story. The same story is also mentioned in Sejarah Melayu but instead of Hang Jebat, it was Hang Kasturi who amok. Sejarah Melayu chronicles the whole story of rise and fall of Kesultanan Melaka. It’s the same myth where they say Parameswara was a descendant of Iskandar Zulkarnain which today some Malay historians say is not Alexander the Great because of his bisexuality. I had to read both books last time in school when I took Kesusasteraan Melayu as a subject.

This post has been edited by 30624770: Feb 19 2024, 11:49 AM

Jon Snow buka KL lah!

Sejarah MY takbley pakai.. spin auta spin jaga maruah

do you see a Stesen LRT Yup Ah Loi?
is there a Stesen LRT Abdullah hukum?

hati tissue cannot take Chinese that develop malaysia. also they try to delete those chinese contributor and replace with unless oranges to make shoick sendiri.

yes, tolong return cheras to the refugis

batu caves developed by who? by ikan bakar sekinchan la

Got Jalan Yap Ah Loy but got Jalan Abdullah Hukum?

the problem is hati tissue erase chinese contribution and label them as kongsi gelap. lol that the joke. no need ask people rawang develop by who, shah alam develop by who or even klang develop by who? no shit given. the things is why fk retard delete the history from sejarah book? hati tissue?

Haji Abdullah Hukum ini adalah dari suku kaum kerinci dan berasal dari sungai abu di negeri Kerinci, Sumatera, Indonesia.

KL developed by indon

#doneclaim

yap ah loy is sepupu chin peng

They only know how to worship their past because they dont have current achievement. Let them do what they want while we continue to strive for better future.

Where are the images taken from?

when british arrived, the area was already populated by malays. kampung baru and kampung attap 2 of oldest still exist. the now known as dang wangi was a malay population area. yap ah loy may be the one declared the area as kl. but he was not the founder.