Unifi Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadband Thread V42, READ 1ST PAGE FOR RELEVANT WIFI INFO!
|
|
 Sep 8 2024, 02:31 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#21
|
 
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 
|
QUOTE(samftrmd @ Sep 8 2024, 02:25 PM) Seems like the DNS block was cancelled. Weird. Paused for now. Let's observe how it goes after session with stakeholders. Moogle Stiltzkin liked this post
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 8 2024, 02:36 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#22
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(eclectice @ Sep 8 2024, 02:03 PM) I am unsure about BGP hijacking, but this test resolves BGP correctly for Unifi for IP range 175.*. QUOTE BGP hijacking is the illegitimate takeover of groups of IP addresses by corrupting Internet routing tables For our case, TM did it "legally" themselves. This is not considered as BGP hijacking. |
|
|
Sep 8 2024, 02:49 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#23
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(countingcrows @ Sep 8 2024, 02:42 PM) 👍 Hope it is still on as MCMC definitely needs some inputs from experts from industry & community, be it from technical or social impact. I wonder if it is still on re latest developments...  They could even encourage ISP to roll out automated "family-safe" provisioning of ISP router that performs the same thing with what they did, but on router level, as per customer request. Those who have third party router are tech-savvy enough to use custom DNS server that performs the same thing, leave them alone!This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Sep 8 2024, 03:00 PM Moogle Stiltzkin, bernard.2402, and 3 others liked this post
|
|
|
Sep 8 2024, 02:58 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#24
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(soonwai @ Sep 8 2024, 02:48 PM) The funny thing about the way that TM did their "DNS(IP) hijacking" is that it didn't affect the laypeeps who were not using 1111, 8888, 9999, AdGuard, OpenDNS or Cleanbrowsing. Being a networking major graduate years back (not really practicing a lot now, currently better trained in IaaS field), I would say what they did was just too low. But no matter how, people with knowledge will still come up with workaround and why are they targeting these people? If one was on, say NextDNS, nothing of note has happened. Digi's and Maxis' port 53 redirection, on the other hand, was much more effective. btw Digi 4G is still redirecting.  This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Sep 8 2024, 03:07 PM |
|
|
Sep 8 2024, 07:57 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#25
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(axxer @ Sep 8 2024, 07:52 PM) Selfsign cert without chain of trust, without domain owner consent is already a thing for years. In fact i can already sign a cert for google.com, instruct my browser to trust the bogus cert, instruct my browser to explicitly use my local authoritative dns only, add a bogus zonefile for google.com on my authoritative dns myself, add dns record pointing google.com to an ip hosted to a server locally, visit google.com on the said browser and no red warning, green lock key and all in address bar. But its just that, only trusted by just my 1 browser. Tm problem is to do all that, selfsign, convince browser to trust the said cert etc, for the whole freakin country.blacklist it. Bonus : For the code who doesn't use the system trusted certificate chain, they are still bound to this issue.That would be crazy if I just want to crawl some data with Java/Python and have to disable the verification where it is not supposed to be. I don't even know whether the url I'm connecting to is a legit one or not. |
|
|
Sep 9 2024, 01:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(Oltromen Ripot @ Sep 9 2024, 01:21 PM) and here i am, signed up VPC for heart bypass. Which provider you use? luckily it's just <$1/mth  |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2024, 02:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(Oltromen Ripot @ Sep 9 2024, 01:45 PM) hmmmm are you TM staff? I can't stop arbitrary IP address even if I'm the admin. unifi, perhaps? 😂 |
|
|
Oct 8 2024, 07:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(aizamev @ Oct 7 2024, 10:56 PM) sorry if late to ask. i work in hotel industry. never subscribe to unifi until last month. i subscribe temporary line 800Mbps for my hotel. the rate is RM1899 for a month before tax. It is WiFi 6. they advertise will supply with wifi 6 router. and i received skyworth GN630V. upon checking, it actually wifi 5 router according to manufacturer. and do some googleling found out unifi also supply Fiber Home FH9478 that really wifi 6 router. felt cheated with unifi. can i claim or report this case?  P/S : Even if it is WiFi 5, I won't bother asking UniFi to swap one. There is nothing good with the free one, and get your own router instead. |
|
|
Nov 8 2024, 07:08 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#29
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(exsinner @ Nov 8 2024, 06:54 PM) I've been skimming through the old posts and just found out that 300mbps is getting cgnat too. Since when? Since they "finally" updated their database to reflect the correct package.I had to email them to get public IP back. |
|
|
Feb 16 2025, 01:28 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#30
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008
|
QUOTE(aspire2oo6 @ Feb 16 2025, 01:23 PM) Can I ask unifi just change their sky worth router can I know if I would replace with Asus which model router that support modem as well Just set it to bridge mode + disable WiFi to turn it into modem. Get any ASUS router to connect to it and do PPPoE.https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...#entry110103904 |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0698sec
 0.62
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 09:02 AM |
Quote